Daniel Hannan says that the vote on the Lisbon Treaty is not in the bag for the ‘Yes’ camp, which has no argument to offer. Meanwhile, the ‘No’ campaign is gaining ground every day
To be absolutely certain, Euro-enthusiasts also changed the law. Until 2001, Ireland had exemplary rules on the conduct of referendums, providing for every household to receive a mailshot setting out the case for either side. But, following the ‘No’ to Nice, this rule was repealed, allowing the ‘Yes’ side’s massive financial advantage to tell. A consequence of this alteration, of course, is that all Irish referendums — not just those to do with Europe — are now open to bias. Thus does the EU serve to vitiate democracy within its member states.
All in all, Irish ‘ayes’ should be smiling. But, from the moment the campaign began, things went wrong. First, a French minister announced that her government, which currently holds the EU presidency, planned to harmonise business taxes around the EU. ‘Yes’ campaigners were horrified: Ireland’s economic miracle owes a good deal to the fact that its corporation tax is 12.5 per cent, as against 27 per cent in the UK, and far higher in many Continental countries. Ireland’s Europe minister, Dick Roche, called his French colleague’s remarks ‘untimely, unhelpful and inappropriate’. Significantly, he didn’t call them ‘untrue’.
With spectacular clumsiness, the EU decided to shelve the plan until after Ireland had voted — a fact that was then leaked. This was to set the pattern for what followed. Again and again, Euro-integrationists postpone some contentious measure until after the referendum and then — where but in Brussels? — write a memo explaining the need for secrecy. I am looking at one now. It proposes the creation of common policies on justice and home affairs which, however, are not to go live until the ‘Yes’ vote is in the bag.
As the ‘Yes’ side is floundering, the ‘No’ coalition is, for the first time, getting its act together. In the past, it was made up of anti-abortion campaigners, peace activists and Republican hardliners. Now it is also full of articulate youngsters centred around a slick think-tank called Libertas. Meanwhile, Irish farmers, once a reliably pro-EU constituency, are getting tetchy. Last week, with lordly insensitivity, Peter Mandelson told agrarian leaders that they had got their facts wrong. You can imagine how that went down.
More articles from: Dan Hannan | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Rod Liddle says that metropolitan liberal ideology is too deeply ingrained in local councils, social services and the judiciary to be overturned by one panic measure driven by Labour’s sudden fear of the BNP
Cass Sunstein — co-author of the hugely influential Nudge and an adviser to President Obama — unveils his new theory of ‘group polarisation’, and explains why, when like-minded people spend time with each other, their views become not only more confident but more extreme
The acclaimed web theorist, Mark Earls, says that the death of Michael Jackson unleashed the extremes of collective action: mass mourning and sick jokes
In the first of an occasional series of interviews over meals, Deborah Ross talks to Dominic West about The Wire and the challenge to an Old Etonian of playing an American cop
My defining memory of Michael Jackson — vulnerable, brilliant, otherworldly — is of watching him dance to the soundtrack of a movie.
The year ahead is crucial for the European Union.
James Delingpole asks second world war re-enactors what they think of the green agenda: the answer is very different to the consensus around the pine tables of metropolitan London
Daniel Hannan and Douglas Carswell unveil their plan for radical reform to decentralise power, make voting count and challenge apparats from Brussels to town halls
The taboo on discussing migration has only been partly lifted, says Dennis Sewell. We pretend that all migrants are the same, whereas the statistics reveal some uncomfortable truths
Eye-stopping glimpses of an exotic and forbidden world
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Austin Barry
May 22nd, 2008 12:59pmYesterday, the Irish Congress of Trade Unions came out, marginally (its council split 14 to 5 with 8 abstentions including that of the largest union) in favour of the Treaty and is recommending its 600,000 members to vote Yes. Also, for every vote No poster you see around Dublin there are 10 urging Yes. Further, that Sinn Fein, widely regarded as the party of dumb people, is supporting the No vote, is unhelpful. However, the Irish keep a close eye on events in the UK and the arguments made there against the EU resonate to some extent here, although you won't get your average Irishman to admit it. It may be a lot closer than everyone anticipates.
Pete Ward
May 22nd, 2008 1:25pmAustin Barry - really ought to get off his knees and stop grovelling to his English masters. Deeply embarrassing.
Austin Barry
May 22nd, 2008 1:39pmPete, Sinn Fein member?
Terry Darcy
May 22nd, 2008 1:53pmPoor Austin the English really did cut your genitals off. Didn't they.
Austin Barry
May 22nd, 2008 2:00pmChaps, I'm pleased that my rather prosaic post has led to such a lively debate.
VE Bott
May 22nd, 2008 3:15pmIf twice as many Irishmen vote for as against the treaty, I'm sure Mr Hannan will interpret it correctly .... as a sign of dissatisfaction with the Union.
Russ Bowers
May 22nd, 2008 3:33pmPete Ward makes an important (if vulgar) point about Austin Barry and his comments. There do seem to be a lot of people in ex-colonial societies who suffer from inferiority complexes. Mr. Barry would seem to be another desperate example. This is seems to be a lingering and sad legacy of empire. Let's pray that in another generation it will be somehow bred out. I will say an extra prayer for Austin.
Austin Barry
May 22nd, 2008 3:55pmRuss, many thanks for the prayer, better if accompanied by alms, but there you go. You will be distressed to learn that last night Dublin's pubs and streets were packed with the young and old wearing Manchester United colours. I fear that this former colony has a long way to go before your prayers are answered.
Tony Cronin
May 22nd, 2008 4:11pmI thought that Austin was a boys name.
Steven Rossi
May 22nd, 2008 4:17pmAustin Barry should come to England and see how he gets treated. What a W******
William Norton
May 22nd, 2008 4:45pm"...wearing Manchester United colours". What if they were wearing England tops how long would they have lasted alive. Mind you it's nice to know that should I choose to visit the Emerald Isle I shall have a trusty manservant in Mr Barry.
Austin Barry
May 22nd, 2008 5:03pmSteven, I rarely visit England these days as it is quite disagreeable and seems to be declining into some kind of Dystopia which may explain your rather churlish comment. I do though urge you to visit Ireland where there are lower petrol prices, no residential council or water taxes and, of course, much lower rates of corporation tax which is why so many of your English companies are re-locating here. The women are also much prettier than those frightful English girls so well described by Rod Liddle in today's edition.
Perry Larkin
May 22nd, 2008 5:19pmGood God! Does this Barry character know what a complete arse he is making of himself.
Ludo
May 22nd, 2008 5:59pmThis Barry guy writes more like an English toff than an Irishman. He makes some good points and given the vituperative response probably scores some hits. On the topic the referendum, it is meaningless. The EU will charge ahead regardless.
Dafydd
May 23rd, 2008 12:31pmHow cau u be an Irish Nationlist if you vote Yes as you are giving powers to an alien corrupt power crazy institution which we will never chake them off unless by force.
This is not a joke in years down the line our Grandchildren will hate us because they will be living in a police state and un-deomocratic.
Taff
Austin Barry
May 23rd, 2008 7:40pmPerry, oh dear, when Englishmen start to mention arses the world quickly turns its back to the wall.
Mary Roche
May 23rd, 2008 7:48pmI consider myself pro-EU and pro-Euro, but will be voting no for the first time on my 4th EU referendum. The reason: erosion of sovereignty, concerns that the Charter of Fundamental Rights will make the ECJ our real supreme court, the halving of Ireland's QMV vote, Article 48 may mean the end of EU referenda, and concerns about mass-migration from the new member states.
AC
May 24th, 2008 12:12amBrilliant article, I'm voting NO because well for lots of reasons. The UK's parliament voting to retain legal infanticide (abortion at 24 weeks) is another recent one I've added to an already very long list. Put simply I don't want any foreigners making laws that will affect the sovereignty and freedom of my country.
Andrew Morrow
May 24th, 2008 12:32amLike Mary I was always very pro-Europe and speak French, German and Spanish. I have also worked in Germany before returning to Ireland. However I totally agree with her view and will also be voting No this time round. Our friends in France are delighted that we will be able to vote seeing as Sarko has deprived them of their democratic rights.
Chris
May 24th, 2008 2:07amIf Sinn Feing are opposed to the Libn Treaty, and Sinn Fein are the political wing of the IRA, I was wondering if Daniel could tell us if the EU has conssidered the possibility of an IRA terrorist campaign being conducted against it's authority by Irish Republicans and sympathisers? Seriously Daniel, has the powers that be in the EU hieracrhy not realised that there is truth in the saying that if you ignore the mistakes made in history, then you are doomed to repeat them?
Austin Barry
May 24th, 2008 2:05pmChris, what's left of the provisional IRA is a band of embittered (they lost the war) oldsters more interested in mafia-style criminality to fund their holiday homes in Donegal and Spain or to upgrade their hideous pseudo-mansions in South Armagh than to take arms against a sea of Directives.
Kathleen Scott
May 26th, 2008 6:31pmI am Irish; a political Republican in the original sense of that word and unable to comprehend the 'playground' abuse of Austin Barry.
I am anti-Sinn Fein and previously pro-Europe BUT I am voting NO for precisely the reasons listed by Mary - erosion of sovereignty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the quota, and Article 48.
Mass migration in the face of a turn-down in the Irish economy SHOULD be of major concern to all voters. The hard-working Poles are leaving because there is no work yet, we have significant numbers of Romanians aggressively begging, on the streets and from door to door in residential areas.
The reality is, immigrants make sense to the general populace ONLY when there is plenty of work and surplus money in the system. Unemployed immigrants are a recipe for civil unrest.
antony douglas
May 26th, 2008 8:10pmStop this right now,you lot sound like a "Punch"cartoon faction fight come to life,the serious issue is can EU be bounced into showing it's hand in time to influence public opinion ?.
Bolg
May 28th, 2008 11:15amA few points of correction/different opinion perhaps:
(a) The Irish Constitution does not necessarily "require" a referendum for all Treaties - one court's interpretation of the Constitution says that we must. There is a strong argument, recently made in the Irish Times, that a referendum is not necessary for Lisbon, but is being held for political reasons.
(b) Does "gombeenism" even roughly translate as sleaze? I have always understood it to mean incompetence or representative of the negative stereotype of Irish idiocy. A gombeen is a stupid person or buffon. I could be wrong about this, and I see in Google searches that some people say it means a loan shark (a definition I've never heard). But I've never heard it used in the sleaze context (can't find the UK court decision in Reynolds v. Sunday Times that discusses it, the HoL doesn't).
(c) Was the rule that State funds can't be used to support one side of a referendum repealed? Wasn't that requirement due to a constitutional case, in which case a referendum is necessary? I don't remember this change you mention. The Referendum Commission is impartial and the political parties do their own bit. I think it is ridiculous, mind you, that we used to get these Referendum Commission leaflets saying "on the one hand" and "on the other", rather than just providing the information.
I could be wrong in relation to some of these points, but I would be interested in clarification.
BTW, I love your "Pro-Treaty Forces" reference, and am surprised that no one has drawn any analogies (even jokingly) between Lisbon and previous Irish treaty controversies. Perhaps we just instinctively divide down the middle on Treaties negotiated with external peoples?
Elfed Vaughan Roberts
June 5th, 2008 9:02amI cannot see why commentators on the upcoming referendum in Ireland cannot predict the eventual outcome.
If the return, let us say, is 51% in favour and 49% against the treaty then the people will have spoken and the treaty will come into force and no further referendums will be necessary.
If, however, the outcome is say 51% against and 49% in favour then the powers in the European Union will offer a few goodies to Ireland and insist on another referendum and another and then another until the vote is positive.
Then the peoplewill have decided to endorse the treaty and no further referedums will be necessary. Quod erat demonstandum.
Hans Henrik Hansen
June 6th, 2008 1:19pmAppeal from abroad:
A Danish referendum was scheduled as part of 'the Nice Treaty' ratification process, but was suspended after the French and the Dutch NO-votes! There are strong indications that the Danish outcome would have been a NO, as well. In order to circumvent this 'calamity' the Danish government ruled that the Lisbon Treaty does not infringe upon Danish sovereignty - in spite of the fact that the substance of the two documents ('Nice' <-> 'Lisbon') are identical. This undemocratic - and most likely unconstitutional - act has frustrated and infuriated many Danes. Among Europeans the Danes are far from alone in their dismay with this 'new order' which will further undermine the authority of our democratically elected parliaments and transfer it to the faceless and closed EU bureaucracy.
In consequence of this deplorable situation we fellow-Europeans are now turning to the Irish voters, encouraging them to send a resounding 'NO' to Brussels next Thursday!
I recommend reading this article with specific focus on Ireland, written by the Danish MEP, Jens Peter Bonde:
http://www.bonde.com/index.php/bonde_uk/article/C221/
Since 1979 he has represented Denmark in the European Parliament, and he has acquired an admirable insight into all EU perspectives.
PS Apologies for my primitive English: I'm 'only' a Dane! :)
Sam
June 6th, 2008 1:21pmGreat article. One fault - Dan Hannan's forecast of the decision. It WILL be "No!"
Eats Wombats
June 8th, 2008 11:55pmThis was a good article. There's some good knockabout debate on the issue over on www.order-order.com, with some fine rhetoric from "Phoenix Park".
One or two points need stating here: first, there's considerable British begrudgery over Ireland's prosperity and fairly constant suggestions that it is entirely down to EU handounts. This is simply not the case. Ireland has far outperformed Portugal, Greece and others who also received EU funds. The facts and the analyses are readily available, here e.g., http://workforall.net/EN_Tax_policy_for_growth_and_jobs.html, ; there are many others.
Similiarly, there are regular British sneers over Ireland's rejection of the Nice treaty first time around and its subsequent acceptance, as if this was something to be ashamed of. On the contrary. First, referenda are not at all unusual in Ireland and there have been repeated referenda on some issues (e.g. on divorce), at intervals, reflecting changing attitudes and demography. The idea of Ireland's bottom being spanked and it being told to get the right answer is patronising nonsense. The reverse is true. The Irish people required and obtained assurances on important matters of principle and they had a greater say in those than the British people have ever had.
Ireland needs no lessons in democracy from the UK.
Meanwhile, the quality of life gap between Ireland and the UK widens annually--check The Economist's annual survey.