Spectator readers respond to recent articles
All this goes to demonstrate a dangerous loss of proportion. The last time the United Kingdom was engaged in a real war in defence of her sovereign independence was in 1939–1945, and the enemy then was not a scattering of bedsit plotters with homemade bombs, but the formidable armed forces of Nazi Germany. Islamist outrages such as those in London in 2005, however appalling in themselves and their impact on victims and their families, simply cannot be compared to the 1940–1941 ‘Blitz’ on London and other British cities, or the 1944–1945 bombardment by flying bombs and V-2 rockets.
Similarly, it is ludicrous for Coughlin to claim that the British army in Iraq and Afghanistan is waging ‘war on terror’. The current Iraqi insurgency is the direct product of the Bush–Blair invasion of Iraq five years ago. Saddam Hussein himself was a secular dictator and the sworn enemy of Islamic extremism. Left in place, he could have served as our tacit ally against Osama bin Laden and al-Qa’eda. As for Afghanistan, we have President Karzai’s own testimony that the Anglo-American occupation forces are now serving to exacerbate the country’s internal tensions rather than foster a solution.
Correlli Barnett
Norwich
Tax return
Sir: Anthony J. Burnet makes two interesting points in his comment on my ‘Economics of Mr Brown’ (Letters, 26 January). The first is that my questioning of the proposed new taxes on the worldwide income of non-domiciled foreigners should have been ‘tempered’ with a recognition of the fact that the US does just that: taxes the worldwide income of foreigners resident in America. He is quite right, and can’t be held responsible for not having read my fuller discussion of the issue in the Daily Telegraph (9 January), in which I explicitly recognised that fact. But I added that this disparity might well be offset by the fact that foreigners in the UK pay a sales tax, known as VAT, of 17.5 per cent, while Brits residing in America generally pay 8 per cent or less. If the goal is equality of tax treatment, both countries would have to rip up their tax codes and start over.
Equally important, Mr Burnet claims that foreigners living in America receive ‘no recognition of their charitable donations unless they happen to be to US-based charities.’ True, but only in so far as it goes. Most UK educational and cultural institutions, as well as others, have US branches, known as ‘American Friends of . . .’ For example, my wife is president of American Friends of Wigmore Hall; we regularly contribute to it and other UK-based institutions by writing cheques to the American Friends of this or that organisation, something Brits living in the US can easily do — and deduct those contributions from taxable income.
Irwin Stelzer
London WC2
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The Spectator on the return of inflation
Joan Collins reflects on a week of parties
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
Fraser Nelson on the coming political week
Theodore Dalrymple delivers a global warning
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
Glasgow East symbolises — as few other places in Britain can — the fact that the problem Labour faces is not just lack of leadership but lack of mission. What is to be seen in this constituency encapsulates and dramatises Labour’s abject failures to comprehend, let alone tackle, the nature of the poverty which grips our council estates.
For all the latest on the Glasgow East by-election, visit Coffee House
The Spectator on intervening in Zimbabwe
Steve Richards reviews the week in politics
Arpad Busson's on putting together a fundraising dinner for Ark
Choose from a full range of fantastic weekend getaways across the UK with Britannia Hotels. Book online for deals on seasonal entertainment, leisure breaks and much more.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Choose from a full range of fantastic weekend getaways across the UK with Britannia Hotels. Book online for deals on...
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Herbert Thornton
January 31st, 2008 7:46pmTheodore Papadakis mentions two Greek words for which there is no equivalent word in English - and which presumably demonstrate 'gaps' in English vocabulary. Then, for some reason, he offers the example of the sun, in Greek, 'reigning as a king' as compared to the single English word that says it 'sets' - a phenomenon that he describes as 'sad'. Isn't that a bit incongruous?
I know no Greek, but to my ear the phrase 'reins as a king' - if that is the only way Greek can say that the sun sets - sounds (in English at least) ungainly and lacks even the excuse of being poetic. Does it sound better in Greek, or is in rather, a sad example of a gap in the Greek language?