The Spectator's Notes
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
It may be that the government’s plan for oaths of allegiance for 18-year-olds in schools won’t work, but I am suspicious of the argument that it is ‘unBritish’ to make a song and dance about Britishness. In fact, a song and dance could be literally, and exactly, what are needed. Being essentially a political rather than an ethnic idea, Britishness is an artificial creation (and I mean that as a compliment). It was the careful work of leaders, thinkers, writers and artists for about 200 years. The concept helped forge a nation out of several once-warring components. It was so successful that it was taken for granted and then, partly out of left-wing ideology and partly by mistake, began to decline. Now that indigenous pupils know almost nothing about our history and our hundreds of thousands of immigrants have a very weak idea of the country of which they are becoming a part, it is complacent to say that special ceremonies are vulgar and unnecessary. We do desperately need to invent rites which help us understand who we are. It is a secular form of confirmation.
The trouble with the government’s obsession with ‘access’ to all public collections and cultural events is that it seems to trump concern for the collections/events themselves. Surely there are many works of art, objects of scholarly interest and even forms of public performance which will not attract widespread public interest but are still of great importance. Their curators and directors owe a duty to them and to posterity as well as to today’s crowds. But if access is the only criterion, let the government apply it to itself. One of the best collections of English portraits, for example, is to be found at Chevening, an official residence, usually of the Foreign Secretary. It includes Gainsborough’s portrait of Lord Chesterfield, Batoni’s portrait of Louisa Grenville (currently in the show at the National Gallery), and a group of Ramsays. At present, the Chevening collection is not open to the public, and I gather that the government pleads the impossibility of opening, because of security. But Buckingham Palace manages: it is hard to see why the Foreign Secretary needs more protection than the Queen.
Mrs Clinton keeps saying that she wants Barack Obama to be her running-mate. Mr Obama points out that he is ahead of her in the popular vote and number of delegates, so her offer is rather cheeky. The only time I ever met Mr John McCain, about three years ago, he told me at length what an admirable person and wonderful politician Mrs Clinton was. If Mr Obama pulls through and beats Mrs Clinton for the Democratic nomination, he presumably would not offer her what she offered him and, even if he did, she couldn’t accept it. But perhaps Mr McCain should ask her to be his running-mate. Wouldn’t theirs be an unbeatable combination? Or would it enrage the Republican base so much that the whole thing would fall apart?
More articles from: Charles Moore | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
The mugger's accomplice
The Spectator on the return of inflation
Diary
Joan CollinsJoan Collins reflects on a week of parties
The Spectator's Notes
Charles MooreCharles Moore's reflections on the week
The cross-party consensus on welfare reform echoes the Gingrich–Clinton revolution
Fraser NelsonFraser Nelson on the coming political week
Global Warning
Theodore DalrympleTheodore Dalrymple delivers a global warning
The Glasgow Doctrine
The Spectator on David Cameron's speech on the need for morality.
Labour needs someone with the guts to tell the party what it must do to avoid disaster
Fraser NelsonFraser Nelson on the latest at Westminster
The Spectator's Notes
Charles MooreCharles Moore reflects on the week's events
Glasgow East is Brown’s dirty little secret: a hideous, costly social experiment gone wrong
Fraser NelsonGlasgow East symbolises — as few other places in Britain can — the fact that the problem Labour faces is not just lack of leadership but lack of mission. What is to be seen in this constituency encapsulates and dramatises Labour’s abject failures to comprehend, let alone tackle, the nature of the poverty which grips our council estates.
For all the latest on the Glasgow East by-election, visit Coffee House
The old order changeth
The Spectator on David Davis' resignation
Latest blog posts
sponsored links
Britannia - Weekend Breaks Across the UK
Choose from a full range of fantastic weekend getaways across the UK with Britannia Hotels. Book online for deals on seasonal entertainment, leisure breaks and much more.
Sky - Official Site
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month
Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus or sky hd.
Britannia - Weekend Breaks Across the UK
Choose from a full range of fantastic weekend getaways across the UK with Britannia Hotels. Book online for deals on...
Sky - Official Site
Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.
ROME CENTRE
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
City Breaks. ROME and PARIS
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
DougS
March 13th, 2008 4:01pmCharles Moore is usually among the most astute commentators going; maybe because I've only read him on British politics, because his suggestion about Mrs. Clinton is absolutely absurd. As a practical matter (and I'm sure he knows this) it just doesn't work that way in terms of picking your VP from your party opponents. But whatever McCain thinks of Mrs. Clinton personally and as a member of the loyal opposition, their view of the world, politically, is completely different. Not a shred of logic: Yes, it would infuriate the Republican base (and his advisors would prevent it), but it wouldn't get any additional votes. No one votes because of a VP. And, too, McCain esp. at 71 has obligations to posterity with his running mate . . . and anyway there are tons of excellent Republican candidates for VP. As we "Yanks" say, Mr. Moore is coming out of left field with that one. Stick to British politics, Chuck, where there are few better (looking forward to the Maggie book(s)!).