The Annapolis Middle East summit won’t produce anything more than a commitment to hold another meeting. But the real worry is that Condoleezza Rice’s intense focus on the Israel Palestine question could distract her from more pressing matters in Iraq, Pakistan and North Korea.
Even if Annapolis does kick-start a negotiating process, the chances of success are slim. Levy, looking on the bright side, jokes: ‘It’s the same odds that the Israelis score a last-minute goal against Russia. Unlikely, but it could happen.’ It seems doubtful, though, that the people of the Middle East will get as lucky as Steve McClaren. The Palestinians do not yet have the institutions required for effective statehood, and it is hard to see how Blair can help build them while they themselves are engaged in their own civil war. Hamas is still a rejectionist force and, in these circumstances, Abbas cannot, even if he wanted to, make the compromises necessary for peace on issues such as right of return and the Jewish identity of Israel. With Ehud Barak looking to outflank Olmert on the right, disengagement from Gaza bringing not peace but a Hamas enclave, and the political uncertainty created by various corruption scandals, it is far from certain that the Israeli leadership can deliver an agreement on settlements and Jerusalem.
The Bush administration’s supposed commitment to getting the job done before it leaves office is unrealistic. It will almost certainly be left to the next president to try and broker a peace deal — yet again. Then, the issue becomes whether a new administration is prepared to risk its first year being sucked into the vortex of Middle East peacemaking with no guarantee of success: unlikely, to say the least.
A permanent peace between Israel and Palestine with two democratic states living securely side by side is obviously to be wished for in its own right. It would also remove at least one cause of grievance in the Muslim world. But the idea that it would prompt jihadis from Waziristan to Whitechapel to lay down their arms is fanciful and fails to appreciate the true extent and nature of the Islamist agenda.
Annapolis will, barring disaster, be the start of a process. But the prospects for peace in the foreseeable future are dim. There is a risk, as the former Cabinet secretary Lord Butler said of Blair in Northern Ireland, that the process becomes everything, and you pay too high a price to keep it moving. The biggest danger, though, is that Rice’s negotiating skills and energy will be so consumed by this quest for the ultimate diplomatic achievement, that gains in Iraq are squandered. If that were to happen, it would make this event an even greater tragedy — and one with worse consequences for the Middle East and the wider world — than Arafat’s refusal to say yes in 2001.
More articles from: James Forsyth | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more
Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat
Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little
Rod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case
Fraser Nelson says that the Pre-Budget Report killed off New Labour without landing a punch on the Tories. It has paved the way for a new Conservatism, in which Cameron woos aspirational voters, focuses on government debt and looks for responsible spending cuts
Taking sides
James Forsyth says that the Tory leader is more immersed in foreign policy than first seemed probable. Unlike Brown, he has ambitions as an international leader
Reihan Salam says that most Republicans have no idea how much the American social landscape has changed. They should learn from Obama’s Google-like appeal
Gore Vidal tells Mary Wakefield that America has forgotten its constitutional roots, and explains why Bobby Kennedy was ‘the biggest son of a bitch in politics’
Rod Liddle says it is no surprise that Gordon Brown has ended up as surly and suspicious as he has: the memoirs of John Prescott, Lord Levy and Cherie Blair are appalling acts of treachery and avarice
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Julian Cox
November 23rd, 2007 2:26pmWith her outrageous demand that Jerusalem, the one and undivided, historical capital of the Jewish homeland be divided, I sincerely hope that Condoleezza Rice is not only distracted but develops a nasty case of Attention Deficit Disorder. Who needs enemies when we have friends like her?
William Garrett
November 23rd, 2007 9:09pmTo Julian Cox (comment) Palestine has not been a Jewish homeland for 2000 years. To assume that the Jews have a right to return and throw out the indigenous inhabitants displays racial arrogance. The Jews were treated like rubbish by Nazi Germany but now they treat the Palestinians in a like manner. For shame.
Julian Cox
November 24th, 2007 12:52pmWilliam Garrett, following your argument, the English must surely give London back to the Welsh. I am talking about dividing Jerusalem into two political polities. I am not talking about the ethnic cleansing of those Arabs (and others) presently living (and voting) there. Jeruslem was never the capital of an Arab state. The comparison of Israel's behaviour toward Arabs with Nazi Germany's toward its Jews is a calumny that makes me question not only your anti-Semitic racism but the Spectator's decision to reproduce your odious views. For shame....
A. Resnick
November 26th, 2007 1:41amThe Arab countries don't want peace with Israel, they want to destroy it. How does one enter into peace talks with a opponent who only desires your annihilation.
Alex Haver
December 2nd, 2007 2:14pmMr. Alan Resnick's comment goes to show that he, most likely, hangs out w/ a wrong crowd, otherwise he would have noticed that at one time both Jordan and Egypt tried to destroy Israel. Today, however, they have solid diplomatic relations.