Home > The Magazine > The Week

Saturday 22 November 2008

Dare to dream and make your ultimate trip a reality

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Click here for exclusive articles, offers, tasting notes and discussion

The Spectator’s Notes

Charles Moore

Wednesday, 17th May 2006

The worst thing about being conservative is that it is so bad for the character.

‘Values’ tests are becoming more popular, though, as a means of working out which immigrants will make good citizens. A common theme is emerging. A key test of your suitability is thought to be your attitude towards homosexuals. In Holland, would-be immigrants have to watch a video which includes men kissing. If they don’t like it, they are suspect. In Hesse in Germany, a naturalisation test asks, ‘Your adult son declares he is a homosexual. He says he would like to live with another man. How would you react?’ And here in Britain, Ruth Kelly is catechised about her views on homosexuality and, when she declines to answer, is considered unsuitable to preside over public policy. I haven’t seen the Dutch video, and I don’t want to, partly because I can’t get out of my head the line from The Revenger’s Tragedy, ‘That will teach you to kiss closer, not like a slobbering Dutchman’, but the point is that these tests, if honestly answered, would render probably more than half the existing population unsuitable citizens in the minds of the people who set them. Merely 30 years ago, films of men kissing would have been banned in most European countries; almost no one would have been pleased that his or her son said he wanted to live with a man, and would not have been embarrassed to admit it. Even today, no orthodox adherent of mainstream Christianity, Islam or Judaism can be pleased either. There are radical disagreements about values in our society which the test-setters seem not to recognise, or to wish to stamp out. Surely the real test of citizenship and homosexual acts is to do with respecting freedom and privacy — the difference between tolerance and approval. In a truly free society, shared approval is impossible: tolerance is the key. You don’t have to like the idea of Dutchmen kissing one another but, within reason, you should grin and bear it.

Previous page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next page

More articles from: Charles Moore | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comment

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

A child of our time

From the economic and psychological bedlam of the global downturn has emerged a particularly dangerous false dichotomy: namely, that there is somehow a choice for ministers over the next few years between economic reconstruction and the repair of Britain’s broken society, and that the government (whether Labour or Conservative) must prioritise the former at the expense of the latter.

Diary

Anne Robinson

The daughter and I spent the last few days before the American election in Arizona.

Politics

Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics

The Spectator's Notes

Charles Moore

‘A money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman’s famous “helicopter drop” of money.’ So said Ben Bernanke, now the chairman of the Fed, in a speech about how to ward off the ‘extremely small’ chance of deflation, which he delivered in 2002.