Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

Letters

Wednesday, 10th September 2008

Spectator readers respond to recent articles

Taking care of Toby

Sir: Kirsten Dunst never insisted that I ban Toby Young (Status anxiety, 6 September) from the set of How To Lose Friends & Alienate People. Toby’s piece stemmed from a recent article of mine in Empire magazine. In his opening paragraph, he says he learned from it that ‘the reason I was banned from the set of the film is because Kirsten Dunst insisted on it’. But Toby didn’t read my article before he wrote his.

For the record, Kirsten told me on set that Toby had given her a performance note. (Toby says she overheard him give a note about her performance to a third party. The difference is negligible and entirely unacceptable behaviour either way.) Kirsten, a true professional, whose performance was never anything other than spot-on, was understandably bugged, but not nearly as much as I was. When she politely asked if it was necessary that Toby continue to visit the set, I replied, ‘Consider it taken care of.’ My plan was to explain set protocol to Toby, and suggest that if he couldn’t refrain from expressing himself about how anyone was doing their job, it was best that he not show up. My plan was for a reprimand, not a ban.

That night, I got a lengthy email from Toby critiquing one take of a scene I had shown him as a courtesy. Based on that 30-second take, he wrote up a detailed analysis as to why he felt ‘the scene didn’t work’. Toby’s note broke the camel’s back. But he gave me a great ‘out’ by saying ‘every time I visit the set, I’m filled with anxiety’. I simply copied and pasted this phrase into a reply, and followed it up with, ‘Very easy solution to this.’ That was the full content of my letter. Toby was never banned from the set, but his future visits were strictly monitored.

1 | 2 | 3 Next page

A child of our time

From the economic and psychological bedlam of the global downturn has emerged a particularly dangerous false dichotomy: namely, that there is somehow a choice for ministers over the next few years between economic reconstruction and the repair of Britain’s broken society, and that the government (whether Labour or Conservative) must prioritise the former at the expense of the latter.

Diary

Anne Robinson

The daughter and I spent the last few days before the American election in Arizona.

Politics

Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics

The Spectator's Notes

Charles Moore

‘A money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman’s famous “helicopter drop” of money.’ So said Ben Bernanke, now the chairman of the Fed, in a speech about how to ward off the ‘extremely small’ chance of deflation, which he delivered in 2002.