‘Prefabs to solve housing crisis,’ screamed the front page of the Sunday Telegraph last weekend. Can the shortage of homes in Britain really be so bad that ministers are floating plans to encourage the first new generation of temporary, pre-packed houses since the great reconstruction drive which followed the second world war?
The UK is in the midst of a housing shortage that numerous credible experts now describe as ‘chronic’ and ‘acute’. While it’s widely recognised that we need 250,000 new homes each year to meet population growth and household formation, house-building hasn’t reached that level since the late 1970s.
During the Thatcher era, as fewer council houses were built, an average of 190,900 new homes were constructed each year. That dropped to 160,800 while John Major was prime minister as we came to rely ever more on private-sector house-builders, then 156,000 under Blair.
Gordon Brown’s short premiership saw annual house-building fall further to 143,400 in the aftermath of the 2008 credit crunch, which wiped out so many small- and medium–sized builders. There was then another sharp drop in the Cameron years, as new homes per annum fell to an average of just 123,560. From 2010 to 2015, UK house-building hit its lowest peacetime level since the 1926 general strike.
‘We haven’t been building nearly enough since the 1960s, and the total shortfall over the last 20 years has been huge — around 2.3 million homes,’ says Professor Paul Cheshire of the London School of Economics, an eminent housing expert who has advised successive governments. ‘A growing supply gap over the last few years has seen prices become more and more unaffordable and if we do nothing, it’ll get even worse.’
Back in the early 1990s, low- and middle-income workers needed to save 5 per cent of their wages for three years, on average, to build a deposit for a first-time property.