Bryan Forbes says that the government’s ruling that incandescent light bulbs be phased out is a symptom of a world indulging its political lunacies — and it makes it too dark to read
Call me old-fashioned, as Dame Edna says, but I don’t fancy spending my remaining years in semi-darkness because this poxy government has performed yet another knee-jerk reaction and decreed that all incandescent light bulbs will be phased out, whether we like it or not. A warning bulletin from Defra informs us that should we be careless enough to break a long-life bulb, we must immediately vacate the room in which the tragedy occurs for at least 15 minutes. Then we are not allowed to vacuum up the broken glass because that will spread mercury droplets around the entire house. Instead we must don rubber gloves, sweep up the glass and place it in a sealed bag while making sure not to inhale any dust (does glass make dust?) before disposing of the toxic waste in a proper container. That is if by that time you haven’t lost the will to live. What joker writes this stuff? Can it be ghosted by Ed Balls to justify his surname?
More articles from: Bryan Forbes | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Rod Liddle says that metropolitan liberal ideology is too deeply ingrained in local councils, social services and the judiciary to be overturned by one panic measure driven by Labour’s sudden fear of the BNP
Cass Sunstein — co-author of the hugely influential Nudge and an adviser to President Obama — unveils his new theory of ‘group polarisation’, and explains why, when like-minded people spend time with each other, their views become not only more confident but more extreme
The acclaimed web theorist, Mark Earls, says that the death of Michael Jackson unleashed the extremes of collective action: mass mourning and sick jokes
In the first of an occasional series of interviews over meals, Deborah Ross talks to Dominic West about The Wire and the challenge to an Old Etonian of playing an American cop
My defining memory of Michael Jackson — vulnerable, brilliant, otherworldly — is of watching him dance to the soundtrack of a movie.
The big story of the European elections was the failure of the Lib Dems, says Ross Clark. Aspiring young politicians should sign up to Labour now with a view to running the country
Fraser Nelson says that the scale of public disgust at the MPs’ expenses scandal presents the next Prime Minister with a huge challenge — and a huge opportunity. If Cameron devolves power to voters, he will be rewarded. But if he fails, the punishment will be swift
Fraser Nelson says that the planned dirty tricks operation against the Tories has triggered an internal battle between a hard core of brutal factionalists and union officials around Brown and those who do not want to see the New Labour project vanquished by bully boys
In this extract from his Centre for Policy Studies lecture, Peter Oborne says that the great Tory sage and architect of Thatcherism was quite unlike the politicians of today
Tim Shipman says that Britain is now so overwhelmed by Islamist extremists and terrorist plots that our foreign policy has become subservient to our desperate need for intelligence
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Mike
January 24th, 2008 1:07pmJust brilliant!
Fiat Lux
January 24th, 2008 1:24pmThere are lots of websites where you can buy them - 30 seconds on Google will find them. Stock up now. As for all the other silly rules, we'll just have to learn to be more like the Italians i.e. find a way round them or ignore them.
Dwight Vandryver
January 24th, 2008 7:49pmIt needed saying - well done. In his conclusion, Mr. Forbes did not go far enough. The symptoms described are part of a recently discovered political tool used to mask the indecisiveness, inaction and incompetence of government. By convincing the individual that he or she is partly to blame for everything wrong in the world, thereby engendering a sense of personal guilt, the spotlight is turned away from those elected to manage national matters for us. For instance, they tell us that global warming is a direct consequence of our individual behaviour, but where are the new roads, where are the affordable city perimeter carparks with fast links to the centre, and where are the local railways? Instead, there are congestion charges, toll roads and a 67% fuel tax. We are not told that if the UK were to somehow be erased from the world atlas, the CO2 emissions would drop by less than 2.5% (one fortieth).
Philip Ogilvie
January 24th, 2008 9:41pmAn excellent article. It makes me think that Sibley's Law on giving capital to banks (Christopher Fildes, passim) applies even more so to paying taxes to the Government, especially, capital taxes.
mark
January 25th, 2008 1:27amWhere are we going? Why are we in this handbasket?
Brutum Fulmen
January 25th, 2008 2:19pmIf your government thinks that the compact fluorescent bulb is the final solution, it is indeed certifiable. However, technology will come to its rescue before 2011 (or whenever the deadline is), so that it will never actually have to be confined to an institution. The future lies in light-emitting diodes, which are quite bright enough to read by, and which contain no toxic mercury. At the moment they are far too expensive to be widely adopted, but the price should come down as demand increases and manufacturers start to enjoy large economies of scale. I suspect that your government knows all this perfectly well, and is chancing its arm about the timescale over which the projected price decreases will occur. That is, those responsible for the decisions are gamblers rather than fools. It would be most uncharitable to think otherwise.
Lizzie
January 26th, 2008 8:22amHow right you are, and it is only the tip of the nightmare iceberg we are hurtling towards! Why are we so poweless?
Roger Inkpen
January 27th, 2008 10:59amWhy oh why is this man not writing for the Daily Mail? I expect intelligent comment in the Speccie, not this this moronic ranting. If you want to blame somebody for the mess the world is in, blame yourself and your generation Mr Forbes. You've elected govts which have created this level of deceit and obfuscation over its citizens.
Darron Barnes
January 27th, 2008 4:19pmI could not agree more with Roger Inkpen comments above.
Mike Wade
January 27th, 2008 6:32pmA bit of a rant by Bryan Forbes, but fundamentally spot on. We need more such common sense, and less oppression by politically correct nonsense and ineffective "knee-jerk" initiatives. Mandating CFLs is probably even less sensible than building wind farms which only enable capital-intensive conventional power stations to run idle when the wind happens to blow. Consider the logic: Q: How are CFLs and incandescent bulbs different? A: CFLs produce far less heat for the same amount of light. Q: Where are most incandescent bulbs used? A: Inside our homes. Q: When are these lights mostly switched on? A: In the winter. Q: What else happens in the winter? A: We burn oil or gas to heat our homes. Conclusion: Fit CFLs and the main effect will be increased consumption of oil or gas to replace the heat previously provided by incandescent lights! Add to this the fact that CFLs are totally unsuitable for most chandeliers and other decorative light fittings (and in many cases do not physically fit), and the argument for stockpiling incandescent bulbs is irresistable ! Our politicians should focus on the radical and fundamental changes required to avert environmental disaster, rather than causing annoyance with largely ineffective short-term measures.
Sean
January 29th, 2008 11:04amClassic. Best piece I've read in some time.
Tim Hemry
January 29th, 2008 2:02pmDon't worry about the older folks who can't afford the new, more expensive bulbs. Your governemtn will tax you ever more to subsidize them.
Christopher Mercier
January 29th, 2008 2:55pmOh, yes. About that dust that they mention? Fluorescent bulbs eventually become covered in a white film of dust after sitting idle...or sitting in sockets. It becomes tainted with ultraviolet ray tinged mercury. I worked in stores that used fluorescent bulbs. when changing the bulbs you must wear gloves and wash hands immediately. The bulbs also have to be set aside from other waste/trash so they do not break. The reason for that is when they do break, what is essentially irradiated mercury vapor/dust gets in the air. Sounds like a fun time, no? Efficient? Terribly.
Dan Guenzel
January 29th, 2008 3:56pmI've long admired Bryan Forbes, enjoying for an example his ingratiating performance in that beautifully-photographed swashbuckler of old, SEA DEVILS, to that wonderful and intelligent film he made later on, SEANCE ON A WET AFTERNOON. How nice, then, to see him in print commenting on the lunacy of the lightbulbs. Mr Forbes has done a great service to us by writing this brilliant piece. I believe he should seriously consider making a film on the subject he has written about. He would do it very well, of that I am certain.
John Trainor
January 29th, 2008 6:46pmThis article really struck a nerve. I hate the florescent bulbs. In trying to buy the incandescent, I notice they are already less plentiful, already being phased out. President Bush has made some decisions that show such a lack of common sense and such betrayal of our individual freedoms. I can not wait for his last day in office. The continued deterioration of my nation's finances under this so-called fiscal conservative boggles the mind, but that's another subject.
l
January 29th, 2008 8:35pmIn Massachusetts, USA, the deadline coincides with the time a local incandescant bulb manufacturer chose to stop making them.
kEND
January 29th, 2008 11:12pmAn awakening is occurring. Thanks for the fuel.
Mike
January 30th, 2008 4:29amI'm a Yank, and saw a new report on the net a while back about the Australian government mandating this silly new bulbs.It took only milliseconds for my brain to realize that this idea was so appalling stupid and counter-productive as to be irresistable to my own government, an sure enough, here we are. Will a counter trend eventually develop, with people pointing out that the new bulbs do not in fact last forever, don't net out to save as much electricity as thought, give out funny radio frequency interference, and have bad effects on the human eye? To ask the question is to answer it. So the Aussies think they've topped us and can past stupider legislation than we can? Nonsense. Our record holds. Just look at our foreign policy and stand in awe. We'll never allow a stupidity gap to develop vis-a-vis the rest of the Anglosphere, so you Brits and ANZACs should give up trying
Max
January 30th, 2008 6:02amIt's all right, you won't feel a thing, incremental attacks on your freedom will make it easy.
Allan
January 31st, 2008 3:13pmCandles. We must go back to candles.
susan Latham-Richmond
September 15th, 2008 11:37amyou should have written a science fiction whereby on the lines of a rural community with a seperate community of experts filtering down technology so that it was entirely eco and safe while managing their numbers like gods... at the moment you have a swing between bureaucracy and laissez faire...i am another person who has been told not to earn a living or i will have income taken away that i am entirely dependent on..i suggest you take on s.a.d ethicalsuperstore bio bulbs and get happy in sumulated daylight sell your house and go and live on the sea out of range of all these gvts you sound like a cameron/queen boot boy still she gave you a c.b.e..what a low down journalistic trick to get into swing politics..