Allister Heath says that Brown’s poll tax on Britain’s 114,000 non-domiciled residents will drive away talent when our economy most needs it. Shame the Tories would do the same
Given how hard all economies, including Britain, strive to attract high-net-worth investors and the highly skilled these days, it is difficult to fathom why any government in its right mind would wish suddenly to begin penalising those it has sought to woo for so long. What is most absurd about this is that the Treasury readily acknowledges, in the very same document laying out its tax hike plans, that ‘in an increasingly globalised economy it is crucial for the UK’s competitiveness that the UK continues to attract international talent to this country’.
Rarely has there been a policy so glaringly incongruous with the government’s stated objective. In fact, no tax expert I have spoken to can recall any Treasury proposal in recent history which so openly and casually acknowledged it would trigger an exodus of thousands of successful and wealthy taxpayers.
Brown’s decision instead to play the class war card has gone down well in some quarters, including among middle-class professionals jealous of their non-dom neighbours’ tax privileges and angry at being priced out of the best homes and schools. But by making the City a less attractive place to work, and by signalling an ideological shift towards higher taxes on the wealthy, it bodes ill for the long-term future of the British economy.
Its impact will be compounded by the downturn that is now engulfing the City. An economy can just about afford to be nasty to the rich during boom times; it cannot do so when everything else is going wrong. With the credit crunch intensifying, mounting layoffs at investment banks and a sharp decline in confidence, the last thing the housing, arts and luxury goods markets need right now is for their best customers to up sticks.
Yet Brown is now considering adding an attack on offshore trusts to his poll tax plans, a development which has brought a smile to the faces of relocation experts. To the expatriate community and their wealth managers, the attack announced in the Pre-Budget Report now looks as if it was merely the first salvo in a long war of attrition. The fine print of the Treasury’s consultation document makes it clear that the screws could soon be tightened further.
For good measure, the assault on the non-doms is going hand in hand with a hike in capital gains tax, a rise in corporation tax on small companies, and a crackdown on the 29,000 non-residents who commute most weeks from Monaco or the Isle of Man. All of these changes add up to a simple message to the skilled, hard-working and above all footloose international talent to which today’s Britain owes so much of its success: don’t bother coming here, we don’t value you any longer.
More articles from: Allister Heath | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Lloyd Evans on the latest Spectator / Intelligence Squared debate
Millions travel to Medjugorje each year but, says Simon Caldwell, the world-famous pilgrimage site may soon be exposed as a fraud
Swearing and shouting are underrated, says Giles Coren. Four-letter words can be immensely satisfying and extraordinarily effective
The failure of the $700 billion bail-out has driven her former City-boy chums to despair, says Venetia Thompson. But they must rally soon to keep the market moving
Rod Liddle analyses the extraordinary list of mostly harmless words and phrases that are now considered inappropriate by one of our leading national newspapers
Our Times, by A.N. Wilson
Rod Liddle says that the hunt for this foul child molester is the symptom of an unhealthy and disproportionate fixation that has spawned all sorts of absurd rules and regulations
Channel 4 can’t afford Carol Vorderman and says it needs more cash for its public service remit. Nonsense, writes Neil Midgley: it is mass-market television that needs help
Christopher Silvester says you don’t have to be rich to invest in fine wine, and the rewards can be handsome
Margaret Thatcher - the Long Walk to Finchley (BBC4)
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
mark
January 25th, 2008 1:37amWhat happened to the flat-tax ideas? I loved the comment to the effect that making the tax system so simple granny could do it on her PC would release x,000 civil servants and tax inspectors to wealth creation rather than wealth reduction.
Rob Trimper
January 25th, 2008 2:41pmThere are in addition to todays high flyer non doms, a number of retired non doms who, have worked in the UK for decades decided to stay on in a country they have come to love. The government has pulled the rug out from under years of planning for a tax efficient retirement.
Laurie Macdonell-Sanchez
January 25th, 2008 3:04pmTruly INSANE! Where did this come from? Sounds like what the nasty Russkies did in Moscow @ the end of the IMF bailout in the '90s--tax to death the expats who were keeping the economy roaring, despite the worst efforts of the "post"-Soviet kleptocracy to foil the West’s attempts @ effecting the reforms & providing the stimuli that would permit establishment of a capitalist-style system. Maybe that IS where the idea came from(!?). Whereas in Russia the aim was to permit the cash-bloated powers-that-be (who never really relinquished the helm in ‘89) to return to the Soviet system, for the UK this is a shot in the head economically as well as a shot in the foot politically.
Michael Spencer-Smith
January 26th, 2008 2:17pmIn my view the removal of special tax treatment for so-called 'non-domiciled' residents who have lived here for decades is long overdue. This cringing attitude to the new overclass is entirely unnecessary. London will not stop being a financial centre as that is where the market infrastructure is, any more than it did when we refused to join the Euro, although many predicted the markets would move to Frankfurt. People can still come for shopping etc. It's just that if they want to live here, they will have to pay the same taxes as everyone else. What is wrong with that?
Fergus Pickering
January 27th, 2008 6:40pmExplain to me VERY SLOWLY why it would be so disastrous is some very rich foreign persons went to live in Dubai instead of living in London. Why should I care? How will it be bad for me? It might be, but how exactly?
T Hamilton
January 29th, 2008 4:43pmThis is a typical Labour move, no thought, no planning, just another empty headline. The effect of these non-dom taxes will drain the UK economically and push out talent. It is also affecting many non-dom’s who do not fall into a super wealthy category. They are being forced to move as they cannot afford to remain in the UK (particularly the retired community who have lived in the UK much of their lives married to Brits). It is also tragic that Cameron & co have missed the point (rather like the grammar school disaster).