Sebastian Payne

What is in Nick Clegg’s shopping basket for the Lib Dem conference?

Now that Lords reform is entirely off the agenda, Nick Clegg faces the complicated task of negotiating a policy battle to keep his party happy. Pursuing AV and an elected House of Lords were core to Clegg’s justification to his party for power, so he now has to find something significant to avoid ‘going naked’ to his conference in September. We’ll find out more in the next hour about what the Lib Dems’ intentions are for the boundary reforms, which they have linked with Lords reform, but Clegg will want other policy victories, not just battles, to show he is delivering. These are some of the likely policies the Lib Dems may now push for:

More representation in the government

Likely. As James reported yesterday, David Laws is set to return in a policy capacity that will beef up their representation in the Cabinet. But don’t expect to see any more Lib Dem ministers, which would surely annoy already anxious Tories who remain concerned about their career advancement opportunities.

Mansion Tax

Quite likely. The Treasury has been consulting with rough ideas on a tax for expensive properties, so this may appear in one form or another. However, the Tories previously blocked such a tax during the 2012 Budget so introducing it now would be a significant concession to the Lib Dems. But after the loss of House of Lords, it may be necessary.

Party funding reform

Semi-likely. Along with constitutional reform, this is one of the great Lib Dem causes. Reforms have already been discussed between the partners but party funding is a can of worms that has been kicked down the road many times. If pursued, it may look overly venal by stitching up Labour with a deal that primarily aids the Lib Dems.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in