I know why the government wants to send homosexuals back to Iran to be hanged
Gays are law-abiding, better-educated than the norm, economically productive and tend to be less of a drain on the state, says Rod Liddle. They don’t stand a chance in this country
Another adherent to this left-liberal double-think is Peter Tatchell, the boss of the radical gay organisation Outrage, and the chap who has — predictably and laudably — led the campaign against Kazemi’s deportation. Tatchell once called upon Muslims to make common cause with homosexuals because they were both, uh, persecuted minorities. Much as I admire Tatchell, I do not think that a wacky sense of humour ranks among his many qualities, so I assume he was serious about that. It is such a fantastically stupid and deluded notion, but one common to many on the Left.
Tatchell has stood as a Green party candidate in Oxford and is presumably still a party member. The Greens recently threw their lot in with Ken Livingstone, in his bid to become re-elected as Mayor of London. Ken is not himself a homophobe, so far as I know, but he continues to invite to London Muslim clerics who support the murder of homosexuals and defends them for their views. In other words, he promotes fascistic and homophobic Islamic speakers. If Tatchell — who has done perhaps more than any single individual to counter discrimination against gays and Muslims worldwide — were true to his beliefs, he would endorse Boris Johnson’s campaign instead. Boris is a metropolitan libertarian and homosexuality is not an issue for him at all. But Tatchell presumably thinks that Islam’s proscriptions against homosexuality are an unfortunate historic aberration — an example of false consciousness, perhaps — and that ‘underneath’, Muslims think gay people are absolutely fine and tickety-boo. Read Mohammed’s hadiths, Pete.
But, still, the question remains: should we allow Iranian homosexuals asylum? Given the general warp and weft of the government’s current policy towards asylum seekers, the answer is a clear ‘no’. People who seem to the public to have either a historic right to stay in Britain, either because of their own valour on behalf of our country or because of some ghastly malefaction occasioned by the close of our empire are always barred: Gurkhas, Hong Kong Chinese, black Zimbabweans. Algerians, Libyans, Pakistanis and so on who want to kill us all, and even tell the courts they wish to kill us all, are allowed to remain, in case they themselves are bumped off when they return to the hellholes from which they emanated. The government’s policy — and the law of the land — on this sort of thing is, you have to say, beguilingly counter-intuitive. Paedophiles? Yep, in you come. Bombers — welcome. People who fought for us for a pittance, nope.
More articles from: Rod Liddle | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Thank goodness we can have a run on the pound when we need one
Martin Vander WeyerMartin Vander Weyer looks ahead to next week’s Pre-Budget Report and reflects on George Osborne’s contentious remarks about the devaluation of sterling. It looks like Gordon Brown is getting away with his borrowing binge — leaving the Tories isolated
I loved Oliver Stone’s Bush film — and I know why the critics hated it
Rod LiddleThe movie W. did not provide the crude anti-Bush agitprop that the reviewers craved, says Rod Liddle. This was precisely its strength: we need to get inside the minds even of those we most deplore
The great Tory tax and spend battle: seconds out...
Fraser Nelson and Daniel FinkelsteinIn the wake of Cameron’s decision to drop his pledge to match Labour spending, Fraser Nelson and Daniel Fin kelstein of the Times trade rhetorical blows over the issue that is gripping and troubling the Conservative party as it adjusts to the transformed economic context
Where is our inspiration when we most need it?
Bryan ForbesBryan Forbes remembers listening to Churchill as a 14-year-old evacuee and now looks with envy at Obama’s capacity to galvanise hope. Where are his UK counterparts?
For a bit of perspective, try thinking Jurassic
Christopher LloydThe first takeaways originated about 150 million years ago, says Christopher Lloyd; global travel is pretty ancient, too. And as for democracy...
Want to cut taxes? First cut spending. Here’s how
Fraser NelsonAfter a week of clamorous competition between the parties over tax cuts, Fraser Nelson offers a guide to paying for them: a programme of spending cuts that would preserve core services but shave off the fat of the Brown years. All that is needed is political will
There is nothing magic about this Keynesian fad
Tim CongdonLast week, The Spectator said that ‘Keynesianism is not the answer’. Here, Tim Congdon says the government’s economic recovery strategy is a sham based on outmoded leftist thinking
Welcome to the new austerity era, Mr Cameron
Fraser NelsonFraser Nelson says that the Tory leader must not be tempted by a ‘safety first’ strategy at his conference in Birmingham. The global financial crisis has transformed the political context and left an opening for the Conservatives to promise true radicalism and to be proudly bold
Brown has exploited immigration to hide from deep problems
Fraser NelsonThe PM’s claim to have created three million British jobs is a grave deceit, says Fraser Nelson. Strip out immigrants from the picture, and Labour has barely dented the problem of British worklessness. Over to you, Mr Cameron
Don’t mention the Afghan–Pakistan war
Fraser NelsonBoth Britain and America are reluctant to admit it but, says Fraser Nelson, our most pressing foreign policy problem is what to do about Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state in which terrorists have taken sanctuary
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Matthew Wilson
March 27th, 2008 11:01amJudging by the following Guardian Comment Is Free article from Wednesday, you and Tatchell are on the same side, Rod.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/peter_tatchell/2008/03/galloways_iranian_propaganda.html
EyeSee
March 27th, 2008 1:10pmHomosexuality exists. Whether it is right or wrong is a philosophical debate (well OK, not in the UK as freedom of speech is an outdated concept). To oppose someone's status of persecution because of it would be ridiculous. Certainly as mad as forcing a societal change based on a 'genetic' tic. It is suggested that we leave gays alone and I agree; they should not be distressed nor should society be altered to accomodate their preferences.Personally, I'm not wealthy and I think it is persecution that I'm not.
John Thomas
March 27th, 2008 3:17pmSo Rod swallows the bogus idea that homosexuality is a product of genes, ie. one's genetic make-up, the "this is my nature" theory - doesn't he know about the Three Myths of Homosexuality (That it is inherent, That it is impossible to reject, That it is just a life-style choice as valid as any other with no medical/physical hazaards). Even the "committed" (ie biased, politicised) American Psychologucal Association has recently conceded, apparently, that people can successfully become ex- (or post-) gay if they choose; it is now ex-gays who hide in the closet (to escape the mauling of the gay mafia), but increasingly, it seems, some ex-gays are daring to venture out ... Things are the other way round, now.
Strawsonian
March 27th, 2008 4:53pmNice alias, John Thomas. But how's this for a radical notion: whether homosexuality is a genetic predisposition or a lifestyle choice, what its practitioners get up to as consenting adults is no one else's business. In a free society, if you don't violate JS Mill's harm principle that should be the end of the story. That should be a conservative as well as a liberal position. Not sure why it seems to be so hard for some people to accept. Religion is no excuse.
D Shortd
March 27th, 2008 9:51pmI agree with Gore Vidal, who said there is no such thing as a homosexual, only homosexual acts.
And something on of Kingsley Amis's character said bears repeating: 'A penis is a wonderful thing. The only trouble is that there's a man at the end of it'.
mark
March 28th, 2008 12:22amread this alongside Selbourne's article,,,,,,,what's the answer? I dunno - except sending people back to be hanged can't be right - but mayb getting tougher with the hangers supporters here is part of the solution?
Stan Coveney
March 28th, 2008 3:03pmRod, your thesis is in general that homosexuals are and will be less of a burden on taxpayers than other groups in society.
Let’s be generous and assume that 5% of the UK population is homosexual and lesbian, say some 3 million souls.
The number of people living with HIV in the UK is now around 70,000 and let’s say that 80% of them are homosexual and lesbian, that is 56,000.
In 2000 it was estimated that each HIV infection prevented saves between £500,000 and £1 million over a lifetime.
If Mehdi Kazemi were to stay in the UK and if he were contract HIV within 12 months then the cost to the UK taxpayer over his lifetime would far outweigh the tax contributions of many other homosexual and lesbian taxpayers and his own contributions.
Mr Grumpy
March 29th, 2008 12:11amGood apart from the stuff about dependents. Kids are not 'dependents', they are the precondition for any of us being able to retire. Gays are in the same position as childless heterosexuals (like me): either we're planning to work till we drop, or we're freeloaders.
Craig
March 29th, 2008 12:35amIt is worrying. We have the similar situation with opposition party members seeking asylum in this country from Mugabe's regime. It is our duty to send a message and propagate people that are sufferers within oppressive regimes, with the courage to challenge oppressor. Sending these people back to these oppressive places will result in a direct failure of our prime objective, to promote democratic will in others.
If we send these people back we will have turned our backs on them.
David Short
March 30th, 2008 5:08pmMr Grumpy's economics come out of the Stone Age, or at least the agricultural one. People used to have children in order that they could provide for them and look after them in 'old age'. Now we have money, investments and property. You can rely on those; in fact, so will your offspring well into their adulthood, even when they are not wastrels, which many are.
'Kids' today are valued more for their cuteness and diversion when young, rather than for any damned practical or financial use later in the parents' life.
That cute period is rather short, the dependency age is much, much longer and it bleeds people in their 50s and 60s, who otherwise would be living it up in the sun, especially if divorced, dry before nature does that to them.
HKA
March 30th, 2008 10:40pmStan Coveney - in the interests of accuracy, suggest you have a look at the NSO figures on HIV. The majority of cases presently registered in the UK are heterosexual. The majority of new heterosexual cases presenting for treatment are immigrants - mainly it seem, from Africa and Asia.
TDK
March 31st, 2008 10:24amIt seems to me that the majority of failed asylum seekers and illegal immigrants are not being deported, and where the government does act it frequently seems to do so in cases like Mehdi Kazemi's where the case appears pretty compelling to allow leave to stay.
I wonder how the authorities prioritise these cases. Perhaps the vast majority of cases really are lower priority than Mehdi Kazemi's, because they do have better claims to asylum. Or perhaps a bureaucracy, who don't really believe in deportation, deliberately expedite cases like this one because they calculate that the adverse publicity thus attracted will tend to undermine demand to deport anyone at all.
Ujima
March 31st, 2008 2:03pmTatchell has The Guardian to thank for the continued persecution of gay Muslims in places like Iran.
The more praise they get in the Western media, the more extreme the regime gets because they can see they are winning.
Sorry, Peter, you are an arch hypocrite for having a love-in with The Guardian.
Familiar Clown
April 2nd, 2008 6:38pmThey do a nice line in hanging homosexuals by crane in the Islamic Republic of Iran. BTW don't take that swine Ahmadinejad's word for anything.
Cllr Steve Radford - President of The Liberal Party
May 16th, 2008 11:38amDelighted to read the Spectator article, When I saw "progressive" Ken Livingstone sucking up to clerics whose only ambiguity on Homosexuals was whether we sould be flung off a cliff or stoned to death, it gave me a sense of wanting to vomit.
We need everyone to stand up for refugess flying for their lives, including gays from Islam