Spectator readers respond to recent articles.
Martial virtues
Sir: In his article about his film of the Haditha killings (‘The burden of guilt at Haditha’, 8 March), Nick Broomfield subscribes to the tired cliché that, in war, ‘everyone is a victim’. This has been the prevailing assumption of film-makers since at least the 1970s, and I had hoped a Spectator article might take a less lazy view. Mr Broomfield’s article adds a new dimension to these prejudices only by suggesting that participation in the making of a motion picture helps to heal the scars of war.
I do not wish to make light of the serious problems faced by veterans of combat, nor question the healing power of the Anglo-American film industry, but it is mischievous of Mr Broomfield to suggest that this is the whole story. I doubt it is even the most common experience. For every soldier ‘victim’ so beloved of Hollywood, there are untold numbers who have coped admirably with the pressures of war and who, far from descending into personal chaos, continue to give valuable service as soldiers or citizens. That we are in ignorance of the thousands of kindnesses and acts of grace, small and large, by our soldiers, yet ceaselessly aware of such events as Haditha, says little about the realities of war and much about the preoccupations of our media.
Mr Broomfield’s article also substitutes emotion for reason on a narrower point. He is gracious enough to acknowledge that such events as the Haditha killings are ‘inevitable’ in war, rather than the deliberate policy of the Coalition forces. But the consequence of his final sentence — and the sensationalist headline — is that any leader who resorts to military action should face war crimes charges. That is a charter for ensuring that force of arms could never again be used in pursuit or defence of the national interest.
If Mr Broomfield would like Mr Bush and Mr Blair tried as war criminals, he is in plentiful company, and among people whose reasoning is equally impaired by their enslavement to sentiment. But I hope he bases any private impeachment movement on more rigorous thinking than he based his article.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
Penny Smith gives a rundown of her week
The Spectator on reforming the NHS
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
Steve Richards reviews the week in politics
Arpad Busson's on putting together a fundraising dinner for Ark
Anne McElvoy reviews the week in politics
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
Gordon Brown needs to start thinking about his legacy
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Choose from a full range of fantastic weekend getaways across the UK with Britannia Hotels. Book online for deals on seasonal entertainment, leisure breaks and much more.
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved