For lovers of self-destructive hubris – a quality that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex surely possess in spades – the saga of Prince Harry’s security is surely the gift that keeps on giving. Not since Jeremy Thorpe ensured that his former lover Norman Scott was deprived of his National Insurance card has anyone publicly expressed a grievance with so much fervour and repetitiveness as Harry’s attempts to obtain taxpayer-funded armed protection whenever he brings his family back to Britain. But now, in this season of miracles, it looks as if he might have got his wish, after all.
It seemed certain, after various expensive and amusingly humiliating courtroom defeats, that Harry’s desire to hire members of the Met as his private security detail whenever he is back in the country of his birth would be denied. He even railed against the government’s successful attempts to thwart his desires as a ‘good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up’, blustering:
The other side have won in keeping me unsafe. I can’t see a world in which I will be bringing my wife and children back at this point.
Ravec might still decide to maintain the status quo: cue weeping and gnashing of teeth if so
Those of us who are not losing sleep at the prospect of the star of With Love, Meghan once again bringing her special brand of joy to the United Kingdom were not, perhaps, beside themselves at this prospect.
Yet there has now been an unexpected volte-face, courtesy of the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and the Home Office. Ravec, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, has ordered that its risk management board be prepared to reassess Harry’s threat level for the first time since February 2020. This is not a suggestion that the prince poses his own danger to the country, but instead that he is considered a public individual who deserves police protection at the highest level, in the same vein as the King or the Prime Minister. And if the decision is upheld, once again the taxpayer will be on the hook for police protection for the Sussex clan whenever they are in Britain.
It should be noted that the final decision will not be made until next month, and that Ravec might still decide to maintain the status quo: cue weeping and gnashing of teeth if so. However, the fact that there has been a reassessment of this nature after a protracted and expensive court fight, which Harry repeatedly lost, must be seen as a surprisingly non-Pyrrhic victory for the Duke of Sussex. It is also a suggestion that he was justified in the fuss that he has so consistently made.
Still, even if he is granted this belated Christmas wish, it is uncertain as to whether or not the Sussexes will be frequent visitors here once again. This is despite the sentimental protestations that the King would like to see his grandchildren once again. Meghan has not set foot in London since Elizabeth II’s funeral in September 2022, and it is doubtful that she has any pressing urge to do so. Her husband’s largely successful solo trip back here in September – only slightly overshadowed by the eventual leaks of his rapprochement with his semi-estranged father – demonstrated that he is perfectly capable of conducting a quasi-royal visit home by himself and being well received in the process.
Many might think that the current situation works well for all concerned, then, and would question the necessity of an expensive, time-consuming climbdown by Ravec. But in a year of consistently dreadful tidings for the royal family, the knowledge that 2026 might yet see a comeback by the cadet branch – with commensurate focus on the ongoing estrangement between Harry and his elder brother – is yet another reason for the Firm not to be cheerful.
Comments