Sebastian Payne

It’s perpetually grim up north — or is it?

Should the government simply give up on Middlesbrough, Burnley, Hartlepool and Hull? In a leader titled City slickers, The Economist argues that these towns are trapped in a spiral of decline and attempts to ‘save’ them are futile:

‘Middlesbrough, Burnley, Hartlepool, Hull and many others were in trouble even before the financial crisis. These days their unemployment rates are roughly double the national average, and talented young people are draining away (see article). Their high streets are thick with betting shops and payday lenders, if they are not empty.’

Their solution? Pay people to relocate to successful areas:

‘Governments should not try to rescue failing towns. Instead, they should support the people who live in them. That means helping them to commute or move to places where there are jobs—and giving them the skills to get those jobs’

Although somewhat insensitive to the people living there, the article makes a valid point. Some areas of Britain have been in decline for decades, and it’s a problem no government seems able to solve. Take a look at this interactive tool from the Office of National Statistics on how the regional gross value added (economic value of goods/services from an area) has changed for the places mentioned above. Tyneside, for example, has seen its regional value per head actually slide since 1997:

Screen Shot 2013-10-12 at 19.02.35

There is also a question about the Labour Party’s role in this long-term economic decline. As the Economist says, successive Labour governments have tried to help these towns by propping them up with piles of public money. In my home town of Gateshead, this can be seen with the Baltic art centre or Sage music complex (pictured above). Both

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in