Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Where’s the contrast?

I’ve read and re-read Cameron’s speech on the economy, hoping that I had somehow missed the radical message to answer Gordon Brown. I have given up.

Britain is facing a tsunami of unemployment, two years of recession if we’re lucky and what do the Tories have to say? They’ll set up a new quango, and try to tinker with council tax. We had new phrases: instead of “irresponsible capitalism” we’re told there will be “responsible free enterprise”. His dreadful “social responsibility” phrase is making a comeback in the form of “economic responsibility” and remains just as vacuous as a concept.

Much of the detail appears worryingly wrong-headed. Cameron seems to say he’d stop another asset bubble by setting limits on how much individual banks can lend.  His “Debt Responsibility Mechanism” – a gimmicky name for adjusting bank capital-to-borrowing ratios – is being held up as a method of controlling the money supply.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in