Saturday 22 November 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


Very discreetly, Cameron is writing his first Queen’s Speech

Wednesday, 25th June 2008

In spite of their commanding poll lead, the Tories are terrified of seeming complacent. But, as Fraser Nelson discloses, work is well advanced on a first-term plan for government in which education reform and a welfare revolution will be the centrepieces

Another lesson that Mr Cameron has learned from Mr Blair is that his government, in ways predictable and unpredictable, is likely to be overshadowed by foreign policy, as Mr Blair’s second term was. One shadow Cabinet member — echoing Clarissa Eden’s famous remark about the Suez Canal — has warned him that Afghanistan will ‘flow through 10 Downing Street like a river’. So, too, may Iran also test the resolve of a new American president, risking a fresh conflagration which would — at the very least — absorb the time and test the moral fibre of Prime Minister Cameron.

Then, Europe. Already some senior shadow Cabinet members are expressing hopes that the Lisbon Treaty argument will remain open long enough for a Conservative government to be elected and renegotiate Britain’s entire membership. Mr Cameron’s wish is for Europe just to go away — but it will not be granted. His first Education Act, for example, will be sent straight to Strasbourg as the manifesto pledge to scrap independent tribunals for school expulsions clearly contradicts the right to a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The argument has started already. Eurosceptics argue that if Mr Cameron is to govern freely, he must engage with the European question. Yet I am told the Implementation Unit is working to discourage any such confrontation. ‘The ex-civil servants are already saying, “You can take on the EU, but realise it will dominate your first year,”’ complains one party aide.

This is the problem foreshadowed by Mr Cameron’s preparations — few of his team relish the prospect of advice from civil servants, retired or otherwise. ‘Maude’s team haven’t been near me yet. They’re not brave enough,’ one senior shadow Cabinet member told me. Mr Maude argues that the mandarins are not intrinsically bad news, and just need clear direction which a Cameron government will provide. It is a noticeable contrast from Blairites like Alan Milburn who argue that the only way of wresting power from the government is to cut Whitehall’s head count by a quarter.

More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Eric Hester

June 26th, 2008 9:17am

The Conservatives risk making a mistake with education and yet it is the easiest one to get right. There is nothing wrong per se in the idea of allowing the setting up of more schools but it will take years before it has any real effect. Let us start with sile facts: Britain has some of the best schools in the world, the independent schools, and some of the worst, the state schools. So why not turn all the state schools into independent schools? It is easy. All the new Education Secretary has to say is that from tomorrow all the rules and regulations currently imposed on schools will still exists but will be only voluntary not compulsory. Schools can make decisions on the basis of whether they are best for educating their pupils (which is what indpendent schools do) rather than pleasing politicians, which is what state schools do. Then - and MOST important - the Education Secretay says that admissions will also be freed. Schools will decide their own admissions, as independent schools do, and parents will be able to apply to any school that they think will give their children a good education, which is what independent school parents do. The state will pay the school fees up to a limit that is decided. This is the magic wand that will transform education for all children overnight. More than that, there is another bonus for the Conservatives. Far from costing more, this will cost less since schools run as independent schools will not need thousands of non-playing bureaucrats; the independent schools do quite well without them.

Dave B

June 26th, 2008 9:19am

"His first Education Act, for example, will be sent straight to Strasbourg as the manifesto pledge to scrap independent tribunals for school expulsions clearly contradicts the right to a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights."

Are you sure about that? I find it hard to believe anyone is going to try to apply the ECHR to school discipline.

Dave B

June 26th, 2008 9:20am

"His first Education Act, for example, will be sent straight to Strasbourg as the manifesto pledge to scrap independent tribunals for school expulsions clearly contradicts the right to a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights."

Are you sure about that? I find it hard to believe anyone is going to try to apply the ECHR to school discipline.

Philip Porter

June 26th, 2008 1:07pm

"Then, Europe. Already some senior shadow Cabinet members are expressing hopes that the Lisbon Treaty argument will remain open long enough for a Conservative government to be elected and renegotiate Britain’s entire membership. Mr Cameron’s wish is for Europe just to go away — but it will not be granted. His first Education Act, for example, will be sent straight to Strasbourg as the manifesto pledge to scrap independent tribunals for school expulsions clearly contradicts the right to a fair trial enshrined in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights."

--> Strasbourg ???

The ECHR in Strasbourg is nothing to do with the EU ! The Strasbourg court is an institution of the Council of Europe (which includes Russia and many other non-EU countries).

The EU's court is the European Court of Justice - which is Luxembourg.

I do not want to be rude but, quite honestly, one would expect the Spectator's political correspondent to know better ...

When it comes to Europe, I am not sure you really know what you are talking about.

T Reason

June 26th, 2008 1:25pm

You really don't get David Davis do you?

Hysteria

June 26th, 2008 4:29pm

"It would take at least a year to draw up the contracts, and six months to award them"

Perhaps - but no need to delay kicking off the contract preparation - that can start at any time - with the bid package ready to go out the door on D+1

David Lindsay

June 26th, 2008 4:35pm

Pure wishful thinking.

How long has the right-wing press been banging on about Eurosceptical, or tough on crime, or committed to traditional family values, the Tories are really?

For that, as for this, there exists absolutely no evidence whatever, but rather, overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Fraser Nelson

June 26th, 2008 5:45pm

Philip, where do you think I am confused? The issue of "Europe" contains both EU membership and ECHR. And I am fully aware of which courts do what, where. Dave B, ECHR has been used to release Abu Qatada. Of course it will be used by parents whose kids were expelled without an independent tribunal.

TomTom

June 27th, 2008 7:04am

"The aim is to launch a new breed of boutique state schools competing for pupils"

Disaster - this is why universities are being debased.

Pupils must compete for places. It is pupils who must perform and stop being quite so lethargic and demotivated - it is individual effort not glossy marketing brochures from universities.

We do not want the Us route of investing in sports facilities and grade inflation to woo bums on seats to cover costs

CCTV

June 27th, 2008 7:06am

"Of course it will be used by parents whose kids were expelled without an independent tribunal."

Is that why the Tories introduced the appeals procedure ?

It is not even the ECHR - English Judges could use Common Law to create exactly the same situation

Water

June 27th, 2008 9:54am

I'm glad that he's not getting complacent.

Tapestry

June 27th, 2008 11:02am

Who cares which european body is the source of power in Britain. The point is that power must be returned to parliament. The question is - how will Cameron tackle the issue.

I've made my suggestions today on www.the-tap.blogspot.com, titled 'How Will Britain Leave The EU?'

Agincourt

June 27th, 2008 12:31pm

Personally, I do not believe that schools & welfare are the absolute No.1 priority at present. Certainly they need to be dealt with both effectively & soon, but the real issue is - Britain regaining its confidence in itself!

Consequently, I believe that a new Tory government should let the British people be proud of Britain again - something that is certainly not possible under Brown's disorderly rabble!

To improve national self-confidence, Cameron, or whoever the Tories' new PM is, should take the following two approaches:

1. Legislate that everything major to do with the EU should be endorsed by referendums - especially when, like Ireland's constitution requires, whenever any new powers are transferred to Brussels. The new Tory government should also call an early consultative referendum on the EU in which the new Tory government would ask the electorate what kind of approach they want the government to follow towards the EU. Ie one which asks questions to identify which of the following 3 approaches the British people want:
A). a closely integrationalist approach to the EU (though in practice I suspect that would not get many votes),
B). a free trade approach which clearly avoids most political integration, or
C). withdrawal to the political "edge-of-Europe" EEA (European Economic Association), whose main members are Norway & Iceland (& which also has a special relationship with Switzerland).

Following this consultative referendum, the new Tory government would declare that it would base its future approaches towards the EU on the voting spread between these 3 choices etc. I believe that the new Tory PM should also offer repeats of this poll every, eg, 10 years - or alternatively within every 3 Parliaments' lifetimes etc.

The advantage of this approach would be that it would clearly have democratic legitimacy, which was so clearly absent in the recent, wholy disgraceful, Lisbon Treaty process. It would also call the Lib-Dems' EU-related bluff, bearing in mind their unethical Parliamentary behaviour during the recent Lisbon Treaty votes in both the Commons & the Lords.

2. The new Tory government will also need to make up for Labour's appalling neglect of our Armed Forces, especially the inadequate equipment supplied to our soldiers & airmen currently serving in Iraq & Afghanistan. Although MRAP (ie mine resistant & ambush protected) vehicles are now at last appearing in Iraq in sufficient quantity & quality, there are still far too few of them in Afghanistan where the fighting is now very hard indeed. There is also a huge need there for many more helicopters that are capable of meeting Afghanistan's very challenging "hot-&-high" conditions, as well as sufficient numbers of armed UAVS (unmanned aerial vehicles) & other relevant reconnaisance aircraft & assets etc. And of course, more people on the ground, which means, despite the expense, more troops generally. Britain currently has slightly under 100,000 ground troops, which is obviously not nearly enough for our normal requirements, let alone when these now include counter-insurgency work in Iraq & Afganistan - & wherever next, who knows?

If a new Tory government can work in this way to help people feel proud of their once-&-still-to-be-great country, public support will be both plentiful & long-term! Britain needs a bit of patriotism again, & if the Tories follow policies like these, the people will gladly back them - again, & again, & again! Absolutely certainly they will!

Kiffa

June 27th, 2008 12:49pm

Eric Hester, if it were that easy the government - any government - would do it, surely. How would the teacher's unions and the LEAs react to your proposals? After all, why did Tony Blair go to such exensive lengths to create new schools (academies) behind the backs of the LEAs?
As a school governor, I can assure you you are right: nothing strangles state schools more than centralised political control, and nothing is needed more than the independence of the head and governors from the LEAs - especially in admissions. Nothing! I will vote for ANY politician who has the courage to take them on.

Verity

June 27th, 2008 2:03pm

Dave B "I find it hard to believe anyone is going to try to apply the ECHR to school discipline."

I find it hard to believe that anyone would apply the ECHR to foreign convicted terrorists, rapists and murderers. But they do, as a matter of course and a punch in the face to the British who own this country.

Fraser says Cameron is "very discreetly" writing his firs Queen's speech."

How would he do it indiscreetly? Set up a desk in Piccadilly Circus?

Chingford Man

June 27th, 2008 2:14pm

Good picture of Windmill Dave on the front cover. Someone please tell the Emperor that he has no clothes.

kipper

June 27th, 2008 3:26pm

Rats with wings, should be painted red.

colin

June 28th, 2008 9:41pm

David MUST make a BIG deal out of dumping multiculturalism in favour of integration...The voters will MOB him with love!

Ray

June 30th, 2008 9:43am

Prime Minister Cameron must face down the EU steamroller and within weeks of taking office declare that UK law will henceforth take precedence over Brussels law - irrespective of how many feathers it ruffles.

Otherwise, the EU will end up emasculating and destroying his government as surely as it did those of his two Conservative predecessors.

W H Thomas

July 1st, 2008 11:16am

What I am looking for - apparently without any real hope - is a list of the repressive and/or offensive bits of Labour legislation which are to be repealed within the first week of the new Conservative Government. ID cards; HIPs; the Hunting Act; IHT; Stamp Duty under £½ million; excessive airport security; unnecessary "health and safety" rules; CRB checks other than on teachers.... to name but a few. Come on Mr Cameron, give us your word.


The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
The Spectator Billabong

In this section

Thank goodness we can have a run on the pound when we need one

Martin Vander Weyer

Martin Vander Weyer looks ahead to next week’s Pre-Budget Report and reflects on George Osborne’s contentious remarks about the devaluation of sterling. It looks like Gordon Brown is getting away with his borrowing binge — leaving the Tories isolated

I loved Oliver Stone’s Bush film — and I know why the critics hated it

Rod Liddle

The movie W. did not provide the crude anti-Bush agitprop that the reviewers craved, says Rod Liddle. This was precisely its strength: we need to get inside the minds even of those we most deplore

The great Tory tax and spend battle: seconds out...

Fraser Nelson and Daniel Finkelstein

In the wake of Cameron’s decision to drop his pledge to match Labour spending, Fraser Nelson and Daniel Fin kelstein of the Times trade rhetorical blows over the issue that is gripping and troubling the Conservative party as it adjusts to the transformed economic context

Where is our inspiration when we most need it?

Bryan Forbes

Bryan Forbes remembers listening to Churchill as a 14-year-old evacuee and now looks with envy at Obama’s capacity to galvanise hope. Where are his UK counterparts?

For a bit of perspective, try thinking Jurassic

Christopher Lloyd

The first takeaways originated about 150 million years ago, says Christopher Lloyd; global travel is pretty ancient, too. And as for democracy...

Related articles

The Republicans are where the Tories were in 1997

James Forsyth

This is bad news for the Conservatives, who have always feasted on US right-of-centre ideas, says James Forsyth. But the GOP can learn from the Cameroons

Want to cut taxes? First cut spending. Here’s how

Fraser Nelson

After a week of clamorous competition between the parties over tax cuts, Fraser Nelson offers a guide to paying for them: a programme of spending cuts that would preserve core services but shave off the fat of the Brown years. All that is needed is political will

Osborne stumbles: but is there a bigger story about Mandelson?

Melissa Kite

Melissa Kite says that the shadow chancellor should have known better than to cross the most brutal spin-doctor in Westminster, or flout the conventions of the super-rich. But we should not be distracted from the Business Secretary’s true role in this saga

Amid the financial turmoil, Peter versus George is the key battle

Fraser Nelson

Stand by for a mighty clash between two politicians, says Fraser Nelson. The now infamous dinner between Mandelson and Osborne was a cordial parting for power-brokers of different generations who will fight each other savagely for electoral advantage

This charming man: an audience with the Gover

Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson meets the shadow schools secretary and finds him bracingly radical and disarmingly polite: a recipe for success in government

Spectator recommends

Free Sky Digital Offer - Order Now

Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other