Leading article
How to save the Union
The Spectator on Malcolm Rifkind's answer to the West Lothian question
Sir Malcolm’s proposal would involve the Speaker or an independent committee ‘certifying’ bills or parts of them as specifically English. It is often claimed that this would be impossibly difficult. This was certainly not the view of Parliament’s own Procedure Committee (dominated by Labour members) in the 1998–99 session, which declared it ‘appropriate to retain special procedures for bills relating exclusively to one of the constituent countries of the United Kingdom, as currently apply to bills relating exclusively to Scotland or Wales’. Yes, this would sometimes be complex. But it was Labour that set this process in train with its devolution legislation: the Rifkind answer would simply correct some of the gross asymmetries created by that original reform.
The PM’s interest in Britishness is an honourable pursuit, at a time when the nature of allegiance, citizenship and shared national culture is being questioned as never before. But if Mr Brown is serious about preserving the Union, he must accept that the sensitivities of England are no less important than those of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The fuel of separatism is neglect. It is those who cover their ears when the West Lothian question is posed who are truly jeopardising the United Kingdom.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Politics
Fraser NelsonFraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
The Spectator's Notes
Charles MooreCharles Moore's reflections on the week
Diary of a Notting Hill Nobody
Tamzin Lightwater
Tamzin Lightwater's unique take on the week
The Spectator Parliamentarian of the Year Awards
Your nominations for the Readers' Representative award
Diary
Penny SmithI was without my dance partner last week.
A novice with the right ideas
The Spectator on Gordon Brown's conference speech in Manchester
Your chance to vote in the Spectator awards
James ForsythAfter a gripping week of political theatre in Manchester, James Forsyth invites readers to submit nominations for a new category in our Parliamentarian of the Year Awards: the prize for the Readers’ Representative
Politics
James ForsythJames Forsyth reviews the week in politics
Make your excuses and go
The Spectator on the difficulties engulfing the Government
Politics
Fraser NelsonFraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Scott Forsyth
November 17th, 2007 2:18amThe final comment in this article is spot on. The English must have something comparable to the rest of the UK countries where Westminsiter could be used for Defence foreign and EU policy and conflicting or areas of mutual concern to debate. Canada and the US are the perfect example to save the Union we must address what the English need. Iam a passionate Scot and Brit and would be devastated if any UK member left the union!