Jack Valero, a director of Opus Dei, says that even Dan Brown would be hard-pushed to invent the strange and circuitous business of complaining to the BBC
What was especially annoying was that the BBC pretends to make a particular virtue of being nice to religious minorities. Its editorial guidelines state: ‘We will ensure the religious views and beliefs of an individual, a religion or a religious denomination are not misrepresented.’ So why is Opus Dei exempt?
And would the BBC really treat other religious groups in this way? Can you imagine it broadcasting a drama about the Board of Deputies of British Jews carrying out murder and fraud? The Muslim Council of Britain as money-laundering philanderers? The Salvation Army as a bunch of crooks bent on power? No, of course not.
So we complained. We wanted a little apology, that’s all, and a firm purpose of amendment: a three-second statement read at the graveyard of the news hour, perhaps, a flash of words — ‘Portrayal of Opus Dei unfair. Shall try harder next time’ — that would set the record a little straighter.
After all, a BBC guideline said that ‘the same standards of fairness which apply to factual programmes should generally be observed’, and even promised ‘to be accurate and to ensure that the drama does not unduly distort the known facts and thus become unfair’. Fiction, as every libel lawyer knows, is no defence.
Yet this was precisely the BBC’s defence over the next 18 months, as we laboured up the grievances ladder all the way to Ofcom, through ever more mysterious and circuitous routes. The programme’s producer was keen for us to know, in the first of what would be many informative letters on the Creative Process, that the programme ‘aims to tackle dark, disturbing, but hopefully fascinating subjects using fictional characters against non-fictional backdrops’. Great, we said, but what about portraying Opus Dei members as uniformly evil, and presenting as fact (Opus Dei murders Calvi) what had been disproved over and again? Isn’t the problem that your ‘non-fictional backdrop’ was defamatory and false?
More articles from: Jack Valero | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Theodore Dalrymple examines the evidence against two much-vilified British paediatricians, Professors Southall and Meadow, and finds it sadly lacking
Rod Liddle says that the appointment of an inexperienced, gun-toting formerbeauty queen as his running mate may well be John McCain’s undoing
Ross Clark says that far from keeping our streets safer or cleaner, the government’s new force of amateur policemen are ignoring the worst offenders and pursuing law-abiding innocents instead
Christina Lamb interviews the husband of the late Benazir Bhutto, Asif Ali Zardari, who hopes to be named President of Pakistan this Saturday
Free and open to everyone, the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012 will eclipse the London Games, says Robert Hardman — an unforgettable tribute to the monarch
The taboo on discussing migration has only been partly lifted, says Dennis Sewell. We pretend that all migrants are the same, whereas the statistics reveal some uncomfortable truths
SImon Hoggart on goldfish television
Channel 4 can’t afford Carol Vorderman and says it needs more cash for its public service remit. Nonsense, writes Neil Midgley: it is mass-market television that needs help
The really irrational thing once you have faith is to entertain reasonable doubts
Bonekickers (BBC1); Burn Up (BBC2)
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
james
April 24th, 2008 9:55amInteresting article but not entirely honest.
The mysterious workings of Opus have interested the world for a very long time and it was for that reason that Dan Brown used it in his book.
When I first came to Spain more than thirty years ago it was an open secret that Opus Dei was involved in the government and financial system of Spain and behind most of the many dictatorships in South America.
It is said that the reason why it enjoys such autonomy from local religious authority is because of the financial help it has given to the church.
It is also said to be like a sect where people are brainwashed into contributing all their money,living in a community forcibly seperated from their families. There are in fact Catholic orgnaizations which help people whose family members have been'sequestered' in this way by Opus Dei. The internet abounds with these stories and I have personally heard of one here in Spain.
Some of these stories may be fanciful but anyone who has spent time in Spain knows there is little smoke without fire.
Notting Hill Nonsense
April 24th, 2008 1:21pmI think you give us a good indication of Opus Dei's strange paranoia in your description of its obsessive attempt to get an apology for what was a work of fiction - one that I had never previously heard of.
Dodgy Geezer
April 24th, 2008 1:34pmGiven the BBC decision-making processes so aptly illustrated here:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/08/bbc_blog_bully/
I wonder why you didn't get an immediate reversal of all smears?
Chris
April 24th, 2008 1:41pmHmm. I don't know what 'fact' is - but the BBC do seem exempt from having to provide any level of neutrality or unbiased reporting in both their 'non-fiction' programmes such as the news(!) and 'fictional' programmes such as drama.
Conspiracies abound, i've never read much about Opus Dei, but isn't the reason why the BBC are free to do as they please because they're actually just a mouthpiece for the government propaganda machine? Maybe the problem lies between the government and Opus Dei rather than with the BBC?!!
John Thomas
April 25th, 2008 6:36pmJack - you say the BBC claim to be fair to religious minorities - er, but - remember - not Christian ones (and yes, the Salvation Army would receive bad treatment as well, just like opus Dei). Actually, the documentaries bashing the Salv. Arm. a few years ago encouraged me to support them (well, that may have been Channel 4, but they're both the same). As the government's propoganda mouthpiece, it is a function of the BBC, in our society, to bash Christianity.
Paul Potts
April 25th, 2008 7:00pmOpus Dei constitutes, among other things, a spy network on local clergy, who have to watch their words in case they are reported. No wonder there are so few of them left.
Paulo
M. A. McClavey
April 30th, 2008 12:52amMore and more hearsay, James. And as far as your idea that "It is also said to be like a sect where people are brainwashed into contributing all their money,living in a community forcibly seperated from their families.", seems to me that convents and monasteries did exactly that as well in former times. If the member chooses to join up it's his or her choice seems to me, just like joining a religious order. And it makes sense because it is hard to be a religious person in today's society which is rabidly anti-faith and especially anti-Catholic. Funny thing is, the first person to tell me that Opus Dei interrupted family life was herself a nun. It's all in one's point of view I think.