Liz Suggests

Email registration

Free weekly email update

Great products and special offers for Spectator readers

Click here for great value events

Diary

Trevor Phillips

Wednesday, 23rd April 2008

Trevor Phillips debates immigration and follows Chelsea in Europe

It’s Powell week. I am due to speak at the site of his infamous ‘rivers of blood’ speech on Sunday, a rather clever idea dreamed up by my colleagues at the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Kamal Ahmed and Patrick Diamond. I must admit I had initial reservations about the proposal. After all, I am a serious public official, and among our breed the idea of speaking in plain English to the Great British Public about things that actually bother them has never found much favour. However, I can see the value of trying to kick-start a new debate about immigration. We are no longer the country of colonial immigration into which I was born. The real migration issue today is economic — how we ride the tidal wave of talented people which is sweeping across the globe. Other nations are cherry-picking the best while we fret over whether we can ‘afford’ more immigrants. The truth is that if we don’t compete, our grandchildren will curse us for leaving them to survive in an economic backwater called Britain unless, that is, they can get work permits to the world’s dominant economies — China, India, Brazil, Australia and the USA.

I reflect on all this as I sit on the platform at the annual meeting of the gay rights pressure group, Stonewall. The QEII Conference Centre hall is packed, not with stereotypical Village People lookalikes, but earnest folk from Britain’s biggest companies, worrying about how to make sure that their companies gets their hands on the so-called ‘pink pound’, a billion-plus bonus that Ben Summerskill, the organisation’s chief executive, has deployed brilliantly. My guess is that most of the 300 or so people listening to me aren’t lesbian or gay at all, but just see this diversity thing as good business. The man from the Royal Bank of Scotland, who is middle-aged, and what our red-tops would describe as a ‘family man’, i.e. probably not gay, rather disconcertingly says: social justice is a good thing — but frankly I’m a banker, so what I’m really interested in is how I get hold of your money. It’s a world that old Enoch would have found baffling.

1 | 2 | 3 Next page

More articles from: Trevor Phillips | this section

Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (4)

Subscribe Now 12 issues for £12 in the UK : Gift subscriptions : Overseas subscriptions

Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

David

April 24th, 2008 3:26pm

"Other nations are cherry-picking the best while we fret over whether we can ‘afford’ more immigrants"

Er, no, other nations are also fretting whether they can afford more immigrants too. What world are you living in?

rhory fraser

April 25th, 2008 5:42pm

Who elected Racistfinder General Trevor Phillips and what exactly is the nature of this platform from which he hectors the rest of the population with his absurd, unrepresentative opinions? Our backpockets.

And the idea that Nick Griffin doesn't recognise Trevor Phillips when he and his party have outflanked him with a clever stunt by booking the hotel room next to theirs, is pure self-delusion

David Preiser

April 26th, 2008 6:14pm

Why do dance around the real problem with football metaphors about "integration"? Wouldn't you have more effect if you just spelled it out that people's real concern is that too many concessions granted to immigrants will result in the natives being forced to surrender all of their own values?

Cui Nono

April 27th, 2008 5:42pm

Here is my chance to thank you and your colleagues in the race industry for your efforts over the years in making this country a paradise of racial and cultural harmony. Had we been asked, we could not have wished for better.