Quick, nurse, they’re at it again! Boris Johnson’s evidence to the Privileges Committee today has re-started the longest running war in Westminster, after a temporary cessation of hostilities. Johnson savages his former No. 10 advisor Dominic Cummings in his submission, referencing the Vote Leave guru and his infamous Substack no fewer than ten times during his 52-page submission.
Suffice it to say, none of those references are complimentary. Johnson torches his onetime confidante in his testimony, declaring that Cummings ‘cannot be treated as a credible witness’ as he ‘bears an animus towards me’. He writes that ‘it is not clear what, if any, work the Committee has done to test the credibility of what is now said by Dominic Cummings, including his animosity towards me’ and ‘that there is no evidence he was told that any gatherings broke Covid rules other than what Dominic Cummings now says.’ Johnson concludes that
there is no evidence at all that supports an allegation that I intentionally or recklessly misled the House.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in