This week sees the centenary of the birth in York of W. H. Auden. All over the world this season, Audenites should at 1755 hours precisely prepare a very cold, very dry Martini and at 1800 hours, six o’clock, again precisely, down it in praise and memory of a giant of English letters. Vital to be meticulous about the hour. As he said of himself in an autobiographical sketch:
So obsessive a ritualist
a pleasant surprise
makes him cross.
Without a watch
he would never know when
to feel hungry or horny.
Like many Oxford undergraduates of my generation (he was Professor of Poetry when I went up), I knew Auden slightly and dined with him a few times. He had aged prematurely, become repetitive and, away from the page, fairly boring. Like his friend and contemporary, John Betjeman, he had long invented a persona — dotty vicar in his case — but Auden got trapped by it. Prone to chant curious mantra — ‘Yeats was not my idea of a gentleman’ or ‘Peeing in the washbasin is a male privilege’ — he smelt like a forgotten cheese. Yet it was impossible to doubt his genius for a moment. The word may have dwindled into hyperbole. It can nevertheless be defined, and when Auden died in 1973 it was defined by his friend V. S. Yanofsky: ‘There was in him some communion with the great human reality, as there was in Tolstoy — a trait characteristic of all geniuses, despite their fantasies.’ In conversation another friend of Auden, Isaiah Berlin, assented. Berlin thought there were two 20th-century Englishmen of genius, the other being Churchill.
An American scholar, Samuel Hines, called the 1930s the Age of Auden. It is important, three-quarters of a century later, to be aware how celebrated Auden became as a young man — more so than any poet since Byron.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in