James Forsyth James Forsyth

Bush’s gravest misjudgement

One of the great myths about the Bush administration is that is has adopted a cookie-cutter approach to foreign policy. As Tim Montgomerie pointed out in The Times yesterday, there is actually very little ideological consistency to it as proven by the very different approaches taken to Iraq, Iran, North  Korea and Pakistan.

Of all these approaches, the ‘realist’ one taken to Pakistan may turn out to have been the most mistaken. The short-term convenience of a military strong-man prepared to back the United States, albeit only under duress, has—predictably—actually worsened the situation in the medium term. 

Bob Kagan, one of the smartest American strategists, explains why the idea of backing dictators is so flawed in the Washington Post.

“The dictator always argued [during the Cold War] that the choice was to support him or give the country to the communists. And he always made sure that this was the choice … Today, Pakistan’s Gen.

Britain’s best politics newsletters

You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in