Gordon Brown lacks urgency and only picks fights that he knows he can win.
For these reasons, the Prime Minister may postpone a battle on civil liberties. He seems keen to postpone a battle on anything: from the general election to the European Union referendum. Postponing battles is fast becoming the essence of Brownism. That is why Jacqui Smith, his Home Secretary, says she does not know what the correct limit on detention without charge should be — she wants to launch consultation, thereby striking a stylistic change from Mr Blair’s approach. This absence of urgency is evident in much that Mr Brown says and does. Brownism is to be found in things that are not yet happening more readily than things that actually are.
The Labour MPs who are impatiently asking to see the ‘vision’ which Mr Brown has promised to lay out must now consider an unpalatable truth. It is already lying before them. It is in this mosaic of micro-initiatives, a promise not so much of ‘jam tomorrow’ but of ‘jam by 2020’. It is a vision that has as its founding principle avoiding conflict where victory is not guaranteed. The MPs who had grown used to the Blair-style boldness must reconcile themselves to a more humdrum future. This may very well be as good as it gets.
More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
From the economic and psychological bedlam of the global downturn has emerged a particularly dangerous false dichotomy: namely, that there is somehow a choice for ministers over the next few years between economic reconstruction and the repair of Britain’s broken society, and that the government (whether Labour or Conservative) must prioritise the former at the expense of the latter.
The daughter and I spent the last few days before the American election in Arizona.
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
‘A money-financed tax cut is essentially equivalent to Milton Friedman’s famous “helicopter drop” of money.’ So said Ben Bernanke, now the chairman of the Fed, in a speech about how to ward off the ‘extremely small’ chance of deflation, which he delivered in 2002.
Tamzin Lightwater's unique take on the week
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
James Forsyth reviews the week in politics
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
James Forsyth reviews the week in politics
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Scary Biscuis
November 10th, 2007 12:45pmIn the shadowy but nontheless real, Labour leadership election last year John Reid said that if Gordon Brown had policy suprises then he should let people know what they are. The argument being that people could then judge his policies and 'vision' on its merits. Back then, the fear was that people wouldn't like his dashing new policies. Yes, the Bank independence was a nice surprise but others in the same style may not be so ammenable. Now, the slowly dawning terror is that the real reason that Brown kept his ideas so secret wasn't because he was afraid of them being copied but simply because he didn't have any.