RSS

Contact us

Saturday 4 July 2009

The Spectator's Notes

Charles Moore's reflections on the week

The opinions of the Sun newspaper are not noted for nuance, so it has been interesting to follow its unusually careful choice of words about the Olympic torch on its way to China. On Monday, under the headline ‘Freedom Wins’, the leading article called the fact that the torch managed, though with difficulty, to continue its relay through London ‘a triumph for democracy’. It claimed that the British government was speaking out for human rights in China and Tibet, and ran a line presumably planted by the government about how Mr Brown would meet the Dalai Lama next month. It declared that the torch stands for ‘peace, friendship and unity’. It did not comment on the weird, violent Chinese guardians of the flame — actually the People’s Armed Police — who surrounded it. The next day, after the torch had been put out three or four times (accounts differ) in Paris and was then hurried away in a bus, the Sun said that each country through which the flame passes ‘owes a duty to the Olympic legacy to keep it burning. The French should have guarded it properly or had nothing to do with it at all.’ On its website, the Sun has an Olympic torch flickering on its masthead. What will it say if another country does as it rhetorically suggests, and decides to opt out of the relay? I don’t think it will applaud. What will it say if the relay is forced to stop altogether? Will its own torch gutter? In the old days, the Times was always the establishment paper which put forward the view of the prevailing elites (pro-appeasement in the 1930s, for example). Rupert Murdoch, who has a Chinese wife and many interests in her country, owns both the Sun and the Times, but now prefers the former as the establishment voice. The Sun’s support for the torch has very little to do with the views of its readers, or even with the Olympics, and a great deal to do with Mr Murdoch’s possibly correct political and commercial calculation that China will fairly soon rule the world and so should be appeased. Tibet, to pursue the pre-war analogy, is an even further-away country than Czechoslovakia. The Olympic Games took place in Berlin in 1936 and war began three years later. Will the West be ready to do anything if China invades Taiwan in 2011?

More articles from: Charles Moore | this section

Print this article  |  Email to a friend  |  Permalink   |   Comment

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Advertisement

Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine

Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms

Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP

All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved