Damian Thompson on the bitter feud between the new young defenders of the recently reinstated Latin Mass, and Britain’s ‘magic circle’ of liberal bishops
While Church of England bishops recoil from the prospect of gay ‘weddings’ with no precedent in Christian history, their Catholic counterparts are wringing their hands at the growing popularity of services that are too traditional for their tastes.
On Saturday 14 June Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, one of the most senior figures in the Roman Curia and an ally of the Holy Father, celebrated a Pontifical High Mass at Westminster Cathedral. The bishop of the diocese, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, did not attend; nor did any of his four auxiliary bishops. Pope Benedict is rumoured to be furious at this display of bad manners.
What can explain such a breach of protocol? The answer lies in the content and style of the liturgy being celebrated. Cardinal Castrillón processed into the cathedral wearing the cappa magna, a scarlet cape with a 20ft train of watered silk. It is many years since this vestment has been seen in the cathedral — for, although it was never abolished, it is associated with the Tridentine Mass, the ancient Latin rite in which the celebrant faces east, reciting its main prayer in a voice so low that the church falls silent. And that was the Mass that His Eminence celebrated on 14 June, becoming the first cardinal to do so in Westminster Cathedral for 40 years.
Last summer — to the horror of the liberal English bishops — Pope Benedict issued an apostolic letter, Summorum Pontificum, that granted universal permission for the old Mass, which had been effectively banned from normal parish life after the Second Vatican Council. England’s Latin Mass Society seized its chance. It invited Cardinal Castrillón, head of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, which is responsible for the old liturgy worldwide, to celebrate the society’s annual traditional Mass at Westminster Cathedral, normally a low-key affair regarded with amused condescension by diocesan liberals.
More articles from: Damian Thompson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Rod Liddle says that metropolitan liberal ideology is too deeply ingrained in local councils, social services and the judiciary to be overturned by one panic measure driven by Labour’s sudden fear of the BNP
Cass Sunstein — co-author of the hugely influential Nudge and an adviser to President Obama — unveils his new theory of ‘group polarisation’, and explains why, when like-minded people spend time with each other, their views become not only more confident but more extreme
The acclaimed web theorist, Mark Earls, says that the death of Michael Jackson unleashed the extremes of collective action: mass mourning and sick jokes
In the first of an occasional series of interviews over meals, Deborah Ross talks to Dominic West about The Wire and the challenge to an Old Etonian of playing an American cop
My defining memory of Michael Jackson — vulnerable, brilliant, otherworldly — is of watching him dance to the soundtrack of a movie.
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, 2001-2004, edited by Lawrence Goldman
Simon Caldwell says that the wartime Pope was no Nazi sympathiser: on the contrary, he was a thorn in Hitler’s side and a protector of persecuted Jews
Tom Leonard makes a pilgrimage to Cornish, New Hampshire, where the 90-year-old author of The Catcher in the Rye leads a reclusive existence with his third wife
Vicky Cristina Barcelona
12A, Nationwide
Rod Liddle says that television news is intrinsically biased: it transforms what it reports.
In the case of the economy, ministers are right to counteract this with a dose of optimism
IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel
BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Alan Johnson
June 19th, 2008 8:51amA tad dramatic, perhaps? Still, the smells and bells brigade are inclined to be "colourful" and more interested in outer displays than inner charity. Some people love nothing more than a jolly good show.
They tend to be the kind of traditionalists who demand uniformity in organisations, just so long as it is uniformity with their ideas.
Alan
Anna
June 19th, 2008 11:32amHow hard it is to satisfy all people! I am not a Roman Catholic, but have been interested in your writings on this and my take is diametrically opposed to that of commenter Alan Johnson.
It seems to me to demonstrate a modern pattern: a "liberal" elite denying choice to those whom they consider to be their ignorant inferiors.
Eric Hester
June 19th, 2008 12:23pmThis is an important article and it is no exaggeration to talk about Civil War. On another aspect, one Bishop, the Bishop of Lancaster, produced a brilliant document, aimed at putting right so much that is wrong with Catholic Schools. This document has been endorsed by three Vatican Congregations, something unprecedented, but you will not find it even mentioned on the website of the Catholic Education Service, the official body of the national Bishops' Conference and the Chairman of that body, the Archbishop of Birmingham, Vincent Niohols, refuses to do anything about it.
Frank
June 19th, 2008 1:00pmAs a Church of England athiest, I do hope so.
Stephen Patten
June 19th, 2008 5:48pmAlan, most of those described as 'traditionalists' (that I know) tend to be primarily concerned with the salvation of their soul and, because the two are inextricably connected, the souls of others. Surely this is the greatest form of charity?
Kevin
June 19th, 2008 8:59pmWhy does Cardinal Hoyos fear "creating" division? What is the mark of unity?
Paul Waller
June 20th, 2008 12:50amOoooh! Scratch your eyes out.
Nicolas Ollivant
June 20th, 2008 11:15amThese bishops are, of course, not "liberal" in any normally accepted sense of the word. They are intolerant of diversity and fearful of change. They use every means to coerce priests under their jurisdiction into a banal conformity to their own practices. If they were indeed liberal they would welcome the fact that the faithful are being offered a greater choice in the from of worship. These bishops should reflect on what the word prejudice means and ask themselves why the so-called traditioanlist Masses are so well attended.
Martin Ward
June 20th, 2008 11:30am"the new young defenders of the recently reinstated Latin Mass" - are usually gay and often converts. The whole thing is turning into a bloody circus.
Deeply Lapsed Catholic
June 20th, 2008 1:42pmWho cares? Why bother with any of these people? The whole lot of them form a great reason to go off on one's own way.
Clare Coffey
June 20th, 2008 4:07pmCongratulations to Damian for championing the Tridentine Rite in Britain.
Would like to point out that not all the young people who like to attend the Tridentine Rite are gay. I like attending this rite of Mass and I am not gay.
Damian now must turn his attention to what is being taught in Catholic schools. I am under 40 and I was told in the 6th Form by a Catholic teacher that there is no such things as angels and that hell is here on earth.
Steven Jonson
June 20th, 2008 5:49pmWhatever anyone says it is all very GAY.
laurie macdonell-sanchez
June 20th, 2008 5:56pmLeftism, NOT liberalism, has been allowed to flourish in a Church that has always been a prime target of the Left, ever since the Bolshies began their blood-letting & political adventurism. Why? Communism never had a greater enemy than the Catholic Church. Solution? Infiltrate & undermine. One especially fertile result was the superficially noble but basically wrong-headed Vatican II & its aftermath of tens of millions of disaffected Roman Catholics on several continents; the "pedophile" debacle in the US (a misnomer--the great majority of offending clergy are gays w/weak vocations & their victims pre- or pubescent boys [although there are gay priests w/strong vocations & self control]); the severe decline in the quality & availability of Catholic school education (MANY non-Catholics benefited from it w/o being required to sit in on the religious education); the denial of public funding for nonprofit Catholic hospitals and other social welfare institutions. What a nasty bumper crop (but precisely the one the Left worked so hard & for so long to produce) the "brave new" RC-PC crowd has provided to not just Catholics, but society at large anywhere in the "civilized" world, & especially in countries in the throes of every kind of turmoil.
Omadhaun
June 20th, 2008 11:28pmWhat a lot of noise about NOTHING! I grew up in the Latin Rite- could read some Latin- and- in any event- had a missal to translate on the spot.For all practical purposes NOONE in the Church could understand the biblical readings in Latin.IN fact, it was quite acceptable for the people who were unable to deal with LAtin to kneel in the pew "telling" their rosary beads. When Vatican II cam on the scene- the Latin was essentially thrown out and the faithful were introduced to the Bible in good English. No more mumbling by the cleric with his back to the congregation. Now- this use of English - or French or whatever was your preference- did not guarantee that the sermon would be either coherent or inspiring not did it guarantee that the liturgical music would elevate ones soul.
The attraction of many young people to the Latin mass is founded upon a misplaced belief that the Latin Mass was somehow holier because it was old [actually only 16th century]. This is ludicrous. Encouraging a return to that obscurantism is sheer folly. Latin did NOT communicate the sacred- in fact- it probably hindered the understanding of the sacred by the congregation. Inasmuch as there are not 50 people in the world who actually can communicate in Latin- one can hope that this silliness will disappear in the near future.
Oscar LeWilde
June 21st, 2008 1:20amI am delighted to know that, whist my struggle to affirm, through a civil partnership ceremony in Westminster Cathedral, my relationship with my pet gerbil, it may yet occur some day, and delightfully,in the most brightly coloured garments.
Kevin
June 21st, 2008 11:03amPax tecum, Omadhaune.
"whatever was your preference" is not the mark of unity that I was hoping for.
But tell me, does anyone "communicate" in ICEL English? Who says, "Peace be with you", in the street? Who says, "And also with you"?
What would be left in the world if everything had to be done in the language and posture of everyday communication? No Shakespeare plays, no poetry, no written English. Just more slang, and everyone sitting down in casual dress (probably pyjamas and slippers).
Profane night-club goers are more demanding in their ritual than the "sacred" Novus Ordo. (I use the Latin here because “New Order” would mean something different to night-club goers.)
Kevin
June 21st, 2008 11:28amP.S., Omadhaun,
You say that the Latin Mass is "only 16th century". Here is a painting of a Mass in the National Gallery (I am not responsible for the link, etc.):
http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=NG253
The painting has been dated to the late fifteenth century. It bears a remarkable resemblance to the "Tridentine" Rite, and yet it pre-dates the Council of Trent.
So when was the "16th century" Latin Mass introduced?
John Bishop
June 21st, 2008 11:48amDeo gratias for the restoration of the 'Mass for all time.'The disaster which has overtaken the Church over the last forty years can be laid firmly at the door of the ill
conceived and protestantised'novus ordo missae.'We can now look forward to the great spiritual benefits of the true Mass for which, over the centuries,saints were martyred and by which so many of all faiths and none were converted.At last a re-statement of the eternal truths concerning the body and blood soul and divinity of Christ in this perilous age of atheism and relativism.The real Mass will save us.
conceived 'novus ordo misse.'Constructed to protestantise the Church it ahs been a monumental falure.
Barry Eastern
June 21st, 2008 12:56pmMind your bums.
Bob Smith
June 22nd, 2008 10:46pmFor those interested more information on the whole question of Traditional Catholicism and the Latin Mass is available online at:
http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/newmass/index.htm
ariadne
June 25th, 2008 8:29pm"the new young defenders of the recently reinstated Latin Mass" - are usually gay and often converts. The whole thing is turning into a bloody circus."
Sir, you are a twit.
Neil Stacey
June 26th, 2008 12:06amHow do I just know that ariadne is a man. Case closed .
dennis hayes
June 26th, 2008 1:28amthe pope. what a guy, eh?
Wolfgang Somary
June 26th, 2008 9:14pmAnglicans have King James, Orthodox Russians old Slavonic, Greek Orthodox Hellenistic Greek, Jews have Hebrew, Muslims classical Arabic, Hindus Sanskrit and Buddhists Pali. Only Roman Catholics have ecclesiastical commissions that dumb down the language every ten years. Mass is poetry, not journalism.
Lottie, Divinity student.
June 30th, 2008 12:25amI have a number of thoughts on this article, it was somewhat tought provoking! firstly the fact that there is indeed a dispute of this calibre going on in the church was concerning - i am more inclined to propose that both the Old and new rite masses be available to the faithfull since the body of Christ is made up of many members (each with different tastes, etc)
Am i succombing to the trademark 'relativism' of post-modern thought in proposing this attitude, no, i believe both rites to be equally valid (having both been approved by the Magisterum of the church) and to be of incredible depth theologically for differnt reasons. to give you an example the Tridentine mass maintains the sense of the numinous and transcentdent qualities of God whereas the new rite allows one to both be sat at the last supper, be stood at the foot of the cross and be in heaven all at the same time- thus emphasizing the omnipresent and eternal nature of God and man's participation in the trinitarian life of God- there are many many more riches that i could also describe but in this limited account of which i shall spare you!
The Holy Father is doing alot of good in the church, i am thankfull that i as both a Divinity student and Catholic have the opportunity to indulge in both rites. I do not believe that 'anything goes' for traditionl Catholic values should be upheld at all times- but in this instance i would be inclined to draw the line at a compromise providing the sacraments and church doctrine is honoured and preserved.
Spectre
June 30th, 2008 5:12pmFunny, I'm a regular attendee at Westminster Cathedral and an occasional attendee at the TLM. To call Westminster Cathedral's usual liturgy "watered down" indicates one of three things: either the author is ignorant, or he is deliberately misrepresenting the truth, or he is barking mad.
As for these rumours of Pope Benedict being cross, indeed, this isn't the first time I have seen this talked about. It's just invariably Damian Thompson doing the talking (he hates rumour mongering don't you know, but he just has to share this and that little tidbit).
Civil war, well, if a tiny but incredibly noisy faction of the traditionalist wing versus everyone else counts as a war, perhaps.
On the military analogy: the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster and primate of England in his own cathedral is hardly an inferior officer to a curial cardinal.
Anna: "I am not a Roman Catholic"... so why should your opinions be of the slightest interest to those of us who are?
John Wilson
July 2nd, 2008 12:07pmReadable stuff but please be careful not to imply that those who are sceptical and worried about the Tridentine Mass necessarily have any sympathy with they quite awful folk Masses with guitars, tambourines and texts which make one cringe. These accretions are not part of the essence of the reformed Pauline Mass. As the principal liturgy at Westminster Cathedral on any Sunday shows, beauty, a sense of awe and music making of the highest quality are perfectly compatible with the post-Vatican II liturgy. It is certainly not because of plainchant or vestments that I, and many, many other Catholics find the return to the Tridentine Mass problematic and worrying.