Tuesday 7 October 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


God's role in politics

God’s role in politics is not to underwrite bad ideas

Wednesday, 12th December 2007

How those in power take the Almighty's name in vain

Sadly, we were not privy to our former Prime Minister’s conversations with the ‘Man Upstairs’; but listening to Mr Blair, and reading the likes of Hind and Gray and Blix, you begin to form the impression that those conversations he enjoyed of an evening, when nobody was listening, were a little — how can we put it? — one-sided. They seem to have consisted of Tony suggesting a particular course of action — ending poverty, stopping global warming, killing Arabs, accepting a donation from Bernie Ecclestone, whatever — and God being afforded the opportunity only to nod in agreement and maybe say, ‘Yes, Tone, you’re dead right, son.’

The longer Blair remained in office, the more pronounced became the shift away from that first and crucial god — public opinion — and towards some other higher being. As that BBC documentary cleverly evinced, towards the end of his tenure Blair rarely expanded upon his reasons for doing some deeply questionable act beyond the look-I’m-an-honest-sorta-bloke shrug of the shoulders and the repeated mantra: ‘Well, I did it cos I thought it was the right thing to do.’ Over and over again Blair cited this as his sole reason for embarking upon one or another catastrophic course of action; he never said, ‘I thought it was the right thing to do, but sadly I was mistaken,’ and still less, ‘Look, I did it cos it was politically expedient and seemed attractive at the time.’

More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

ed fisjer

December 13th, 2007 8:49am

After last weeks drivel it'll be a long time before I take anything that Liddle has to say seriously.

Richard Bale

December 13th, 2007 2:55pm

Spot on Rod as almost always

Jay Collins

December 13th, 2007 3:18pm

Why is there a "sic" in the following sentence, from the article? ‘Worship anyone you like, Blair seems to be saying, as long as you believe in the existence [sic] of the Anglo-American “War on Terror”.’ Is there something wrong with the word "existence" here?

Cogito Ergosum

December 13th, 2007 3:56pm

It reminds me of the time I asked a horse if it had any problems.

"Nay", it replied.

Such is religious certitude.

tom

December 13th, 2007 6:51pm

"...a commitment to plurality of belief systems"? What that?

Herbert Thornton

December 13th, 2007 9:14pm

Very interesting - Ron Liddle now knows what went on in Tony Blair's mind over several years, and sneers at Blair for being insincere.

Then he tells us that Inayat Bunglawala and The Muslim Council of Britain have suddenly modified their relationships with Allah and have become secular. In their case however, his mind-resading ability prevents him from sneering. He wants us to believe that they, unlike Tony Blair, are completely sincere.

Pull the other one, Ron.

Nigel Ford

December 13th, 2007 9:57pm

But rather than down playing his religous convictions, Blair did make great play of his supposed Christian beliefs as Leader of the Opposition back in the mid 90's which helped him successfully win over Middle England. When he reached No 10, the press kept telling us he was the most devout PM since Gladstone so his faith was hardly a secret. Unlike Bush however, I could however never square his stance on social issues like abortion, homosexuality and divorce where his voting record could be mistaken for a libertarian or militant atheist and ran counter to most people's interpretation of biblical teaching. Still unlike many others I knew he was a phoney all along.

Nigel Ford

December 13th, 2007 9:58pm

But rather than down playing his religous convictions, Blair did make great play of his supposed Christian beliefs as Leader of the Opposition back in the mid 90's which helped him successfully win over Middle England. When he reached No 10, the press kept telling us he was the most devout PM since Gladstone so his faith was hardly a secret. Unlike Bush however, I could however never square his stance on social issues like abortion, homosexuality and divorce where his voting record could be mistaken for a libertarian or militant atheist and ran counter to most people's interpretation of biblical teaching. Still unlike many others I knew he was a phoney all along.

Dwight Vandryver

December 14th, 2007 3:54am

Another disjointed and rambling article from our Rod. If UK society were simply a post-Christian one, things would be simpler. Unfortunately, Islam introduces an alien set of values into an indigenous population who, historically, have learnt the hard way that it is better to keep God as a personal belief, while allowing the practicalities of life to be determined by non-religious political discourse. The Blair years were a disgrace. As a Briton, it is difficult to associate oneself with pre-emptive war. Yet, these are the facts: if 9/11 had not happened, Iraq War 2 would not have happened, neither would 7/7. Let us remember that the aftermath of Iraq War 1 left Saddam in power and with good reason. The Irish troubles and the post-Yugoslavian split were indicators that religious factionalism would keep the peacekeepers embroiled for years or decades. The West understood it then, but failed to understand it after 9/11. History was thrown to the wind and the need to satisfy the American electorate became paramount, especially as Bin Laden was not to be found. Mr. Blair saw his opportunity to become what history books might call "a knight in shining armour", basking in the reflected light of The President of the one and only superpower. Yes, remember Hans Blix, WMDs delivered to our shores within 15 minutes, "sex-up" dossiers, Andrew Gilligan, Greg Dyke and the taming of the BBC, post-Hutton. And all to satisfy one man's vainglory. A sorry footnote in history, the consequences of which we are yet to rue.

gerry

December 14th, 2007 9:47am

"...a commitment to plurality of belief systems"? What that? Tom, to me it suggests an implicit assumption that, being mutually self-contradictory, they're all a load of codswallop.

K.Vijayakumar

December 15th, 2007 6:51am

If there is any role for God in politics, it is to keep the Bushes and Blairs of the political world a wide berth and make them stew in their own juice. God, as of now, seems to be doing just that to Tony and George.W.

Peter Gompertz

December 16th, 2007 10:11pm

and as someone once said " only fools are certain, intelligent people always have doubts'

Stephen

December 17th, 2007 2:53pm

I still think Blair is essentially a good man. The election of G. Bush was the end of his run of good fortune. Al Gore would have (I hope) avoided the crazy neo con nonesense and TB would have worked closely with him as he did with Bill Clinton.

rod liddle

December 18th, 2007 1:21pm

The "sic" was there because I assume Hind chose the wrong word; we all believe in the existence of the war against terror. It's the questionable rectitude of it which bothers some of us. Commitment to a plurality of belief systems? Simply an acknowledgement that people should be allowed to believe what they like, I suppose, and that there will always be those who disagree with you. Dwight: I'M disjointed and rambling???!!

Gervas Douglas

December 18th, 2007 3:48pm

It is becoming increasingly apparent that Tony "Miranda" Blair is mad as well as bad. How could the British electorate re-elect such a demented psychopath twice?

Andrew

December 19th, 2007 7:56am

Not the best article I've read from Rod I'm afraid. Less of this sort of mock polemics and more of your usual genuine wit in 2008 please. Happy Christmas

Russ USA

December 19th, 2007 11:07pm

Hmmm...God's role in Politics... Let's try this little thought on for political guidance: "Virtue is God’s Law. It is under the patronage and protection of a rewarding and avenging Deity. —By his unalterable will, virtue and happiness are, in the ultimate result, bound together in an indissoluable chain. Think not, short-sighted presumptuous mortal, to make a computation about the possible advantage of doing wrong in a single instance. Never imagine that you have an inducement to attempt to serve or deliver yourself by a departure from right—or any reason to be discouraged from duty by a doubt of final support and reward. Say you that natural religion leaves these truths open to question? we have the articulate voice of God,[ the Bible] an extraordinary light from heaven to dispel every doubt, to make them clear and certain." Pretty clear "God role" here, it should humble every living human being, let alone those who talk "Faith." Incidentally, the quote is from an 1816 Election Discourse to Massachusetts politcians by John Thornton Kirkland, D.D. (b. 1770- d. 1840). He served as President, Harvard University, Nov. 14, 1810 to April 2, 1828. B.A, Harvard, 1789, M.A., Harvard, 1792, also Dartmouth, 1792, Brown, 1794, S.T.D. Princeton, 1802, L.L.D., Brown, 1810.

Brian in South Korea

December 20th, 2007 2:41am

A very well written article, Mr. Liddle! Your work is always a pleasure to read, but this article is profound as well. What you write about the lack of humility in Blair's Christianity seems to me true about evangelical Christianity in general.

eliXelx

December 23rd, 2007 10:13pm

Ah! Yes! The God of public opinion! Is that the God you're appealing to in this article, Rod? 'Cos if you are yo will soon find that this God, unlike Tony's God, is fickle and inconstant. You make God into a bad word, Rod, and you make a rod for your own back! Did your daddy beat you with that rod, Rod?

Demetrios Hadjinicolaou

December 29th, 2007 12:45am

The Lord God-Man, Jesus Christ has been sinless and faultless and has never admitted to any mistake, for He has never made any; don't blashpeme, Mr Liddle.


In this section

WEB EXCLUSIVE: Georgia and Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato - Debate report

Lloyd Evans

Lloyd Evans on the latest Spectator / Intelligence Squared debate

Clinton Democrats are to blame for the credit crunch

Dennis Sewell

Our current financial turmoil is not the fault of greedy bankers, says Dennis Sewell. In fact, the banks were bullied into lowering their lending standards by left-wing idealists intent on equal opportunities at any cost

Sex, lies and apparitions

Simon Caldwell

Millions travel to Medjugorje each year but, says Simon Caldwell, the world-famous pilgrimage site may soon be exposed as a fraud

I’m proud to be famous for being rude

Giles Coren

Swearing and shouting are underrated, says Giles Coren. Four-letter words can be immensely satisfying and extraordinarily effective

The masters of the universe have turned to drink

Venetia Thompson

The failure of the $700 billion bail-out has driven her former City-boy chums to despair, says Venetia Thompson. But they must rally soon to keep the market moving

Related articles

Georgia sheds light on the mind of Cameron

James Forsyth

James Forsyth says that the Tory leader is more immersed in foreign policy than first seemed probable. Unlike Brown, he has ambitions as an international leader

McCain is in for a terrible shock if he wins

Reihan Salam

Reihan Salam says that most Republicans have no idea how much the American social landscape has changed. They should learn from Obama’s Google-like appeal

C’mon Cherie: even Goering stuck up a bit for Hitler

Rod Liddle

Rod Liddle says it is no surprise that Gordon Brown has ended up as surly and suspicious as he has: the memoirs of John Prescott, Lord Levy and Cherie Blair are appalling acts of treachery and avarice

‘It’s harder for straights to feel Christian charity than gays’

Theo Hobson

Theo Hobson meets Gene Robinson, the only openly gay Anglican bishop, who says that homosexuals are more open to the Christian ‘message of radical change’

Cameron gets ready for No. 10 — and Boris must wait his turn

Fraser Nelson

David Cameron talks to Fraser Nelson about his local election triumphs, admits that he is not going to ‘agree on everything’ with the new Mayor of London, and says Boris should join the queue to become PM after him

Spectator recommends

Sky - Official Site

Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.

Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month

Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other