Steerpike Steerpike

Peer asks why nuclear war would be ‘unwelcome’

Parliament TV

War, what is it good for? So asked The Temptations about Vietnam. But now a maverick independent peer appears to be answering that question quite seriously. As Westminster works itself into a frenzy over possible conflict with Russia, Lord Truscott – a non-affiliated member of the Upper House – has used the subject to ask the British government for its stance on nuclear oblivion. For Truscott, who was one of the first peers suspended from the House of Lords since the 17th century, has raised eyebrows with his latest inquiries to defence minister Baroness Goldie. The former MEP recently tabled the following question:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Goldie on 29 November, what are their reasons for believing that a thermonuclear war with Russia would be an “unwelcome outcome.”

Dr Strangelove, eat your heart out. An unimpressed Goldie replied that: 

It is difficult to envisage any scenario in which war, whether accidental, thermonuclear or otherwise, and irrespective of which other parties may be involved, would be a welcome outcome.

Talk about having the minister on the ropes. Was Truscott being serious or simply enjoying his power trip? If he carries on fishing with questions like this, Mr S wonders if it’ll be his fellow peers going nuclear instead.

Screenshot_2022-02-15_at_11.05.02.png

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in