Gordon Brown's attempt to control everything means he controls nothing
Mr Brown is being compared to a swimmer surrounded by sharks who, instead of dealing with the situation, asks who sent the sharks. A remarkable example is the witch hunt to find the ‘Whitehall knight’ who recently had lunch with Sue Cameron of the Financial Times and inspired a wonderfully acerbic report on how Mr Brown is regarded by the civil service. I am told Mr Brown is reasonably confident he has now narrowed the group of suspects down to three.
This gives a worrying sense of Prime Ministerial priorities. One can lose the personal details of 25 million Britons with impunity — but there is to be no hiding-place for civil servants who gossip with journalists during lunch. The message is going out that those who take on No. 10 will be identified and destroyed. But it is precisely this attempt to control which is leading to lack of control. Mr Brown’s danger radar is blipping red with disloyal insiders. It seems not to be scanning the political horizon of the outside world, which is perhaps why accidents seem to be coming out of the blue.
Mr Brown is behaving at the start of his premiership in the same way that Lady Thatcher did at the very end of hers. ‘What are they doing now?’ she would ask despairingly of her Cabinet: the battles had become so intense that the government itself was divided into them and us. In the same way, Mr Brown seems to regard his Cabinet members as human shields who exist to take bullets for him when there is bad news. This is why the beleaguered Mr Darling will stay, for now. His battered body is good for a few more bullets yet.
It is as if Mr Brown has spent so long as a factional leader that he has not grasped the organic unity of his government. If a member of his Cabinet takes a hit, he has not escaped: his reputation also suffers. His skills in fighting internal wars with rival Labour factions may have swept him to No. 10 — but they are not fit for purpose now that he has got there. Yes, the Treasury could be run on a tight leash — not so an entire government.
If the Prime Minister has not yet grasped this, his colleagues have. One could see the grim realisation in the drained expression of those on the Labour benches as they listened to Mr Darling on Tuesday. It was more than a bad day at the office for the Chancellor, far more than a humiliation for the Prime Minister. This was the day when the government’s reputation for competence died.
More articles from: Fraser Nelson | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The Spectator on the difficulties engulfing the Government
Tony Parsons visits Tokyo
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Tamzin Lightwater's unique take on the week
Dot Wordsworth continues her look at BBC booklets on pronunciation published in the 1930s
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Irwin Stelzer reviews the week in politics
Matthew d'Ancona reviews the week in politics
The Spectator on the Labour leadership speculation
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Julian Cox
November 23rd, 2007 2:13pmHaving quite rightly behaved like a dog with a juicy bone over the election fiasco, why is it that now there is something over which the nation does in fact have every right to be consulted - a clearly incompetent administration without an electoral mandate - Cameron and the Conservative front bench are silent on the issue? We should immediately turn to our friends in the Country Alliance to find a hound desperate for the smell of blood and capable of going into full cry. There can't be so great a carbon pawprint over a can of Chum, can there? Never was there a stronger case for a concerted campaign to let the people choose. If it is not parties that win elections but governments that lose them, Brown would be sent to the gulag of electoral opprobrium that he alone has created. Unleash the pack from the kennels!
J ogden
November 25th, 2007 7:20pmThe reason brown put darling as chancelor is he could not do the job of the transport minister properly make a mess of one and promote them to a higher post how dense can one get.by the way have we got a m.p called blair is it right he is in the middle east i wonder what he will get up to nexst/
John O'Kane
November 28th, 2007 8:03am"...reputation for competence"????