James Delingpole James Delingpole

A girdle too far

issue 19 November 2011

Fact: in 1963, air travel was so new and exciting that the awed gasps of the passengers as the plane took flight frequently drowned out the noise of the jet engines.

Fact: in 1963, air travel was so comfortable that passengers emerged from long-haul flights even more refreshed, relaxed and cheerful than when they boarded the plane. Instead of taking their suits to the dry cleaners, canny travellers of the day would often just take a plane journey instead, knowing that their clothes would emerge at the end more pressed and immaculate than before.

Fact: in 1963, every woman looked and dressed like Jackie Kennedy, especially air stewardesses, all of whom could have doubled as models because they were just so hot.

Well, at least it’s all true if you believe the BBC’s new Mad-Men-in-the-air series Pan Am (BBC2, Wednesday). But you know, I’m not necessarily sure that I do. There’s a vogue at the moment for lovingly realised, über-authentic screen hommages to the Sixties and Seventies, but the line between ingeniously constructed verisimilitude and ludicrous pastiche is very thin. I fear Pan Am may have crossed it right from episode one.

To give you a recent film example of how easily these period recreations can go wrong, let me cite the Extra Strong Mint scene in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. The director Tomas Alfredson is probably the world’s greatest master of retro porn chic — cf. his magnificently convincing evocation of early-Eighties suburban Stockholm in Let the Right One In — and his le Carré adaptation (setting aside for a moment Gary Oldman’s beyond-bad George Smiley) looks to be evoking period and place just as impressively, till the scene right at the end when Alfredson blows it for the sake of a sweet packet.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in