The jam factory is no more. In one of the great theatrical transformations of our day, the RSC has unveiled its modernisation of Elizabeth Scott’s unloved theatre of 1932; unloved for its ungainly brick bulk on the Avon riverside but no less for the distance of its seating from the proscenium stage. There was much to be said for the earlier proposal of simply razing the building to the ground and starting afresh. What has actually happened is a classic British compromise whereby the best of the old has been spliced together with what is hopefully the best of the new.
The jam factory is no more. In one of the great theatrical transformations of our day, the RSC has unveiled its modernisation of Elizabeth Scott’s unloved theatre of 1932; unloved for its ungainly brick bulk on the Avon riverside but no less for the distance of its seating from the proscenium stage. There was much to be said for the earlier proposal of simply razing the building to the ground and starting afresh. What has actually happened is a classic British compromise whereby the best of the old has been spliced together with what is hopefully the best of the new.
Stripped of ill-advised accretions, you can now appreciate why the ingeniously patterned brickwork and art-deco detailing helped to win the design competition for the 29-year-old cousin of Sir Giles Gilbert Scott (other entries had included a castellated monastery and a cathedral with two domed towers — nothing new in ecclesiastical attempts to appropriate Shakespeare). Into Elizabeth Scott’s rectangular shell has been dropped the huge curving back wall of a smaller, thrust-stage auditorium. Just over a thousand seats crowd in around the stage on three levels. The distance between the stage and the furthest seat has virtually been halved (from 27m to 15m), but a price is paid in that those in the circle and upper circle appear to be almost vertiginously piled upon each other.
The argument for the new layout is that as Shakespeare’s own stage was surrounded by the audience on three sides that is what we should give him today.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in