Gerald Warner says that Scotland’s Conservatives, far from standing their ground on devolution, have jumped with relish on the gravy train of the Holyrood parliament
‘I think my vision of Conservatism is largely moulded by a desire to make it relevant to a devolved Scotland,’ she has said. Yet devolution has been disastrous for Scotland. Holyrood is a joke, its MSPs the butt of bitter humour in every pub and club. The Tories are in the unusual position for any political party of having been proved right in their predictions, but now they are ashamed of the fact. Whenever you hear anybody in Scotland say, ‘We must make devolution work,’ you know it is a Tory MSP speaking. Nobody else talks like that now.
The rot lies within the parliamentary party at Holyrood, which has created an increasingly fissiparous schism between itself and Conservative voters. Well-cushioned MSPs have found it convenient to subscribe to the myth of devolution as the settled popular will. Yet that is a Labour lie. At the first devolution referendum in 1979, only 33 per cent of the electorate supported a Scottish parliament. At the second referendum in 1997 it was still endorsed only by a minority of the electorate (1.7 million out of 4 million). At no time has devolution ever commanded the support of a majority of the Scottish electorate.
Nobody suggests it would be serious politics today for the Conservatives to crusade for the abolition of the Scottish parliament: such is human nature that Scots would probably cling jealously to a seriously flawed institution on the chauvinist instinct that, though imperfect, it is theirs. Yet there are innumerable other scenarios the Scottish Tories could have promoted, to the discomfiture of their opponents and the approval of the public.
Instead, they have flirted with the notion of ‘full fiscal autonomy’, a euphemism for handing all powers of taxation north of the border to the spendthrifts at Holyrood who have already raised business rates to a level more than 10 per cent above England. The claim is that this would increase ‘accountability’. Really? Like the accountability of local councils, do they mean? The fiscal reality is that in Scotland, out of an electorate of 4 million, only 2.3 million pay tax; 22 per cent of people of working age are claiming a key benefit or are in receipt of a tax credit; and 23 per cent of the workforce is in the public sector. Where is the constituency there for fiscal continence?
More articles from: Gerald Warner | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
David Tang reflects on his visits to Beijing in the run-up to the Games, where Western expertise has been harnessed to the ruthless efficiency of China’s government machine
The economist Richard Thaler — a favourite of the Cameron and Obama camps — talks to James Forsyth about the power of ‘nudging’: small transformative acts of persuasion
Fraser Nelson on the coming political week
Lloyd Evans joins the dissident movement in a ritual exercise near the Chinese Embassy. He is unsettled to find himself understanding why China’s rulers get so paranoid about them
Mark Leonard, Britain’s pre-eminent analyst of modern China, says the Olympic genie is out of the bottle. The prospect of global scrutiny has actually increased repression as the authorities try to stamp out dissent. But digital technology is impossible to police
The Conservatives think that education is about selecting the lucky few, says Ed Balls. But there is no reason why excellence and opportunity shouldn’t be for all
Michael Bloomberg, the Mayor of New York, unveils his new partnership with Boris, and their plans to forge a transatlantic alliance between the two greatest cities on earth to promote state-of-the-art public policy, cultural links and economic prosperity
If Scotland is to be independent, then why not London? And good luck to what’s left
Stanley Johnson is adjusting to his new constitutional position in the life of London: not least deciding which clubs to avoid at lunchtime in order to dodge Boris’s journalist foes
David Cameron talks to Fraser Nelson about his local election triumphs, admits that he is not going to ‘agree on everything’ with the new Mayor of London, and says Boris should join the queue to become PM after him
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Jonny English
April 10th, 2008 9:47amWhy don't they all just bugger off.
Derek Tomnay
April 11th, 2008 9:31amEngland should fear nothing from Scottish independence. The subsidised scots should go their own way. The Conservative party should defend England as there is no advantage in continually maintaining the union. Without Scotland the Conservatives could govern England for ever more.
John F Aberdeen
April 11th, 2008 12:37pmAs a Conservative supporter I agree with most of what Mr Warner has written.
In the last elections I voted SNP in order to defeat the labour MSP and local Lib Dem councillor.
My biggest anger and frustration is at the stupid antics of the Tory party in Scotland. What the hell are they doing aligning themselves with our enemies (labour and Lib-dems) in this independence commission.
Scottish political life has for too long be dominated by a self serving clique and an incompetent, often corrupt clique at that, which includes a backward leaning, uncritical and subserviant media. Wittness people going from media jobs to political jobs and back again,, Labour leaders holidaying with BBC,s Wark.
Brown, Blair and the rest of the Nulab and Lib-dem gangs were happy through the 1980,s to foster anti-english sentiments,, the english were a good cover for the real problems in scotland,, mostly generated by the local incompetent, backward, socialist, freemasonary dominated Scottish clique that have been running the country for decades.
Then Brown, Blair etall let the independance genie out of the bottle and now the English are (understandably) up in arms using the same insults today as scots were (and some still are) using in the 1980,s and 90,s
It would be constructive for those of us in scotland, who hate Socialism and want to destroy it, if the Tory party would come up with sensible policies that address the problems of today.
Firstly they should have nothing to do with the Labour/Dem clique and get out of that commission.
Secondly, propose that the Barnett formula be scrapped. As a believer in conservative principles, I don,t believe in subsidies.
Third, propose that the scottish parliament be allowed to cover its expenditures by raiseing all taxes in scotland,, yes that means all taxes including North Sea Oil (North of the border), whiskey etc.
Fourth, look at separating all other taxes eg, road fund licence, petrol taxes etc even Vat.
Yes lets have competition between the countries, like there is between the North and South of Ireland.
There are arguments about whether or not Scotland can survive on its own through raising its own taxes,, well its time we found out,, take away the pathetic scottish winge of blaming the English, with all revenues and expenditure being controlled in Scotland then that fig leaf has gone.
Fifth, Combine the MP and MSP roles so that MP/MSP,s only attend the UK parliament in a senate. This would leave English MPs to attend to their own business.
I know the above looks like being independant, however, unless the Tory party in scotland opens its brains to new independant thinking based on good tory principles of freedom, self reliance and individual independance from high taxes and petty fogging regulations and public sector jobsworths, instead of linking with the failed Lab/Lib Dem clique then the SNP will continue to enjoy the sight of the scots and english shouting insults and the UK breaking up.
Finally,, I hope Tory supporters (The ones Goldie and the other comfortable Tory MSP,s dont care about) in other constituancies consider following my tactical voting,, especially in seats held by Brown, Darling, Kennedy, in fact all seats held by Labour and the Lib Dems,,, they set out to destroy the UK for their own political purposes,, its up to us Scots who hate scoialism to destroy them.
Frankly I would like to vote conservative in scotland, but cannot see any good reason for doing so.
My biggest desire is to see Mr Cameron elected as PM in place of Brown, surely our worst PM ever and if that means voting SNP in the short term to get 2 parties of socialists out, we can deal with the 3rd socialist party after the Tory victory in England.
Scottish Conservative (Vichy branch)
April 11th, 2008 4:41pmUtter nonsense from start to finish.
Mr. Warner spends most of the first half of this piece berating the Scottish Conservatives for backing devolution - Armageddon turns into the settled will of the Scottish people, that its only the perks the MSPs get that explain the Partys support for it, that the Party got more votes when it opposed it than it does now and that there is a link between this change in position and the falling levels of support.
And then without a hint of irony our sage proclaims that nobody thinks it would be serious politics to call for Holyroods abolition. So why then all the complaints about the Party accepting devolution if u yourself accept it ye big appeaser ye.
We then have my personal favourite "Yet there are innumerable other scenarios the Scottish Tories could have promoted, to the discomfiture of their opponents and the approval of the public." Eh? like what? fewer powers? surely that would induce the same public reaction as abolition. saying it should never have been created whilst still opposing its abolition? come on now!! I would be extremely interested in these innumerable alternatives u tell us r available as i cant think of them.
We r then informed that in pubs and clubs ppl hate the msps. well yes they r particualrly useless n ppl dont like politicians neway. but this doesnt mean they favour the abolition of holyrood. the last 2 polls had 6% and 9% respectively supporting abolition so the Warner Party will be losing deposits across the land by the looks of it.
The confused thinking continues with the ludicrous argument that because Holyrood didnt pass a 50% of the overall electorate hurdle thereby it lacks popular support. Gerald it got 75% approval at the referendum amongst those who turned out. according to your logic there wouldnt be a legitimate government in the western world outside australia. even if not everyone voted virtually noone wants it abolished - apparently not even u. but since u spend most of ur article berating its existence only to say it wouldnt be serious to abolish it i am at a loss as to what u r advocating. what is ur point?
and please spare us these infantile references to vichy and munich - alex salmond is not adolf hitler, scottish independence would not be world war 2 and so these obtuse parallels only serve to further discredit ur already weak argument.
James
April 11th, 2008 10:02pmThis article reads like that from some bitter politics student.
If you seriously think the Scottish people didn't support having their own Parliament then you're utterly deluded and need to grow up.
David McEwan Hill
April 11th, 2008 10:16pmMr Warner has been writing absolute nonsense for a few years now and this offering is no different. He writes to reinforce the idiotic prejudices of a handful of antidiluvian relics and gets paid handsomely for his efforts,but nobody in Scotland pays any attention to him. I hope the English don't make the mistake of doing so.
There is nothing unTory about supporting Scottish Independence (or sturdy self-reliance if you prefer it described like that).
Michael Hill
April 15th, 2008 1:04amThe League of the South supports Scottish Independence. See www.dixienet.org. It's Scotland's right to run her affairs as she sees fit.