Gerald Warner says that Scotland’s Conservatives, far from standing their ground on devolution, have jumped with relish on the gravy train of the Holyrood parliament
The Scottish Play has degenerated into a farce and the indigenous Tories have lost the plot. When the constitutional future of the United Kingdom moved centre-stage in late 2007, Unionists were heartened by the deftness of touch David Cameron brought to this issue. It contrasted with the directionless drift of his supposed allies in the Scottish Conservative and Unionist party, which is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Scottish separatist tendency.
The Scottish Tories have gone native. In the run-up to the devolution referendum on 11 September 1997, they proclaimed vociferously that the creation of a devolved parliament would end civilisation as we had known it. By 12 September, in the immediate wake of the success of the devolutionist campaign, Armageddon was magically transformed into the ‘settled will of the Scottish people’ and a welcome reform in which the Scottish Conservatives would enthusiastically participate.
Conversions do not come any more Damascene. A strong incentive was supplied by the voting system created for the Scottish parliament. Of the 129 places at Holyrood, 73 are directly elected constituency seats on the Westminster model, but 56 are so-called ‘regional’ seats, allocated to parties under the D’Hondt system of proportional representation, with Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) appointed off closed lists by party leaders.
So, when the Tories failed to win any constituency seats at the first Scottish election in 1999 but were compensated with 18 list seats, these unelectables quickly recognised a system under which they could prosper. Soon they were enjoying the salaries and allowances (only a complete duffer could fail to earn at least £100,000 a year from Holyrood’s generous provision) and even queuing up to collect the medals that MSPs modestly awarded themselves at the inauguration of the parliament.
From that beginning, Tory MSPs have bedded in comfortably. It was a symptom of their successful acclimatisation to the political dependency culture that party leader David McLetchie had to resign when his travel expenses, largely consisting of taxi fares, were found to have exceeded £11,000. His successor, Annabel Goldie, has expanded collaboration with the enemy to Vichy proportions.
More articles from: Gerald Warner | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Thirty years after the mass suicides and murders in Guyana, Barry Isaacson unveils a cache of letters he found in his LA home, mapping the pain of one of the families
Rod Liddle says it is no surprise that Gordon Brown has ended up as surly and suspicious as he has: the memoirs of John Prescott, Lord Levy and Cherie Blair are appalling acts of treachery and avarice
Tim Walker talks to Greta Scacchi about her new role in The Deep Blue Sea, the gaucheness of Bill Murray — and being offered the lead in Basic Instinct
Fraser Nelson says that the 38-year-old Work and Pensions Secretary is the best candidate to succeed Gordon Brown. Already surging ahead at his department, he has the gift of sounding like an ordinary human being — and he understands the Cameron Conservative party
Joan Collins lives an actor's life
Advertisement
If Scotland is to be independent, then why not London? And good luck to what’s left
Stanley Johnson is adjusting to his new constitutional position in the life of London: not least deciding which clubs to avoid at lunchtime in order to dodge Boris’s journalist foes
David Cameron talks to Fraser Nelson about his local election triumphs, admits that he is not going to ‘agree on everything’ with the new Mayor of London, and says Boris should join the queue to become PM after him
Kelvin MacKenzie says that his fury over an extortionate hike in parking prices drove him to stand for election to Elmbridge Borough Council
As nationalities proliferate, the English want their turn, says Rod Liddle — who considers himself British first. St George’s Day and ‘Englishness’ have been partially decontaminated, but we are no closer to a definition of what ‘England’ is — and quite right too
Bush Hall Hotel - traditional quality country house hotel & restaurant, in Hertfordshire UK. Luxury leisure breaks, wedding & conference facilities.
Information & advice on savings and investment schemes.
Bush Hall Hotel - traditional quality country house hotel & restaurant, in Hertfordshire UK. Luxury leisure breaks, wedding & conference...
Information & advice on savings and investment schemes.
UMBRIA, Niccone Valley.Farmhouse Rental. Newly renovated 400 year old farmhouse, high on the south facing slope of Niccone Valley, on
AMAZING CORNISH HOUSE previously featured in Vogue Living, available to let during the last 3 weeks of August either on a
PARIS and ROME: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.parisreference.com and www.romanreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Jonny English
April 10th, 2008 9:47amWhy don't they all just bugger off.
Derek Tomnay
April 11th, 2008 9:31amEngland should fear nothing from Scottish independence. The subsidised scots should go their own way. The Conservative party should defend England as there is no advantage in continually maintaining the union. Without Scotland the Conservatives could govern England for ever more.
John F Aberdeen
April 11th, 2008 12:37pmAs a Conservative supporter I agree with most of what Mr Warner has written.
In the last elections I voted SNP in order to defeat the labour MSP and local Lib Dem councillor.
My biggest anger and frustration is at the stupid antics of the Tory party in Scotland. What the hell are they doing aligning themselves with our enemies (labour and Lib-dems) in this independence commission.
Scottish political life has for too long be dominated by a self serving clique and an incompetent, often corrupt clique at that, which includes a backward leaning, uncritical and subserviant media. Wittness people going from media jobs to political jobs and back again,, Labour leaders holidaying with BBC,s Wark.
Brown, Blair and the rest of the Nulab and Lib-dem gangs were happy through the 1980,s to foster anti-english sentiments,, the english were a good cover for the real problems in scotland,, mostly generated by the local incompetent, backward, socialist, freemasonary dominated Scottish clique that have been running the country for decades.
Then Brown, Blair etall let the independance genie out of the bottle and now the English are (understandably) up in arms using the same insults today as scots were (and some still are) using in the 1980,s and 90,s
It would be constructive for those of us in scotland, who hate Socialism and want to destroy it, if the Tory party would come up with sensible policies that address the problems of today.
Firstly they should have nothing to do with the Labour/Dem clique and get out of that commission.
Secondly, propose that the Barnett formula be scrapped. As a believer in conservative principles, I don,t believe in subsidies.
Third, propose that the scottish parliament be allowed to cover its expenditures by raiseing all taxes in scotland,, yes that means all taxes including North Sea Oil (North of the border), whiskey etc.
Fourth, look at separating all other taxes eg, road fund licence, petrol taxes etc even Vat.
Yes lets have competition between the countries, like there is between the North and South of Ireland.
There are arguments about whether or not Scotland can survive on its own through raising its own taxes,, well its time we found out,, take away the pathetic scottish winge of blaming the English, with all revenues and expenditure being controlled in Scotland then that fig leaf has gone.
Fifth, Combine the MP and MSP roles so that MP/MSP,s only attend the UK parliament in a senate. This would leave English MPs to attend to their own business.
I know the above looks like being independant, however, unless the Tory party in scotland opens its brains to new independant thinking based on good tory principles of freedom, self reliance and individual independance from high taxes and petty fogging regulations and public sector jobsworths, instead of linking with the failed Lab/Lib Dem clique then the SNP will continue to enjoy the sight of the scots and english shouting insults and the UK breaking up.
Finally,, I hope Tory supporters (The ones Goldie and the other comfortable Tory MSP,s dont care about) in other constituancies consider following my tactical voting,, especially in seats held by Brown, Darling, Kennedy, in fact all seats held by Labour and the Lib Dems,,, they set out to destroy the UK for their own political purposes,, its up to us Scots who hate scoialism to destroy them.
Frankly I would like to vote conservative in scotland, but cannot see any good reason for doing so.
My biggest desire is to see Mr Cameron elected as PM in place of Brown, surely our worst PM ever and if that means voting SNP in the short term to get 2 parties of socialists out, we can deal with the 3rd socialist party after the Tory victory in England.
Scottish Conservative (Vichy branch)
April 11th, 2008 4:41pmUtter nonsense from start to finish.
Mr. Warner spends most of the first half of this piece berating the Scottish Conservatives for backing devolution - Armageddon turns into the settled will of the Scottish people, that its only the perks the MSPs get that explain the Partys support for it, that the Party got more votes when it opposed it than it does now and that there is a link between this change in position and the falling levels of support.
And then without a hint of irony our sage proclaims that nobody thinks it would be serious politics to call for Holyroods abolition. So why then all the complaints about the Party accepting devolution if u yourself accept it ye big appeaser ye.
We then have my personal favourite "Yet there are innumerable other scenarios the Scottish Tories could have promoted, to the discomfiture of their opponents and the approval of the public." Eh? like what? fewer powers? surely that would induce the same public reaction as abolition. saying it should never have been created whilst still opposing its abolition? come on now!! I would be extremely interested in these innumerable alternatives u tell us r available as i cant think of them.
We r then informed that in pubs and clubs ppl hate the msps. well yes they r particualrly useless n ppl dont like politicians neway. but this doesnt mean they favour the abolition of holyrood. the last 2 polls had 6% and 9% respectively supporting abolition so the Warner Party will be losing deposits across the land by the looks of it.
The confused thinking continues with the ludicrous argument that because Holyrood didnt pass a 50% of the overall electorate hurdle thereby it lacks popular support. Gerald it got 75% approval at the referendum amongst those who turned out. according to your logic there wouldnt be a legitimate government in the western world outside australia. even if not everyone voted virtually noone wants it abolished - apparently not even u. but since u spend most of ur article berating its existence only to say it wouldnt be serious to abolish it i am at a loss as to what u r advocating. what is ur point?
and please spare us these infantile references to vichy and munich - alex salmond is not adolf hitler, scottish independence would not be world war 2 and so these obtuse parallels only serve to further discredit ur already weak argument.
James
April 11th, 2008 10:02pmThis article reads like that from some bitter politics student.
If you seriously think the Scottish people didn't support having their own Parliament then you're utterly deluded and need to grow up.
David McEwan Hill
April 11th, 2008 10:16pmMr Warner has been writing absolute nonsense for a few years now and this offering is no different. He writes to reinforce the idiotic prejudices of a handful of antidiluvian relics and gets paid handsomely for his efforts,but nobody in Scotland pays any attention to him. I hope the English don't make the mistake of doing so.
There is nothing unTory about supporting Scottish Independence (or sturdy self-reliance if you prefer it described like that).
Michael Hill
April 15th, 2008 1:04amThe League of the South supports Scottish Independence. See www.dixienet.org. It's Scotland's right to run her affairs as she sees fit.