Images of Dutch rioters throwing stones and fireworks at police, looting shops and facing water cannon have been published all around the world. This is not the typical image of a nation that likes to think of itself as nuchter and normaal — sober and sensible — in contrast to other parts of Europe, it sees as impulsive or, even worse, undemocratic.
But in the last four nights, after the Netherlands imposed a 9 p.m. curfew to combat the spread of coronavirus, elements of the country appear to have gone entirely off-script. To the condemnation of national politicians, horrified businesses and huge numbers of normal people who have been in lockdown since October, thousands of youths across the country have turned peaceful protests into what Eindhoven mayor John Jorritsma said is ‘heading toward civil war’.
Dutch sociologists and criminologists, however, are not entirely surprised. The Netherlands is a country with a broad, libertarian notion of freedom, where the lockdowns have been mild up until now, partly because of basic rights entrenched in Dutch law. Where in neighbouring Belgium schools are open, the Dutch have had their children at home now since December. Restaurants, bars, gyms and non-essential shops are all shut and, in the depths of January, there isn’t much light or even snow to lift the oppressive gloom.
With a general election coming in March, far-right parties such as Geert Wilders’s Party for Freedom and the new Forum for Democracy have been stoking opposition to lockdown — and despite their condemnations of the violence, these parties have been blamed by some left-wing politicians for ‘taking lessons from Donald Trump’s playbook’.
Already, says Matthew Rodger, Netherlands analyst at The Economist Intelligence Unit, the general Dutchman is more hostile to state control.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in