Vassi Chamberlain was taken to task by the poor little Greek boy over her powers of social observation. On reflection, she concedes that snobbery has never truly gone out of fashion
I was recently upbraided in this magazine by your High Life columnist, a person I’ve liked and admired for many years, regarding a piece I’d written for Tatler on the ski resort of Gstaad. Taki can sometimes get painfully close to the bone, but he let me off lightly. His point was that I hadn’t understood what made the place tick because only the new-money arrivistes had spoken, as opposed to the chic old lot who had run for the hills. This was an interesting point. I’d assumed that we, not just as a nation but as human beings, had grown out of or at least softened our attitude to snobbery. I thought that we had stopped instinctively revering the old and rubbishing the new. As it turns out I’d been as stupid as David Cameron believing that his goal of a classless Britain was remotely achievable. How could I have been so naive?
The idea for the Gstaad piece came from a colleague who had been a guest in one of the resort’s swankier chalets at Christmas. My editor asked me to write the introduction (I’ve skied there virtually every year for the last 27, although admittedly for no more than a week at a time) and my colleague would write about the various hostesses.
In the last five years Gstaad has been invaded by the new rich London crowd that outbids itself for £10 million properties in Chelsea, Holland Park and Notting Hill. It’s a set riven with petty jealousies, in-fighting and Olympian spending (yachts, private planes, £10,000 fake logs in marble fireplaces). When skiing they think nothing of hiring a private ski instructor for each of their children (why bother with ski school when you might miss a showing-off opportunity with your own guide?) and buying £300 ski jackets for five-year-olds with real fur-trimmed hoodies. The twin central obsessions are money and vanity. It used to be an old-style glamorous and fun place, but now it’s also self-indulgent and ridiculous.
Even Taki agrees with me on this point. There’s plenty of old money and very chic people to keep Gstaad’s heritage going for a bit longer, but there’s also even more new money, which by the old money’s standard is deplorably un-chic. With all this money racism, you’d have thought they’d have had to put up the Swiss equivalent of the Berlin Wall. But here’s the rub. Both factions co-exist quite happily and go to each other’s parties. Until, that is, somebody links their names in print. The issue has proved so incendiary that there has apparently been little other conversation this season.
More articles from: Vassi Chamberlain | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Melissa Kite meets Martina Navratilova, nine times Wimbledon singles champion and now pioneer of ‘tennising’ — an artistic technique that creates Jackson Pollock-style patterns
James Forsyth talks to Scott McClellan, former press secretary to the President, about his new book attacking the Bush administration, its methods and its deceits
Lord Lloyd of Berwick says that the government’s emergency legislation to overturn their lordships’ ruling on witness anonymity is part of a ‘gradual usurpation’ of our liberties
In the week of the Spectator Summer Party, Steven Berkoff recalls another of our celebrations at which he sought out the Tory leader and forgave his confusion of Brando and Dean
Rod Liddle says that it helps to be aged between 14 and 30, white and male. Being drunk and argumentative speeds things along. And no public policy seems to dissuade those who do the stabbing
In spite of their commanding poll lead, the Tories are terrified of seeming complacent. But, as Fraser Nelson discloses, work is well advanced on a first-term plan for government in which education reform and a welfare revolution will be the centrepieces
In the first of an occasional series, Martin Rowson interviews Ann Widdecombe while drawing her at the same time. But this two-pronged satirical strategy does not faze the cult Tory
Dominic Grieve, the new shadow home secretary, tells James Forsyth that he won’t ‘resort to soundbites’. But is this a sensible approach for a modern-day politician?
Lloyd Evans reports on the latest Spectator / Intelligence Squared event
Marianne Macdonald says that, in an encounter in New York with Sarah Jessica Parker, she realised, finally, how much of a myth Sex and the City really was
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Evelyn Powell
March 28th, 2008 1:26amMiss Chamberlain just doesn't get it. The subtext of this faux apology is that she is right and Taki is wrong. That could never be. In legal parlance, it is not an admission, nor a confession and avoidance, but a denial. Her belief is that if there are nuances of behaviour and values which distinguish some people from others, there shouldn't be. Which leads of course to the lowest common denominator, multicultural, identity-free, vulgarian society of rock star "celebrities", reality television, estuary english and the tabloids which England has deliquesced into and which is lamented in your leading article today.
Noblesse Oblige
March 28th, 2008 6:13amSince when was it snobbery for persons of patrician provenance and mien to deplore and avoid the appalling pachyderm gatecrashing of nouveaux and arrivistes? That's not snobbery, it's just good sense. Miss Chamberlain soes not know what snobbery is. At its worst it is an exaggerated regard for people on account of their supposed social position or wealth. On that basis, it is the nouveau and the arriviste who are the snobs, not those in whose society they aspire to find acceptance. It is why the Blairs never found acceptance, for they are snobs within that definition, and were seen to be vulgar arrivistes. The other, slightly less pernicious, sort of snobbery looks down on people for the reason that they do not possess social position or wealth. Both sorts are foolish, and show a want of intellect and breeding. I commend Miss Chamberlain to Christopher Sykes's biography of Evelyn Waugh for an interesting analysis of snobbery amongst the English. He posthumously castigated his friend Waugh for his weakness in this regard.