James Forsyth James Forsyth

A gulf in opinion

A profile of Admiral William Fallon, the head of US Central Command, in Esquire is bound to make waves as it claims that,

“well-placed observers now say that it will come as no surprise if Fallon is relieved of his command before his time is up next spring, maybe as early as this summer, in favor of a commander the White House considers to be more pliable. If that were to happen, it may well mean that the president and vice-president intend to take military action against Iran before the end of this year and don’t want a commander standing in their way.”

The whole piece is slightly breathless and has Fallon as the one good man standing between the neo-cons and their crazy plans. It also rather glosses over what many consider the most likely cause of Fallon’s removal, the split between him and General Petraeus—and the White House—over Iraq.

Britain’s best politics newsletters

You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in