Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Boris was rattled at PMQs

(Photo by Jessica Taylor/UK Parliament)

Boris Johnson did not have a good Prime Minister’s Questions. It was never going to be a comfortable session, given the multiple rows about the funding of the Downing Street flat revamp and his reported comments about letting bodies ‘pile up’. But the way the Prime Minister approached it ensured both that the story will keep running and that he betrayed quite how annoyed he is by it.

It is little use trying, as Johnson repeatedly did, to argue that the British people are not interested in the line of questioning that Sir Keir Starmer was pursuing. For one thing, there is nothing like a politician claiming that something is ‘boring’ or a ‘non-story’ to make the media want to cover it all the more. For another, the way to make the flat row boring is to get all the information out there and get the story over and done with rather than allowing it to drag on. Johnson did not take this approach today, merely hoping that the appointment of Lord Geidt as the independent adviser on ministers’ interests, announced shortly before PMQs, might soften some of the blows.

Starmer continued to drill away, giving Johnson a ‘multiple choice’ of who paid ‘the initial invoice’

This was Starmer’s ideal session: full of detail and obfuscation and the chance to pin someone down on their use of language. He opened by asking Johnson to deny whether or not he used that phrase ‘let the bodies pile high’. He pointed out that there were numerous sources who had told broadcasters and the press that these comments did happen. The Prime Minister replied ‘no.’ He then demanded that Starmer bring real evidence of these comments to the House, saying that the discussions about lockdowns were ‘very bitter’ because shutting down the country was a ‘miserable’ decision.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in