Benazir Bhutto’s son has none of his mother’s glamour, says Christina Lamb, but he must now do his dynastic duty in a country cruelly deprived of its only pro-Western, liberal leader and in which no one feels it is safe to criticise the establishment
In many ways I owed my career to her. It was an invitation to her wedding 20 years ago that served as my introduction to Pakistan. I was so captivated that I gave up my job as a trainee TV reporter in Birmingham and shortly afterwards returned as a would-be foreign correspondent covering her first rise to power in 1988. Later we fell out because of my criticism of her two periods as prime minister, which were marked by corruption rather than legislation. Both times her tenure was brought to an abrupt halt by the military, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half its 60-year existence. But in recent years we had mended our fences and often met for lunch when she was in London.
Because of that, I was on her bus when it was bombed. Benazir was convinced that the people who had killed her father were behind that attempt — a group she referred to as the ‘old guard’. By this she meant senior bureaucrats and officers from the military intelligence ISI who had been promoted during the rule of General Zia. She started firing off emails to friends, journalists and diplomats describing threats against her. In Dubai in October she had written her last will and message to the party. Yet despite the threats she refused to hide behind the armour-plated shields carefully constructed by her security. Instead she was always popping up from sun roofs as if she thought herself immortal. When asked about the risks she would always reply: ‘It’s in God’s hands.’
Of course they got her in the end, but it was still a shock, even to those who had disliked her. ‘The whole nation is in mourning,’ said an old friend of mine who had always been her critic. Perhaps fittingly for one who had for so long stood against the military’s involvement in politics, when the moment finally came it was in the garrison town of Rawalpindi, headquarters of the army. Benazir had been addressing a rally at Liaquat Bagh, a park named after the country’s first prime minister, Liaquat Ali Khan, who was assassinated in 1951, just four years after Pakistan’s creation. Round the corner used to be Rawalpindi jail where Bhutto’s father was hanged in 1979.
More articles from: Christina Lamb | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
In the wake of Cameron’s decision to drop his pledge to match Labour spending, Fraser Nelson and Daniel Fin kelstein of the Times trade rhetorical blows over the issue that is gripping and troubling the Conservative party as it adjusts to the transformed economic context
Bryan Forbes remembers listening to Churchill as a 14-year-old evacuee and now looks with envy at Obama’s capacity to galvanise hope. Where are his UK counterparts?
The first takeaways originated about 150 million years ago, says Christopher Lloyd; global travel is pretty ancient, too. And as for democracy...
Catherine Blyth says that conversation is an art: its essence is the acrobatic business of reading and changing minds — talking with people, not at them
Martin Vander Weyer looks ahead to next week’s Pre-Budget Report and reflects on George Osborne’s contentious remarks about the devaluation of sterling. It looks like Gordon Brown is getting away with his borrowing binge — leaving the Tories isolated
After a week of clamorous competition between the parties over tax cuts, Fraser Nelson offers a guide to paying for them: a programme of spending cuts that would preserve core services but shave off the fat of the Brown years. All that is needed is political will
Lloyd Evans on the latest Spectator / Intelligence Squared debate
Andrew Tyrie says that root-and-branch reform of the Treasury will be needed when Brown is gone, including weekly minuted meetings. Past friendship is not enough
Fraser Nelson meets the shadow schools secretary and finds him bracingly radical and disarmingly polite: a recipe for success in government
Ross Clark says that far from keeping our streets safer or cleaner, the government’s new force of amateur policemen are ignoring the worst offenders and pursuing law-abiding innocents instead
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Reid
January 4th, 2008 12:06pmChristina Lamb's article is shallow, sloganeering and little more than a propaganda piece. Noone in Pakistan's history or currently has a problem with speaking up - however, those who wish to further UK and British interests in the country, depriving it of its independence and making it a lackey state, should fear a backlash. History is no longer the same where people allowed themselves to be colonized by sell-out self-interested leaders. The 20 or so medieval feudal families like Benazir's who receive Western patronage are slowly being renegated to the dustbin of history - their only support comes from the poor slave like peasants in their regions that have little other choice. Pakistan is in a political flux (like the whole Muslim world) where most people believe the country's potential future is in a fusion of Islam and politics, not in reliving its failed past of attempting to secularise the two. The War on Terror is a war to prevent the Muslim people in trying to determine their destiny - it appears difficult for ex-colonial powers to shake their colonialist tendencies.
Jav
January 4th, 2008 4:01pmMrs Bhutto and her ilk have run up multi-billion dollar fortunes since coming to power - she got the easy way out. She should be tried for her crimes. Pakistan needs new leadership that reflects what its people want (modern progressive Sharia) - not what minority elites what nor what the US or Britain think is good for it.
Sumant Rawat
January 4th, 2008 8:16pmIts too bad that Benazir could not accomplish what is most needed in Pakistan and what she truly represented ..an educated confident Muslim woman respectful of Tradition.
Jay Wilson
January 5th, 2008 6:31pmChristina Lamb is a disgrace to your magazine. Like so many Western Journalists she has been taken in/over by the Bhuttos. Benazir in power did nothing for women, or minorities, or to halt the growth to power of the armed extremist militias, or the Paki and Afghan jihadis supported in Kashmir. Read William Dalrymple on this subject and stop employing this journalistic rodent in lamb's clothing.
Anne Cooper
January 12th, 2008 9:29pmIt is a archaic system which chooses its leaders on the basis of religion, parentage or family connections. Only the democratic process can offer people of real ability, who appeal by definition to the majority. A primitive tribal system can only ever produce primitive tribal consequences.
Sapna Mummunka
March 21st, 2008 1:39amAlthough i had never been much of a Benazir supporter, her assassination did come as a blow. She certainly did promise much more than she actually did. however it is important to dispell your misguided statements. At a remembrance i attended in Lahore this January, it came as a surprise to hear Asma Jahangir (a noted human rights activist, who at many an occassion had criticised BB's several actions during her tenure) admit that two of the first things BB did when coming to power in 1988 was to forbid the public whipping of women as was common in those days and had women who had been wrongfuly imprisoned, realeased. And as for empty criticisms of Christina Lamb, that i find to be based on nothing but utter ignorance, having been familiar with her writing, i can personally attest to the fact that she remained to be unbiased in her reporting in regards to BB despite their close ties, having criticised her for not doing enough for the women of Pakistan and bringing up the corruption charges at several occassions. If anything, i would commend Christina Lamb for achieving an impartial stance, without letting personal ties cloud her judgement. The ability to remain objective is by far the most daunting task for a journalist and she has managed to pull it off so good for her!