Like Alex, I don’t believe this is necessarily evidence of racism. The “Oxbridge problem” has always been that so few people from un-posh backgrounds apply. They, their parents or teachers simply feel these are not institutions where they will feel comfortable. Mr Massie is right to point to the Virtual Economics website’s critique of the Guardian’s coverage of the statistics.
In case anyone suspects me of primitive class resentment, I should at this point declare that I went to an independent school and a Cambridge college, where, needless to say, I was admitted entirely on the basis of merit. However, there is no doubt that my school knew one of Oxbridge’s best-kept secrets: that the ratio of applicants to places is often very low indeed. If you have good A-levels , the odds compared to any of the other Russell Group universities are very good indeed.
Oxford and Cambridge have made great efforts over the past two decades to diversify its student body. There is ample evidence that the prejudice runs in the other direction: inverted snobbery from state schools who discourage students from applying.
However, there is another way of looking at all this. Oxbridge should not be happy to take its students from such a limited pool of talent. As an elite world-beating university it should make every effort to reach out to the brightest students in the country, including those from the African-Caribbean community. I am now convinced that we should have a post-examination application system to allow universities to know the results of the students before they offer them places. This would also allow them to reach out to high-performing students who had not considered applying to Oxbridge or discouraged from doing so.