Stephen Pollard on the Lib Dem leadership race
Politics has moved on, but not much has changed for the Lib Dems. David Cameron — who is now the longest-serving party leader — is taking the Conservatives towards the centre, a prerequisite of victory. But to make that real, the Labour party has to be seen, as in 1979, 1983, 1987 and 1992, as having forfeited the right to power. Saddled with Gordon Brown, that looks more than a possibility.
That leaves the Lib Dems pretty much where they have been since 1983 — struggling to find a purpose or a niche. The party’s leadership contest is, somewhat hilariously, being presented as a battle between those who want to target potential Conservative voters and those who want to ape Charles Kennedy’s strategy of being more left-wing than Labour. Hilarious, because if the party wants to maximise its vote at any given election, it has little choice in how it presents itself. As a vehicle for protest votes from those who are unhappy with either the Labour or Conservative party, it must position itself in reaction to the electorate’s view of the main parties. With a resurgent Conservative party, it would be crazy to target the Conservatives. With an ever-weakening Labour party, it would be crazy not to target disillusioned Labour voters.
Nick Clegg or Chris Huhne: the party’s vote might dip and bob a few points, but the Lib Dems will remain what they always have been.
More articles from: Stephen Pollard | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
From the economic and psychological bedlam of the global downturn has emerged a particularly dangerous false dichotomy: namely, that there is somehow a choice for ministers over the next few years between economic reconstruction and the repair of Britain’s broken society, and that the government (whether Labour or Conservative) must prioritise the former at the expense of the latter.
The daughter and I spent the last few days before the American election in Arizona.
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
‘A money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman’s famous “helicopter drop” of money.’ So said Ben Bernanke, now the chairman of the Fed, in a speech about how to ward off the ‘extremely small’ chance of deflation, which he delivered in 2002.
Tamzin Lightwater's unique take on the week
The Spectator on Deripaska-gate
After a gripping week of political theatre in Manchester, James Forsyth invites readers to submit nominations for a new category in our Parliamentarian of the Year Awards: the prize for the Readers’ Representative
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
James Forsyth reviews the week in politics
Matthew d'Ancona reviews the week in politics
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Frank Leader
October 18th, 2007 6:32amAt Prime Minister’s Question Time 17th October 2007 Answering a question from Vince Cable Gordon Brown, Paid tribute to Sir Menzies Campbell. He then congratulated Vince Cable on his temporary Leadership of the Lib. Dems. He then said “If things continue at the present rate of change in this parliament”. “Every single Liberal Member will have the chance to be MEMBER of the Liberal Party”. Was this his way of helping?
stephen Deaves
October 21st, 2007 2:29pmExcellent article. Who cares who is leader of the Lib Dems? I thought that whoever got the job then had the right to lose two elections. What has happened? The Lib Dems will lose the biggest asset they had as the nice party. They will be percived as harsher than the other parties!
Alan Joel
November 16th, 2007 6:01pmwith 25% of the vote the Lib Demsshould have had approx 150 seats under any propotional system as happens world wide with democradies od more than 2 parties so everyoneelse is out of step !