A scribbling spat

The prognosis is grave for the Booker Prize, say more than a few literary commentators in response to the news that a cabal of publishers, authors and agents plan to establish a “well-funded prize” that would have a “different set of priorities” to the Booker. For different “set of priorities”, read “high-brow”; the prize may also be open to American authors. Spokesman for the nascent Literature Prize, Andrew Kidd, told the Bookseller that the prize would:

‘establish a clear and uncompromising standard of excellence…For many years this brief was fulfilled by the Booker (latterly the Man Booker) Prize. But as numerous statements by that prize’s administrator and this year’s judges illustrate, it now prioritises a notion of ‘readability’ over artistic achievement…This will be a prize chosen by experts—writers, professional critics, people immersed in literature. There are so many books out there and everyone is looking for guidance. People like to know they have been judged by experts—otherwise it would be like the gymnastics at the Olympics being judged by you or me.