Spectator readers respond to recent articles
Harry Cummins
Address withheld
Bad times
Sir: Rod Liddle’s ‘How to get stabbed’ (Liddle Britain, 5 July) was perceptive and spot on in all respects. The last three homicides I attended involved multiple stabbings and sexual assault. All three perpetrators had imbibed vast quantities of lager and had snorted lines of cocaine. They had spent hours clubbing and having what is called ‘a good time’. All three victims had been similarly engaged using skunk cannabis and alcohol.
These six individuals were part of the 24-hour drinking culture, with alcohol available into the small hours in pubs, clubs and supermarkets. Those of us on the front line are seeing more violence year on year. As I write (4 July) yet another south London teenager has been stabbed to death. It is all very well Her Majesty’s Government telling us that ‘overall crime is falling’. This is cold comfort to the parents bereaved by these atrocious crimes.
Dr Robin Moffat
Police Surgeon, London
Consultant in Clinical Forensic Medicine
Brighton, East Sussex
Brown study
Sir: Matthew Parris is only partially right in his analysis of why the deep-rooted deficiencies of Gordon Brown were ignored in his apparently effortless rise to the premiership (Another Voice, 5 July). In fact, his bullying, foul-mouthed temper tantrums were widely known and commented upon for years — not the least example of which was Tom Bower’s biography in 2004. Brown is very good at reducing lesser mortals to tears. One has only to read the account of his first day at the Treasury to understand the combination of ruthlessness, arrogance and ill manners that go to make up ‘Gordon’.
More articles from: | this section
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
‘I was excited and delighted by it in that first Bombay minute,’ says the narrator in Gregory David Roberts’s great novel Shantaram.
New Labour has always preserved from the hard Left the Leninist idea that the party (or, in Blair/Brown theory, ‘the project’) is the only reality to be respected.
I’ve just emerged from the gym, winding down after a day’s writing, when my son Sukhraj calls, alerting me to sudden news of explosions and fatalities in Mumbai.
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Fraser Nelson reviews the week in politics
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
The Spectator on tax cuts
Spectator readers respond to recent articles
The Spectator on the financial crisis
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be amongst the first to have it - order now.
Subscribe to Sky from £16 a month. Get free equipment and free broadband - Join Now. Sky HD - be...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Anonymous Mark II
July 10th, 2008 8:09amInstead of simply printing Harry Cummins' letter, why does the Spectator not commission him to write a series of articles on Islam? God knows, this magazine publishes enough taqiyya from Moslems and their enablers, as per the latest drivel about Sharia. I know a great deal about Islam but my statements, backed up by correct references and accreditations to the Koran, ahadith and sira, are not printed in the readers' comments because they illustrate perfectly that there is no moderation in Islam, that it is an intolerant, violent, seditious political ideology and that this continued talking around but never about the subject, is insulting to your readership and ultimately treasonable because it leaves the readership withoout the necessary knowledge to reach certain conclusions and take certain steps to preserve their nation, institutions and security. BTW, I'm not the same 'Anonymous' who in a Melanie Phillips' thread a few days back, also complained of being censored by the Spectator when he/she tried to mention Muhammad. We are Legion, it seems.