The PM is about to unveil his comprehensive National Security Strategy. Con Coughlin says the best idea to import from America is not a National Security Council but a new Homeland Security Department with a minister of Cabinet rank
A better alternative might be to set up our own Homeland Security Department — represented by a minister of Cabinet rank — which would have responsibility for ensuring proper protection of our borders and joined-up liaison between the various bodies responsible for intelligence and security issues.
The aftermath of the 7 July bombings demonstrated that, for all the billions of pounds of extra resources that had been thrown at the various agencies responsible for protecting the country from terrorist attack, a breakdown in communication allowed suspects who were briefly under surveillance to fall off the radar, and reappear to commit Britain’s worst post-war atrocity a couple of years later.
A truism often repeated among the intelligence and security establishment is that people only focus on their failures, not their successes, and it doesn’t matter how many terrorist attacks they manage to prevent, they will always take the flak for the ones that get through.
And this is how it should be. What is the point of spending billions of pounds towards improving the effectiveness of the nation’s counter-intelligence operations if someone who is identified as a potential suspect, as happened in the case of Mohammad Sidique Khan, the ringleader of the 7 July bombings, is somehow able to slip through the net? A Homeland Security Department would mean such errors were not repeated.
It might not seem like it sometimes, not least because the front lines of the military campaign are located in distant, foreign lands, but we are a nation at war, and that cardinal truth must be the foundation of the government’s future national security strategy.
Con Coughlin is the Daily Telegraph’s executive foreign editor.
More articles from: Con Coughlin | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Martin Vander Weyer looks ahead to next week’s Pre-Budget Report and reflects on George Osborne’s contentious remarks about the devaluation of sterling. It looks like Gordon Brown is getting away with his borrowing binge — leaving the Tories isolated
The movie W. did not provide the crude anti-Bush agitprop that the reviewers craved, says Rod Liddle. This was precisely its strength: we need to get inside the minds even of those we most deplore
In the wake of Cameron’s decision to drop his pledge to match Labour spending, Fraser Nelson and Daniel Fin kelstein of the Times trade rhetorical blows over the issue that is gripping and troubling the Conservative party as it adjusts to the transformed economic context
Bryan Forbes remembers listening to Churchill as a 14-year-old evacuee and now looks with envy at Obama’s capacity to galvanise hope. Where are his UK counterparts?
The first takeaways originated about 150 million years ago, says Christopher Lloyd; global travel is pretty ancient, too. And as for democracy...
After a week of clamorous competition between the parties over tax cuts, Fraser Nelson offers a guide to paying for them: a programme of spending cuts that would preserve core services but shave off the fat of the Brown years. All that is needed is political will
Stand by for a mighty clash between two politicians, says Fraser Nelson. The now infamous dinner between Mandelson and Osborne was a cordial parting for power-brokers of different generations who will fight each other savagely for electoral advantage
Andrew Tyrie says that root-and-branch reform of the Treasury will be needed when Brown is gone, including weekly minuted meetings. Past friendship is not enough
Fraser Nelson says that the Tory leader must not be tempted by a ‘safety first’ strategy at his conference in Birmingham. The global financial crisis has transformed the political context and left an opening for the Conservatives to promise true radicalism and to be proudly bold
Amid global financial turmoil, and on the eve of Labour’s conference, Fraser Nelson and Peter Hoskin reveal the true extent of the nation’s debt — equivalent to £26,100 for each British household — and Brown’s scandalous manipulation of the Private Finance Initiative
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Austin Barry
January 24th, 2008 7:59amWe are currently in a "phoney war" phase, because we've been lucky. I suspect, or rather expect, that within the next year or so there will be a number of successful Islamist terrorist attacks in the UK. When that happens all bets will be off, and if Brown and Smith think that pussy-footing around the issue with the semantical designation of the Jihadists as criminals is going to keep the lid on things they must be dafter than they seem.
mark
January 24th, 2008 1:08pmI reckon that the UK as essentially a liberal democracy requires to be pushed a little bit more before it finally wakes up to the threats and takes the necessary steps to address them. Democracies are resilient and whilst loath to strike the first blow, when pushed to the wall will eventually win in the long term. Which begs a question - is Islamist terrorism an existential threat against the fabric of the nation - or will it "only" be a long running, and occasionally tragic, annoyance. Do we really think it possible for the green flag to fly over parliament? I think not.
EyeSee
January 24th, 2008 1:13pmBrown's response to the failed bombings was to do nothing, something he is supremely good at. The intellectual elite don't think the teror is Islamist in origin. Brown (or you) may claim that his reviews are far reaching and with good cause, but they all seem to end up with the innocent general public being harrassed and constrained and no reduction in risk or threat. 4000 terror suspects. Really? Or maybe, or maybe not. We don't know and my money is on, nor do they. Brown and his caste are useless and have infected all around them with inertia and incompetence. Look at the contempt heaped on our soldiers.
Iftikhar Ahmad
January 25th, 2008 11:59amSalaam Muslim community was and still victim of Paki-bashing for the last 50 years in every walk of life. Now the Muslim youths born and educated are victim of terrorism. Thousands of them are being searched in streets and hundreds are behind the bar without any trial. Britain is becoming a more racist society. Media and the Government policies play a major part in encouraging racism, prejudices and fears. After 9/11, 7/7 and Glasgow Bombing the climate of hatred and erosion of human rights are common part of every day occurance. Communities are more devided than ever. Anti-terrorist legislation is creating further resentment, alienation and criminalisation.
Colin-Stuttgart
January 25th, 2008 1:31pmWhy should a Homeland Security Dept. be able to do any more that the security agencies that already exist? Some else that the Government should consider very quickly and that is the repatriation of any immigrant refugee or other wise who commits a crime in addition to those who are trying to slip into the country. They should not be kept in holding cells or wherever but deported immediately!
Ian
January 25th, 2008 3:38pmIftikhar Ahmad, 'Hundreds behind bars without any trial'!? Prove it. Evidence please? There are enough PC liberal lawyers, some of the Muslim, to invoke Habeas Corpus (before the EU makes illegal) if that were true.
Chris
January 25th, 2008 5:05pmTo be quite blunt, you can take all this "war on terror" drivel and stick it where the sun doesn't shine. We got through the attacks of the IRA without all this. The attacks being made by the security junkies on our way of life are much more serious than anything threatened by the largely made up terrorists they aim to frighten us with. We don't need to import US ideas on so-called homeland security, which have never been anything but an excuse for bullying authoritarianism.
Herbert Thornton
January 26th, 2008 1:42amAs I recall, some bigots in Britain, who didn't believe in multiculturalism - & didn't want to accept even Nazi culture being imported into Britain - had the nerve, between 1939 and 1945, to shoot down a large number German bombers over Britain.
This resulted in many poor, innocent German aircrews, who were merely sincerely acting in accordance with Nazi culture, being killed in what can only be called an orgy of Nazi-bashing.
I am surprised that there has been so little outcry from the politically correct about this gross violation of the aircrews' human rights.
To echo Iftikhar Ahmad's perceptive observation, - by shooting down all those Nazi bombers, we merely created further resentment and alienation.
There has not even been a apology. Is it not time for somebody like the Archbishop of Canterbury to take the lead?
Craig
January 29th, 2008 11:51amThroughout history there have always been groups who have felt the need to resort to whatever tactics will achieve their ends and however we call them – terrorists, rebels, freedom fighters, guerrillas – the result to innocent life has never changed. Since the attack on the World Trade Centre on 11th September 2001 (I’m using the UK calendar system here) ‘terrorism’ has taken the limelight in popular politics and the media solely (I believe) because it was the Americans that suffered this time. Let us not forget that for decades before this many nations were plagued by terrorist activity and no ‘War on Terror’ was ever declared. Indeed, the Americans insisted that we meet at the peace table with the IRA (whom many Americans saw as freedom fighters) and applauded when Nelson Mandela (labelled as ‘terrorist’ by the official, South African government) was elected president. However, putting the past behind us; while we focus our efforts on this – and other, global – issues we seem to be ignoring matters closer to home. More and more I pick up the papers and read of our youths terrorising local communities with anti-social and violent behaviour; more and more I hear of firsthand accounts of youths vandalising property or thumbing their noses at authority and the victims being told little or nothing can be done. What we need to be doing is putting our own house in order before we try to police the rest of the world or dictate to other nations how to rule their populations.
Davo
January 30th, 2008 8:15amSmith's discourse does on the non existence of Islamic terrorism puts Neville Chamberlain's "peace in our time" comments to shame, And all those anti Nazi bombings during the London blitz . Goodness me! one rediscovers the truth every day.
Davo
January 30th, 2008 8:20amNice one Herbert yes the wonders of cultural equivalence will enlighten us all!
David Morrison
February 22nd, 2008 3:20pmCon Couglin’s wrote: “Jonathan Evans, the newly appointed director-general of MI5, revealed in November that the number of terrorist suspects active in the UK had more than doubled to 4,000 in the past year”. That is not true. He actually said: “You may recall that in her speech this time last year, my predecessor, Eliza Manningham-Buller, pointed out that this country was facing an increasing threat from Al Qaida-inspired terrorism. When she spoke, MI5 had identified around 1,600 individuals who we believed posed a direct threat to national security and public safety, because of their support for terrorism. That figure today would be at least 2,000.”
Ian
March 19th, 2008 4:10pmThis all sounds very similar to what is happening in the USA and is designed to engender fear in to the public such that when necessary the government will be allowed to invoke special powers without recourse to the people. It is about control and part of the New World Order objective. All very sinister. Wake up!!