Rod Liddle is infuriated by a church leader who refuses to confront the inhumanity perpetrated in the name of Islam or the consequences — visible in Malaysia — of legal apartheid
I assume it is simply Dr Rowan Williams’s impressive beard which has persuaded everybody that he is an ‘intellectual’; certainly, it cannot be anything he has ever said or written. His latest contribution to the national reservoir of stupidity was the business about sharia law, of course. It was both inevitable and indeed desirable that the state would, somehow, devolve to our Muslim communities jurisdiction over certain — largely domestic — disputes, he opined. Cue a justifiable outrage. Then, apparently astonished at the furore, he issued a sort of Blairite apology, saying that the ghastly media had ‘distorted’ his speech (nope, it really hadn’t) but that he regretted an ‘unclarity’ over words which he may have ‘clumsily deployed’. What a fatuous old goat he is. If he is incapable of expressing himself clearly, then it is because his thought processes are hopelessly muddled — if they exist at all. In short, he is little more than a posh John Prescott in a black dress.
More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Melissa Kite meets Martina Navratilova, nine times Wimbledon singles champion and now pioneer of ‘tennising’ — an artistic technique that creates Jackson Pollock-style patterns
James Forsyth talks to Scott McClellan, former press secretary to the President, about his new book attacking the Bush administration, its methods and its deceits
Lord Lloyd of Berwick says that the government’s emergency legislation to overturn their lordships’ ruling on witness anonymity is part of a ‘gradual usurpation’ of our liberties
In the week of the Spectator Summer Party, Steven Berkoff recalls another of our celebrations at which he sought out the Tory leader and forgave his confusion of Brando and Dean
Rod Liddle says that it helps to be aged between 14 and 30, white and male. Being drunk and argumentative speeds things along. And no public policy seems to dissuade those who do the stabbing
It’s draconian, expensive and ineffective, says David Davis. All the evidence shows that the Prime Minister is eroding our civil liberties pointlessly
On the eve of the General Synod and the Lambeth Conference, Theo Hobson says that the sleeping giant of evangelical and orthodox Anglicanism has been awoken by liberal agitation and Rowan Williams’s failed leadership. The church is damaged beyond repair
Classic Serial (BBC Radio 4)
In her only print interview, Jacqui Smith tells Matthew d’Ancona that her proposal for the detention of terror suspects does not undermine Magna Carta, that she is ‘frustrated’ by Lord Goldsmith, and that the ‘West Midlands housewife’ is a better judge of the threat than MPs
Saying ‘sorry’ is mostly wicked and usually irrelevant, says Anna Blundy. People should not be allowed to dump their inner shame so easily
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Cicero
February 14th, 2008 3:09pmA great joy to read this. Good on yer Rod. Keep on sticking it to these waffling, pumped-up, self-righteous pseuds.
Herbert Thornton
February 14th, 2008 6:00pmI found one of these questions and it's required answer on another web site, so I checked it in my family's Book of Common Prayer.
Sure enough it - and several others - were there, under the heading - "The form of ordaining or consecrating of an Archbishop or Bishop."
Three of these questions and their required answers are below.
I presume that on his consecration as Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams both heard the questions and gave the required answers -
"ARE you persuaded that you be truly called to this Ministration, according to the will of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the order of this Realm?"
Answer. "I am so persuaded."
"WILL you then faithfully exercise yourself in the same holy scriptures, and call upon God by prayer, for the true understanding of the same; so that you may be able by them to teach and exhort with wholesome doctrine, and to withstand and convince the gainsayers?"
Answer. "I will do so by the help of God."
"ARE you ready, with all faithful diligence, to banish and drive away all erroneous and strange doctrine contrary to God’s Word; and both privately and openly to call upon and encourage others to the same?"
Answer: "I am ready, the Lord being my helper."
Words that surely cry out for attention are "the order of this Realm"; "withstand and convince the gainsayers"; and "drive away all erroneous and strange doctrine".
It seems to me that this Archbishop has either forgotten those words, or deliberately abandoned them. Even worse, did he even believe in them in the first place, so that his answers were lies?
ian skidmore
February 14th, 2008 7:47pmThi is just silly and quite unworthy of Liddle whose work I usually admire. TheArchbishop ws opening a debate whiuch is perfeclty proper. I do not agree with his proposition but will defend etc.......
Our Man in Lisbon
February 15th, 2008 1:08amGood to see Liddle back on form. Interesting that this Skidmore fellow defends the A of C for opening the debate yet condemns Liddle for joining it.
John, Basingstoke
February 15th, 2008 9:09amI cannot agree more, this bumbling fool has aroused such anger in me, well,my utterances exploded into unprintable expletitives over this appeasement driven moron who mimicks and leads the ridiculous bunch of "Neville Chamberlist" tree huggers that control the Church of England today and drive it to even lower disrepute and scorn. For the record my great grandfather was a Bishop, how he must be squirming over this sorry now irrelavent institution.
ian skidmore
February 15th, 2008 11:48amIf only Liddle ha joined he debate tis Skidmore fellow would have been delighted, but then he believes that name calling has no place in intelligent discourse.
Richard Walker
February 15th, 2008 3:36pmLiddle’s brilliant analysis would be so uplifting were not the implications of the Archbishop utterances so depressing. Not only has Williams damaged the Church of England, betrayed his own Bishops and endangered the lives of Christians throughout the world, he now shrouds his stupidity behind the word unclarity. How honest of this intellectual man of God! Let us hope that he is encouraged to resign since there are excellent candidates who have the competences to lead the Church of England. York, Rochester and London come to mind.
Michael W Stone BA FBIS
February 15th, 2008 4:41pmWhat's new about the majority ethnic groupd discrimuinating against itself? I thought that was how things had been in Britain ever since the Race Relations industry got started. As for Malaysia, by Rod's own statement Moslem and non-Moslem live together in prosperity and with little ethnic tension. Sounds pretty good. No doubt the system has its injustices but what system doesn't? Do mothers fare any worse in Malaysian custody cases that fathers often do in British ones? It all sounds perfectly workable, and appears to be keeping the peace, so if that's what the Archbishop was advocating, it would seem an entirely reasonable suggestion. BTW I am not an Anglican.
Simplicius
February 15th, 2008 4:44pmOh, yes, Williams does seem to make it up as he goes along, and doesn't seem to be particularly interested in Christianity. I loved the following article about how Williams went to China and declared the Christians had become "freer" to practice Christianity....he kowtows a little too often, and, it seems, to the wrong people. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/24/wrowan24.xml
rosemary
February 19th, 2008 3:27pmMay I suggest people read the Archbishop's lecture to lawyers on Faith and the Law, and then read the Pope's lecture to scientists on Faith and Reason? They will then be able to compare their respective academic scholarship and intelligence.
Barry
February 20th, 2008 5:51pmAround the time of the speech I got a Mint card. Perhaps this is all my fault?
Nick ( Forward in Faith )
February 24th, 2008 10:26pmSurely the prime requirement of all bishops( including archbishops) is to preach the Gospel of Christ,not to be an apologist for Islam or any other religion.Respect their right to choose their own religion yes.British law is based on CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES AND THOSE CHOOSING to live here must accept this fact and abide by BRITISH LAW WHICH HAS STOOD THE TEST OF TIME