Monday 7 July 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Liz Anderson

Liz suggests


Abolishing the 10p tax rate shattered the contract on which New Labour was based

Wednesday, 7th May 2008

Frank Field reviews the week in politics

Why is the abolition of the 10p rate of tax unlike any other rebellion of backbench Labour MPs? The answer lies in the mood of Labour backbenchers following decades of modernising the party, a process that began under Neil Kinnock but only became a root and branch operation under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Repeated Labour defeats in the 1950s were accompanied by the burst of outriders demanding a revision of an exclusively economic definition of socialism. This plea ought to have fallen on fertile ground. There has always been a sizeable proportion of activists who believe that socialism could not be achieved without first changing the kind of people we are. Herbert Morrison, Peter Mandelson’s grandfather, touched on this when he claimed that socialism can only be built by socialists.

Morrison’s plea was, sadly, a backward cry to a lost age. Emphasis on Labour’s ethical roots lost its dominance when Ramsay MacDonald formed the 1931 National Government against the overwhelming wishes of the Labour Movement. MacDonald was the chief proponent of the fundamental importance of developing a nobility of character. Following the 1931 debacle, not only was MacDonald viewed as a charlatan but, as a consequence, his approach to politics became deeply suspect. In place of ethical regeneration of individuals the Labour party looked increasingly to a more mechanistic basis to underpin radical change. That mechanical approach centred, first, on nationalising much of the economy, and then, as a result of the success of the war economy, of central planning.

Labour’s 1960s revisionism began the long march to New Labour. The electorate of the 1950s had already jettisoned any hope Labour had of building a revival around a planned economy, no matter how much the verb planning was prefaced by the adverb democratic. Anthony Crosland, now the best remembered of the early revisionists, attempted to prise Labour away from the belief that only by nationalising the commanding heights of the economy could socialism be established. Labour instead needed to stress equality as its goal and high public expenditure as a means of achieving this new society.

More articles from: Frank Field | this section

Subscribe now

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Edwin

May 8th, 2008 2:32pm

"Socialism" - A flawed ideology based on utopic nonsense. I wish the socialists would keep it amongst themselves and stop trying to impose it on perfectly innocent people looking to improve themselves. The only achievement of Labour over the last decade is to keep the no-hopers where they and frustrate those who wish to climb the social and career ladder.

EyeSee

May 8th, 2008 8:17pm

Frank, I fear you assume too much of your fellows. Labour MP's in general and far left in particular are the most assiduous in seeking pay rises and fiddling their expenses. Anguished for the poor? Not in the slightest, for them the genius of New Labour is power without responsibility and lots of money. Another house, Tony?

Mark Musoke

May 8th, 2008 8:19pm

Erudite as usual but misses the central problem of New Labour. Crosland has not been proven wrong yet! Real change comes from within not without...
Sadly Mandelson, Blair et al have pedalled a complete middle-class charade. Blatcherism began when well meaning and some "socialist" people said that selection and competeition were wrong. Social mobility has steadily declined since. Those middle classes with the knowledge have persistently lined their pockets, elbowed their way around and promoted a false meritocracy. Politicians have become professionalised and ever more insular. Sadly fewer and fewer of them could hold down a real job in the outside world. Has everyone forgotten 1976? This country is once again becoming an economic basket-case. Tax credits are just a form of continuous electoral bribery and not sensible fiscal planning. Please can we all just get real!

Dexey

May 8th, 2008 8:27pm

"Labour MPs are horrified to find that many of their poorest constituents are made worse off. They need no reminding, as some of the London media do, that £2 or £3 a week is for these households a significant part of their budgets at any time, but particularly so when prices are on the rise."

Allow me , Mr Field to quote from a letter from the Treasury signed on behalf of Rt Hon Jane Kennedy MP:
" There are some low income individuals who..........may see a small loss from the personal tax package announced at Budget 2007. However, these losses will be relatively modest, at around 32 per week on average.

the problem is not the London Media understanding but the labour MP's who are ministers.

Merda taurorum animas conturbit

May 9th, 2008 9:40am

I suspect the real reason Labour MPs are in a tizzy has less to do with concern for the pockets of their poorer constituents and more the fact that those constituents are no longer willing to unthinkingly vote for the self-proclaimed 'party of the working man' (but which is, in reality, the vehicle whereby a trendy metropolitan elite gets to keep its snout into the trough of public sector jobs and cash).

John Hutchings

May 9th, 2008 4:56pm

Combine the above with John Hutton's speech of 10/03/2008

"Rather than questioning whether huge salaries are morally justified, we should celebrate the fact that people can be enormously successful in this country. Our overarching goal that no one should get left behind must not become translated into a stultifying sense that no one should be allowed to get ahead.

‘I believe a key challenge for New Labour over the coming years is to recognise that, far from strengthening social justice, a version of equality that only gives you the opportunity to climb so far, actually subverts the values we should be representing."

and it all amounts to an end of 100 years of supporting the underdog.

Derek Harvey

May 10th, 2008 6:02am

I am a pensioner living abroad, no, not a filthy one, just a chap on a modest pension finding that I can live more economically abroad than I could in the UK. As my pension is modest, the abolition of the 10p rate of Income Tax for the first few thousand pounds of taxable income means that I shall be paying twice as much as much tax as I did last financial year. No, it is not big bucks, but I would sooner see it in my pocket than in somebody else's. These promised recompenses mean nothing to me unless they entail a refund of 'overpaid' tax.

Martin Morrow

May 10th, 2008 11:58am

By Jove, Frank Field pulls out all the Labour idealism history.
Pity that it's all hokum.
Labour tried to pull a fast one, as they have many times over the past 11 years.
Only this time everyone had had enough of the tax and spend.
Labour MP's are whimpering because they see the trough being take away.
Nothing like greed to motivate Labour.
Altruism? Wasn't that word banned by Hardie?

Larry from Crewe

May 10th, 2008 1:56pm

Crewe and Nantwich is already lost look at the local election results. The main cause is the mass immigration into the town with the resulting loss of job to the indigenous population and the resulting lowering of wages to the minimum wage look at the jobcentre plus site for Crewe to see that nearly all jobs advertised are at or just above the minimum wage, we now have a generation who do not know job security or have any possibility of financial security

Jock

May 10th, 2008 3:28pm

Be fair, Frank. New Labour have made it their business to help hard working families. Look how well the Blairs have done.

TDK

May 13th, 2008 4:05pm

I see, Socialism doesn't work unless you change the people.

Funny how so many socialists come to the conclusion that it isn't the policy that is wrong, it's the people. Good old philosopher-kings, always know better than their subjects. I hope you make this a central plank in Labour policy. If you do, I will be dead and buried by the time you next win.


In this section

Letters

Spectator readers respond to recent articles

Diary

Penny Smith

Penny Smith gives a rundown of her week 

The NHS needs its Reformation

The Spectator on reforming the NHS

Glasgow East is Brown’s dirty little secret: a hideous, costly social experiment gone wrong

Fraser Nelson

Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics

The Spectator's Notes

Charles Moore

Charles Moore's reflections on the week

Related articles

Some advice for Brown’s second year: find a John Reid and bring back Charles Clarke

Steve Richards

Steve Richards reviews the week in politics

Welcome to Brownland, where everything that goes wrong is blamed on one man

Anne McElvoy

Anne McElvoy reviews the week in politics

Fix your departure date now, Gordon, and give your legacy a chance

Benjamin Wegg-Prosser

Gordon Brown needs to start thinking about his legacy

The credibility crunch

The Spectator on Alistair Darling's 10p tax compensation package

Brown is not the problem

The Spectator on Labour's faltering fortunes

Spectator recommends

Sky - Official Site

Build your own Sky package online. Sky TV, Broadband & Talk only £16.

Sky TV, Broadband & Talk from £16 a Month

Sky TV & free broadband packages available from £16 a month. Choose from a standard free sky box, sky plus...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other