Home > The Magazine > Features

Thursday 4 December 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Ancient and Modern

Peter Jones

Wednesday, 16th July 2008

Lessons from the ancients

Whether Muslims want elements of sharia law to have the force of civil law or not (not, it is argued in last week’s Spectator), the principle of different jurisdictional codes existing side by side has been with us for thousands of years.

The general principle of private settlement of disputes, on any terms agreeable to all parties, is very ancient. Athenians insisted that an attempt was made at a private settlement before almost any case could be allowed to come to court. In Rome, where the praetors acted rather like chief justices, the praetor peregrinus (apparently) controlled proceedings involving foreigners. If that is so, it suggests that alien cultures somehow needed different treatment.

When Romans took over a province, they were perfectly happy to let local custom prevail over wide areas, but the provincial governor could impose Roman law where he so chose. When Cicero was governor of Cilicia (south-eastern Turkey), he tells us that he followed closely the recommendations made earlier for Asia by Q. Mucius Scaevola, ‘including that one which the natives regard as their charter of liberty, that cases between natives should be tried under their own laws’, while keeping the big issues of finance (debt, interest rates, tax) and property (e.g. inheritance) in his own hands. A different tack was taken in Sicily, where in 132 bc the consul Publius Rupilius enacted a decree which defined precisely what the respective judicial competences of Roman and Sicilian judges would be.

The salient point here is that the Roman governor always made the final decision. It was he who accepted or rejected a suit; he who defined (in a ‘formula’) the terms (Roman, local or a mixture of both) on which it would be settled; and he who decided which judge or judges should reach the verdict. None of this compromised Roman law.

In other words, the use of sharia principles is uncontentious as long as (i) all parties are willing, and (ii) English law is not thereby subverted. What is unacceptable is that sharia is imposed on the unwilling. Equally unacceptable is the idea that arguments based on divine authority should be privileged. Romans would have rejected such a notion with contempt. So should we.

Peter Jones’s Vote for Caesar has just been published.

More articles from: Peter Jones | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Murdoch’s big secret is that he doesn’t have one

Michael Wolff

Michael Wolff reveals how he secured Rupert Murdoch’s co-operation for his biography and discovered that this media titan has no interest in posterity. He is, at heart, a city editor

I will always defend a big spender like J.M. Keynes

Nancy Dell�Olio

Nancy Dell’Olio makes an impassioned case for Keynesian economics as the necessary remedy for the global crisis. It is to the Cambridge economist that we should turn once more

How I became Bulgaria’s etiquette guru

Dylan Jones

Dylan Jones is astonished to find in Sofia that the former communist country has embraced his guide to the mores of modern life — and that not everybody looks like Borat

Rudd has lurched from indecision to phoney war

Matthew Castray

Matthew Castray looks back on the Australian Prime Minister’s first year in office and audits an administration which has reviewed much and done very little

Incompetence is fine: but being offensive is sure to get you sacked

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle says that something has gone wrong when 15 South Lanarkshire social workers are sacked over a dodgy Gary Glitter joke while none of their counterparts in Haringey has even been reprimanded over the ‘Baby P’ case

And Another Thing

Paul Johnson

Human beings and pigs have a very peculiar relationship

Our survey shows British Muslims don’t want sharia

Irfan al-Alawi & S. Schwartz

Don’t believe the Lord Chief Justice any more than the Archbishop of Canterbury, say Stephen Schwartz and Irfan Al-Alawi

For real globalisation, look at Ancient Rome

Peter Jones

Peter Jones says the Romans made things work by keeping it simple. Gordon Brown could learn from this world in which complexity was an ill to be avoided not embraced