One of the worries of Tory modernisers about the coalition back in May last year was
that the Tories would end up being seen as being responsible for all the tough but necessary stuff, eg deficit reduction, while the Lib Dems would claim the cuddly stuff, for example the pupil
premium — a policy that was in both the Tory and Lib Dem manifestos.
David Willetts in a piece in the Telegraph today, taken from a speech he’s
giving tonight, makes this point anew in the context of the new, frostier coalition relations:
“This agenda is shared, so it would be a mistake to get into a game of identifying Liberal measures and Tory ones in a perpetual trade-off. That is bad for government as it invites ministers to distance themselves from specific decisions. And, incidentally, it enables people to caricature Conservatives as not believing in social progress just when David Cameron has got people to shed this misapprehension about us.”

Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate, free for a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first month free.
UNLOCK ACCESS Try a month freeAlready a subscriber? Log in