Edward Norman

A dark and desolate world

Dostoevsky: Language, Faith and Fiction, by Rowan Williams<br /> <br type="_moz" />

issue 01 November 2008

Dostoevsky: Language, Faith and Fiction, by Rowan Williams

While the Anglican communion has been disintegrating, its symbolical head, the Archbishop of Canterbury, has been writing an analysis of Dostoevsky’s novels. This in itself presents a need for explanation: Dostoevsky has generally been assessed as an habitué of the territory between agnosticism and atheism, but Rowan Williams sees him as the author of ‘a Christocentric apologetic’. Yet the characters in Dostoevsky are miserable and dysfunctional obsessives in the main; neurotic and repulsive creations of a mind that many have judged intellectually and morally opaque. In the 19th century and throughout the Soviet era Dostoevsky’s critics considered his books unhealthy. This does not seem to worry the Archbishop, who confesses, indeed, to having found the writing of his account ‘a delight’.

He is scrupulous in avoiding censorious language in explaining the ghastly conduct and opinions of Dostoevsky’s fictional creations, and it is usually only in accounts of child-abuse that he refers to ‘contemptible behaviour’. Otherwise there is a marked emancipation from the conventional restraint that Christian writers (let alone archbishops) have tended to demonstrate in alluding to facets of human sexuality. Williams notes the ‘unequivocally erotic terms’ and ‘orgastic impulse’ of a character in Crime and Punishment without resort to euphemism; there is, similarly, little that is veiled in his explanation of ‘the assault on a symbolic and otherwise invisible penis’. This last is the meaning he attaches to a bitten finger in The Brothers Karamazov. It is doubtless very diverting, but what does it tell the reader about Heaven and Hell, life and death?

This is a study of the religious identity of the ideas articulated by Dostoevsky’s literary puppets. Williams rightly notices at once that Dostoevsky was not writing to explain whether or not God exists, and is concerned primarily — through several tortured shifts of context — with what society is like both when it is influenced by religious belief and when it is not.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in