Charles Moore’s
column in the Telegraph today is one of the best articles you’ll read this year. The nub of his argument is that:
The question of motive is going to be crucial in politics these next few years.“Mr Cameron finds himself the heir both to Blair and to Thatcher. To Blair, because he has had to take his party away from its preferred territory and pay attention instead to what actual voters worry about. To Thatcher, because he confronts a crisis of the public finances even more severe than the one she faced. He also leads a coalition. So, unlike Mrs Thatcher, he wants to woo and to warn, please and prophesy at the same time. Can it be done, as she implied that it could not? It has to be. Mr Cameron’s only way of holding a majority together in such economic adversity is to convince enough people that he has honourable motives and does not like inflicting pain.”

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in