Annapolis will achieve little
This Middle East summit is a distraction that will achieve little
The Annapolis Middle East summit won’t produce anything more than a commitment to hold another meeting. But the real worry is that Condoleezza Rice’s intense focus on the Israel Palestine question could distract her from more pressing matters in Iraq, Pakistan and North Korea.
For Rice, it would have been the fulfilment of her second-term dream of creating a new international order to replace the one that she, against type, had helped to rip up with the invasion of Iraq. A Secretary of State who had brought peace to the Middle East might not have been able to resist the entreaties of the Republican party to run for the presidency against Hillary, and the journey that had started in segregated Alabama could have ended in the Oval Office.
But, instead, Blair is already out of office, desperately seeking redemption as an envoy to the Middle East, and Rice is trying to avoid another war in the region before she too departs the scene. Rather than burnishing their legacies, the two statesmen are struggling to pull together a quorum for a summit where getting the ‘family photo’ taken will be a real achievement.
The lead-up to the gathering in Annapolis, Maryland, has hardly inspired confidence. The Bush administration initially scheduled the event as a three-day meeting sometime in ‘fall’. At the beginning of this week the consensus was that it would be a one-day affair on Friday 23 November. By the time it was finally announced on Tuesday, it had morphed into an event on Tuesday the 27th with a dinner on the Monday night in Washington. This Thanksgiving summit is a very moveable feast.
The guest list remains far from certain too: invites were only officially sent out on Tuesday (the joke doing the rounds is that all the participants might end up staying in a room together — but by accident rather than design). The Israelis and the Palestinians will definitely be there, but questions remains about how senior the Saudi delegation will be, and whether the Syrians will turn up or not.
More articles from: James Forsyth | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
WEB EXCLUSIVE: Georgia and Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato - Debate report
Lloyd EvansLloyd Evans on the latest Spectator / Intelligence Squared debate
Clinton Democrats are to blame for the credit crunch
Dennis SewellOur current financial turmoil is not the fault of greedy bankers, says Dennis Sewell. In fact, the banks were bullied into lowering their lending standards by left-wing idealists intent on equal opportunities at any cost
Sex, lies and apparitions
Simon CaldwellMillions travel to Medjugorje each year but, says Simon Caldwell, the world-famous pilgrimage site may soon be exposed as a fraud
I’m proud to be famous for being rude
Giles CorenSwearing and shouting are underrated, says Giles Coren. Four-letter words can be immensely satisfying and extraordinarily effective
The masters of the universe have turned to drink
Venetia ThompsonThe failure of the $700 billion bail-out has driven her former City-boy chums to despair, says Venetia Thompson. But they must rally soon to keep the market moving
High Life
Taki
Taking sides
Georgia sheds light on the mind of Cameron
James ForsythJames Forsyth says that the Tory leader is more immersed in foreign policy than first seemed probable. Unlike Brown, he has ambitions as an international leader
McCain is in for a terrible shock if he wins
Reihan SalamReihan Salam says that most Republicans have no idea how much the American social landscape has changed. They should learn from Obama’s Google-like appeal
Welcome to the United States of Amnesia
Mary WakefieldGore Vidal tells Mary Wakefield that America has forgotten its constitutional roots, and explains why Bobby Kennedy was ‘the biggest son of a bitch in politics’
C’mon Cherie: even Goering stuck up a bit for Hitler
Rod LiddleRod Liddle says it is no surprise that Gordon Brown has ended up as surly and suspicious as he has: the memoirs of John Prescott, Lord Levy and Cherie Blair are appalling acts of treachery and avarice
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Julian Cox
November 23rd, 2007 2:26pmWith her outrageous demand that Jerusalem, the one and undivided, historical capital of the Jewish homeland be divided, I sincerely hope that Condoleezza Rice is not only distracted but develops a nasty case of Attention Deficit Disorder. Who needs enemies when we have friends like her?
William Garrett
November 23rd, 2007 9:09pmTo Julian Cox (comment) Palestine has not been a Jewish homeland for 2000 years. To assume that the Jews have a right to return and throw out the indigenous inhabitants displays racial arrogance. The Jews were treated like rubbish by Nazi Germany but now they treat the Palestinians in a like manner. For shame.
Julian Cox
November 24th, 2007 12:52pmWilliam Garrett, following your argument, the English must surely give London back to the Welsh. I am talking about dividing Jerusalem into two political polities. I am not talking about the ethnic cleansing of those Arabs (and others) presently living (and voting) there. Jeruslem was never the capital of an Arab state. The comparison of Israel's behaviour toward Arabs with Nazi Germany's toward its Jews is a calumny that makes me question not only your anti-Semitic racism but the Spectator's decision to reproduce your odious views. For shame....
A. Resnick
November 26th, 2007 1:41amThe Arab countries don't want peace with Israel, they want to destroy it. How does one enter into peace talks with a opponent who only desires your annihilation.
Alex Haver
December 2nd, 2007 2:14pmMr. Alan Resnick's comment goes to show that he, most likely, hangs out w/ a wrong crowd, otherwise he would have noticed that at one time both Jordan and Egypt tried to destroy Israel. Today, however, they have solid diplomatic relations.