Spectator readers respond to recent articles
Local empowerment denied
Sir: Leo McKinstry’s experience of failing to prevent a wholly unsuitable planning application in a neighbour’s garden (‘Naked greed meets Stalinist control’, 7 June) is sadly familiar. A few years ago a developer persuaded three neighbours of ours to sell him parts of their gardens. A planning application to build five huge detached houses to fill the space was duly filed.
Essentially every single neighbour objected to this application, the only exceptions being those who had a financial interest in the application being successful. The parish council planning committee condemned the application. The local district councillors objected to the application. The application was turned down at the district level. Repeat applications were made, with trivial adjustments, often before the previous application was turned down. Eventually, the district council gave up the unequal struggle and caved in.
Of course the outcome was inevitable. The developer had too much to gain to give in. What is the loss of a view over a mature garden worth compared to the profit from developing five large detached houses on a prime site in a village in the middle of the green belt? The forces at work here are exactly the same as those that keep the Common Agricultural Policy in receipt of the lion’s share of all revenues to the EU.
Many proposals have been made to reform the Town and Country Planning Act but, as McKinstry correctly points out, this Stalinist piece of legislation works very well both for politicians and for those who fund political parties. The chances of it being significantly reformed are nil.
Stephen Hemingway
Knebworth, Hertfordshire
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
I’ve just emerged from the gym, winding down after a day’s writing, when my son Sukhraj calls, alerting me to sudden news of explosions and fatalities in Mumbai.
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Tamzin Lightwater's unique take on the week
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
‘I was excited and delighted by it in that first Bombay minute,’ says the narrator in Gregory David Roberts’s great novel Shantaram.
The Spectator on the US Presidential election
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
Charles Moore's reflections on the week
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Haldane
June 12th, 2008 12:09pmHow strange. All the comments that managed to get posted concerning d'Ancona's interview were negative.Yet here, given pride of place, is a letter praising his clarity of mind. I should say so!
Once again
June 12th, 2008 2:45pmDalrymple brutish? What rubbish. Put brutishness in its correct context here. If young scantily clad, drunken women dress like sluts, then so be it - they will be brutally regarded, brutally treated and brutally described as sluts. There is no "nice" word for scantily clad, drunks in public places.